텍스트 마이닝을 활용한 신문사에 따른 내용 및 논조 차이점 분석 (A Study on Differences of Contents and Tones of Arguments among Newspapers Using Text Mining Analysis)
-
- 지능정보연구
- /
- 제18권3호
- /
- pp.53-77
- /
- 2012
본 연구는 경향신문, 한겨레, 동아일보 세 개의 신문기사가 가지고 있는 내용 및 논조에 어떠한 차이가 있는지를 객관적인 데이터를 통해 제시하고자 시행되었다. 본 연구는 텍스트 마이닝 기법을 활용하여 신문기사의 키워드 단순빈도 분석과 Clustering, Classification 결과를 분석하여 제시하였으며, 경제, 문화 국제, 사회, 정치 및 사설 분야에서의 신문사 간 차이점을 분석하고자 하였다. 신문기사의 문단을 분석단위로 하여 각 신문사의 특성을 파악하였고, 키워드 네트워크로 키워드들 간의 관계를 시각화하여 신문사별 특성을 객관적으로 볼 수 있도록 제시하였다. 신문기사의 수집은 신문기사 데이터베이스 시스템인 KINDS에서 2008년부터 2012년까지 해당 주제로 주제어 검색을 하여 총 3,026개의 수집을 하였다. 수집된 신문기사들은 불용어 제거와 형태소 분석을 위해 Java로 구현된 Lucene Korean 모듈을 이용하여 자연어 처리를 하였다. 신문기사의 내용 및 논조를 파악하기 위해 경향신문, 한겨레, 동아일보가 정해진 기간 내에 일어난 특정 사건에 대해 언급하는 단어의 빈도 상위 10위를 제시하여 분석하였고, 키워드들 간 코사인 유사도를 분석하여 네트워크 지도를 만들었으며 단어들의 네트워크를 통해 Clustering 결과를 분석하였다. 신문사들마다의 논조를 확인하기 위해 Supervised Learning 기법을 활용하여 각각의 논조에 대해 분류하였으며, 마지막으로는 분류 성능 평가를 위해 정확률과 재현률, F-value를 측정하여 제시하였다. 본 연구를 통해 문화 전반, 경제 전반, 정치분야의 통합진보당 이슈에 대한 신문기사들에 전반적인 내용과 논조에 차이를 보이고 있음을 알 수 있었고, 사회분야의 4대강 사업에 대한 긍정-부정 논조에 차이가 있음을 발견할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 지금까지 연구되어왔던 한글 신문기사의 코딩 및 담화분석 방법에서 벗어나, 텍스트 마이닝 기법을 활용하여 다량의 데이터를 분석하였음에 의미가 있다. 향후 지속적인 연구를 통해 분류 성능을 보다 높인다면, 사람들이 뉴스를 접할 때 그 뉴스의 특정 논조 성향에 대해 우선적으로 파악하여 객관성을 유지한 채 정보에 접근할 수 있도록 도와주는 신뢰성 있는 툴을 만들 수 있을 것이라 기대한다.
목 적 : 사이버나이프 종양 추적 시스템(Cyber-knife tumor tracking system)은 환자 외부에 부착한 LED marker에서 얻어진 실시간 호흡 주기 신호와 호흡에 따라 움직이는 종양의 위치와의 상관관계를 바탕으로 종양의 위치를 미리 예측하고 종양의 움직임을 치료기와 동기화 (Synchronize) 시켜 실시간으로 종양을 추적하며 치료하는 시스템이다. 본 연구의 목적은 사이버나이프 종양 추적 방사선 치료 중 기침이나 수면 등으로 인해 예측 불가능한 갑작스러운 호흡 형태 변화에 따른 종양 추적 방사선 치료 시스템의 정확도를 평가하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 연구에 사용된 호흡 Log 파일은 본원에서 호흡 동조 방사선치료(Respiratory gating radiotherapy)나 사이버나이프 호흡 추적 방사선수술(Cyber-knife tracking radiosurgery)을 받았던 환자의 호흡 Log 파일을 바탕으로, 정현곡선 형태(Sinusoidal pattern)와 갑작스런 변화 형태(Sudden change pattern)의 Log 파일을 이용하여 측정이 가능하도록 재구성하였다. 재구성 된 호흡 Log 파일을 사이버나이프 동적 흉부 팬텀에 입력하여 호흡에 따른 움직임을 구현할 수 있도록 기존 동적 흉부 팬텀의 구동장치를 추가 제작하였고, 호흡의 형태를 팬텀에 적용 시킬 수 있는 프로그램을 개발하였다. 팬텀 내부 표적(Ball cube target)의 움직임은 호흡의 크기에 따라 상하(Superior-Inferior)방향으로 5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm 3가지 크기의 변위로 구동하게 하였다. 팬텀 내부 표적에 EBT3 필름 2장을 교차 삽입하여 표적 움직임의 변화에 따라 사이버나이프 제조사에서 제공된 End-to-End(E2E) test를 호흡의 형태에 따라 각각 5회씩 실시하고 측정하였다. 종양 추적 시스템의 정확도는 삽입된 필름을 분석하여 표적 오차(Targeting error)로 나타내었고, 추가로 E2E test가 진행되는 동안 상관관계 오차(Correlation error)를 측정하여 분석하였다. 결 과 : 표적 오차는 정현곡선 호흡 형태일 경우 표적 움직임의 크기가 5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm 에 따라 각각 평균
Just before the Korean War, the total number of the North Korean troops was 198,380, while that of the ROK(Republic of Korea) army troops 105,752. That is, the total number of the ROK army troops at that time was 53.3% of the total number of the North Korean army. As of December 2008, the total number of the North Korean troops is estimated to be 1,190,000, while that of the ROK troops is 655,000, so the ROK army maintains 55.04% of the total number of the North Korean troops. If the ROK army continues to reduce its troops according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the total number of its troops will be 517,000 m 2020. If North Korea maintains the current status(l,190,000 troops), the number of the ROK troops will be 43.4% of the North Korean army. In terms of units, just before the Korean War, the number of the ROK army divisions and regiments was 80% and 44.8% of North Korean army. As of December 2008, North Korea maintains 86 divisions and 69 regiments. Compared to the North Korean army, the ROK army maintains 46 Divisions (53.4% of North Korean army) and 15 regiments (21.3% of North Korean army). If the ROK army continue to reduce the military units according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of ROK army divisions will be 28(13 Active Division, 4 Mobilization Divisions and 11 Local Reserve Divisions), while that of the North Korean army will be 86 in 2020. In that case, the number of divisions of the ROK army will be 32.5% of North Korean army. During the Korean war, North Korea suddenly invaded the Republic of Korea and occupied its capital 3 days after the war began. At that time, the ROK army maintained 80% of army divisions, compared to the North Korean army. The lesson to be learned from this is that, if the ROK army is forced to disperse its divisions because of the simultaneous invasion of North Korea and attack of guerrillas in home front areas, the Republic of Korea can be in a serious military danger, even though it maintains 80% of military divisions of North Korea. If the ROK army promotes the plans in [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of military units of the ROK army will be 32.5% of that of the North Korean army. This ratio is 2.4 times lower than that of the time when the Korean war began, and in this case, 90% of total military power should be placed in the DMZ area. If 90% of military power is placed in the DMZ area, few troops will be left for the defense of home front. In addition, if the ROK army continues to reduce the troops, it can