• 제목/요약/키워드: Spices (Food additives for taste)

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.016초

식품포장제의 식품쇼시사항에 대한 소바지로 인식에 관한 연구 -대구지역을 줌심으 로- (A Study on the Consumer Recognithion on the food label of Food label of Food Package in Taegu area)

  • 박영수
    • 동아시아식생활학회지
    • /
    • 제6권3호
    • /
    • pp.335-344
    • /
    • 1996
  • This study was to investigate consumer recognition on food label of food package. The results of this study were as follows: 1. when shopping for food, the items considered the most were taste of family, food safety, nutrition and price, respectively. 2. 95.5% of respondents confirmed of the food label of food package when shopping for food. The items confirmed the most on food label were expiration date, manufacture date, manufacturer, food additives and nutrition, respectively. 3. 85.3% of respondents did not satisfy on the food label of food label of food package. 43.6% of respondents demanded food additives more detailed. 28.2% of respondents demanded nutrition information more detailed. 28.2% of respondents demanded food function more detailed. 4. The food which respondents satisfied on food label most were snack '||'&'||' cookies, nuddle, spices, can '||'&'||' bottled food, instant food, processed meat foo, frozen food and imported food, respectively. 5. The group with the most hphrases falling in the top rank was nutrition/calories. The phrases in the nutrition/calories group scored in the top rank were 3 "positive" nutritional characteristics(addition of vitamins, addition of DHA, high dietary fiber) and 5 "nagative" nutritional characteristics(no sugar, low sugar, low calories, low salt and low cholesterol). The group with the most phrases falling in the third rank was ingredient. The phrases in the ingredient scored in the third rank were add of food additives. 6. 55.5% of respondents did not know Recommended Daily Allowance(RDA) information and 61.9% of respondents did not understand the nutrition declaration(content) of food package but 65.7% of resspondents understood the nutrition claim of food package. From these result, respondents were more affected by nutrition claim than by nutrition declaration on food package when shopping for food.ood.

  • PDF

보통의 식품첨가제의 SEM-EDS와 ICP-AES 분석 (SEM-EDS and ICP-AES Analysis of Common Food Additives)

  • Hussain, Raja Azadar;Yasmin, Farida;Nawaz, Hamid;Badshah, Amin
    • 대한화학회지
    • /
    • 제54권5호
    • /
    • pp.551-555
    • /
    • 2010
  • Cinnamomum Iners (Darchini, 쟈 바 계피), Elettaria Cardamomum (Elachi, 백두구, 소두구, 카다몬, 카도몬), Punica Granatum (Anar Dana, 석류), Curcuma Longa (Haldi, 터메릭, 투메릭, 심황, 울금, 울금은, 컬쿠마), Piper Nigrum (Kali Mirch, 페퍼, 페퍼블랙, 후추, 블랙 페퍼), Syzygium aromaticum (Loung, 클로브, 정향, 정향나무,), Capsicum Annum (Laal Mirch, 붉은 고추), Mentha Arvensis (Pahari Podina, 박하), Curcuma Zedoaria (Kachur, 가쥬츠, 봉출, 아출, 커큐머 제도) Zingiber officinale (Adrak, 건강, 생강, 진저) 그리고 Garam Masala (매운맛, 혼합물)은 SEM-EDS와 ICP-AES의 도움으로 그 속의 금속 성분을 위해 본 연구에서 분석되어졌다. 작은 농도는 ICP-AES로 찾아냈고 주된 농도는 SEM-EDS로 찾아냈다.