• 한국방재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.02a
• /
• pp.703-706
• /
• 2008

Structural flood defensive alternatives have been evaluated based on economic feasibility, riskiness of safety and sustainability. Social problems associated with structural flood defensive alternatives such as dams, flood control channels, etc. are currently issued. The evaluation items of policy presented in KDI(2001) are should be modified in order to resolve the social problems. Hence, this study conducted a questionnaire survey of public servants, researchers, and engineers to obtain how to determine evaluation items for policy assessment and to compute their weights in the analytic hierarchy process. This study also compared the weights of the items in KDI(2000) with the weights from the survey in this study. The policy assessment weight was estimated higher than KDI(2000). This result suggests that social awareness increases and the analysis of policy becomes important for selecting optimal structural defensive alternatives.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.28 no.1B
• /
• pp.33-40
• /
• 2008

Intensive rainfalls in wet season (June~September) result in serious flood damage which is about 95% of natural hazard in Korea. Recently, in order to cope with repeated flood hazard, comprehensive flood control plans have been carried out in large basins in Korea. The plans suggest structural alternative plans for flood mitigation as well as non-structural plans. In this study, a practical method using a decision tree was developed to systematically allocate structural facilities for flood control, which maximizes the flood control capacity in a basin. This study also presents a practical guidance to organize structural defensive alternatives for a comprehensive flood control plan in a large basin.