allow North Korea to have asymmetrical superiority in military force and it will eventually exert negative influence on the stability and peace of the Korean peninsular. On the other hand, it should be reminded that, during the Korean War, the Republic of Korea was attacked by North Korea, though it kept 53.3% of troops, compared to North Korea. It should also be reminded that, as of 2008, the ROK army is defending its territory with the troops 55.04% of North Korea. Moreover, the national defense is assisted by 25,120 troops of the US Forces in Korea. In case the total number of the ROK troops falls below 43.4% of the North Korean army, it may cause social unrest about the national security and may lead North Korea's misjudgement. Besides, according to Lanchester strategy, the party with weaker military power (60% compared to the party with stronger military power) has the 4.1% of winning possibility. Therefore, if we consider the fact that the total number of the ROK army troops is 55.04% of that of the North Korean army, the winning possibility of the ROK army is not higher than 4.1%. If the total number of ROK troops is reduced to 43.4% of that of North Korea, the winning possibility will be lower and the military operations will be in critically difficult situation. [Military Reform Plan 2020] rums at the reduction of troops and units of the ground forces under the policy of 'select few'. However, the problem is that the financial support to achieve this goal is not secured. Therefore, the promotion of [Military Reform Plan 2020] may cause the weakening of military defence power in 2020. Some advanced countries such as Japan, UK, Germany, and France have promoted the policy of 'select few'. However, what is to be noted is that the national security situation of those countries is much different from that of Korea. With the collapse of the Soviet Unions and European communist countries, the military threat of those European advanced countries has almost disappeared. In addition, the threats those advanced countries are facing are not wars in national level, but terrorism in international level. To cope with the threats like terrorism, large scaled army trops would not be necessary. So those advanced European countries can promote the policy of 'select few'. In line with this, those European countries put their focuses on the development of military sections that deal with non-military operations and protection from unspecified enemies. That is, those countries are promoting the policy of 'select few', because they found that the policy is suitable for their national security environment. Moreover, since they are pursuing common interest under the European Union(EU) and they can form an allied force under NATO, it is natural that they are pursing the 'select few' policy. At present, NATO maintains the larger number of troops(2,446,000) than Russia(l,027,000) to prepare for the potential threat of Russia. The situation of japan is also much different from that of Korea. As a country composed of islands, its prime military focus is put on the maritime defense. Accordingly, the development of ground force is given secondary focus. The japanese government promotes the policy to develop technology-concentrated small size navy and air-forces, instead of maintaining large-scaled ground force. In addition, because of the 'Peace Constitution' that was enacted just after the end of World War II, japan cannot maintain troops more than 240,000. With the limited number of troops (240,000), japan has no choice but to promote the policy of 'select few'. However, the situation of Korea is much different from the situations of those countries. The Republic of Korea is facing the threat of the North Korean Army that aims at keeping a large-scale military force. In addition, the countries surrounding Korea are also super powers containing strong military forces. Therefore, to cope with the actual threat of present and unspecified threat of future, the importance of maintaining a carefully calculated large-scale military force cannot be denied. Furthermore, when considering the fact that Korea is in a peninsular, the Republic of Korea must take it into consideration the tradition of continental countries' to maintain large-scale military powers. Since the Korean War, the ROK army has developed the technology-force combined military system, maintaining proper number of troops and units and pursuing 'select few' policy at the same time. This has been promoted with the consideration of military situation in the Koran peninsular and the cooperation of ROK-US combined forces. This kind of unique military system that cannot be found in other countries can be said to be an insightful one for the preparation for the actual threat of North Korea and the conflicts between continental countries and maritime countries. In addition, this kind of technology-force combined military system has enabled us to keep peace in Korea. Therefore, it would be desirable to maintain this technology-force combined military system until the reunification of the Korean peninsular. Furthermore, it is to be pointed out that blindly following the 'select few' policy of advanced countries is not a good option, because it is ignoring the military strategic situation of the Korean peninsular. If the Republic of Korea pursues the reduction of troops and units radically without consideration of the threat of North Korea and surrounding countries, it could be a significant strategic mistake. In addition, the ROK army should keep an eye on the fact the European advanced countries and Japan that are not facing direct military threats are spending more defense expenditures than Korea. If the ROK army reduces military power without proper alternatives, it would exert a negative effect on the stable economic development of Korea and peaceful reunification of the Korean peninsular. Therefore, the desirable option would be to focus on the development of quality of forces, maintaining proper size and number of troops and units under the technology-force combined military system. The tableau above shows that the advanced countries like the UK, Germany, Italy, and Austria spend more defense expenditure per person than the Republic of Korea, although they do not face actual military threats, and that they keep achieving better economic progress than the countries that spend less defense expenditure. Therefore, it would be necessary to adopt the merits of the defense systems of those advanced countries. As we have examined, it would be desirable to maintain the current size and number of troops and units, to promote 'select few' policy with increased defense expenditure, and to strengthen the technology-force combined military system. On the basis of firm national security, the Republic of Korea can develop efficient policies for reunification and prosperity, and jump into the status of advanced countries. Therefore, the plans to reduce troops and units in [Military Reform Plan 2020] should be reexamined. If it is difficult for the ROK army to maintain its size of 655,000 troops because of low birth rate, the plans to establish the prompt mobilization force or to adopt drafting system should be considered for the maintenance of proper number of troops and units. From now on, the Republic of Korean government should develop plans to keep peace as well as to prepare unexpected changes in the Korean peninsular. For the achievement of these missions, some options can be considered. The first one is to maintain the same size of military troops and units as North Korea. The second one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea in terms of military force index. The third one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea, with the combination of the prompt mobilization force and the troops in active service under the system of technology-force combined military system. At present, it would be not possible for the ROK army to maintain such a large-size military force as North Korea (1,190,000 troops and 86 units). So it would be rational to maintain almost the same level of military force as North Korea with the combination of the troops on the active list and the prompt mobilization forces. In other words, with the combination of the troops in active service (60%) and the prompt mobilization force (40%), the ROK army should develop the strategies to harmonize technology and forces. The Korean government should also be prepared for the strategic flexibility of USFK, the possibility of American policy change about the location of foreign army, radical unexpected changes in North Korea, the emergence of potential threat, surrounding countries' demand for Korean force for the maintenance of regional stability, and demand for international cooperation against terrorism. For this, it is necessary to develop new approaches toward the proper number and size of troops and units. For instance, to prepare for radical unexpected political or military changes in North Korea, the Republic of Korea should have plans to protect a large number of refugees, to control arms and people, to maintain social security, and to keep orders in North Korea. From the experiences of other countries, it is estimated that 115,000 to 230,000 troops, plus ten thousands of police are required to stabilize the North Korean society, in the case radical unexpected military or political change happens in North Korea. In addition, if the Republic of Korea should perform the release of hostages, control of mass destruction weapons, and suppress the internal wars in North Korea, it should send 460,000 troops to North Korea. Moreover, if the Republic of Korea wants to stop the attack of North Korea and flow of refugees in DMZ area, at least 600,000 troops would be required. In sum, even if the ROK army maintains 600,000 troops, it may need additional 460,000 troops to prepare for unexpected radical changes in North Korea. For this, it is necessary to establish the prompt mobilization force whose size and number are almost the same as the troops in active service. In case the ROK army keeps 650,000 troops, the proper number of the prompt mobilization force would be 460,000 to 500,000.