• Title/Summary/Keyword: Source Skin Distance(SSD)

Search Result 6, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Research of 6MeV electron dose distribution (Electron therapy에서의 dose distribution에 관한 연구)

  • Je Jae Yong;Park Chul Woo;Jin Sung Jin;Park Eun Tae
    • 대한방사선치료학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2005.06a
    • /
    • pp.27-32
    • /
    • 2005
  • Electron is used for the treatment of skin cancer, breast cancer, and head and neck cancer in clinic. Our study is performed to check the isodose distribut ion in source surface distance(SSD) and source bolus distance(SBD) setup, nipple influence to isodose distribution of electron, junctional area isodose variation of photon and electron field. Dosimetry is carried out with phantom, acryl, and film as the same condition of treatment setup. $8\%$ of isodose difference is noted with the surface distance(SSD) and source bolus distance(SBD) setup. To reduce the influence of nipple. corresponding volume of bolus should be removed. And bolus covering all the electron field reduced hot and cold spot of junctional area of photon.

  • PDF

Variation of Effective SSD According to Electron Energies and Irradiated Field Sizes (전자선 에너지 및 조사야에 따른 유효선원 피부 간 거리 변화)

  • Yang, Chil-Yong;Yum, Ha-Yong;Jung, Tae-Sik
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.157-163
    • /
    • 1987
  • It is known that fixed source to skin distance (SSD) cannot be used when the treatment field is sloped or larger than the size of second collimator in electron beam irradiation and inverse square law using effective ssd should be adopted. Effective SSDs were measured in different field sizes in each 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18MeV electron energy by suing NELAC 1018D linear accelerator of Kosin Medical Center. We found important parmeters of effective SSD. 1. Minimum effective SSD was 58.8cm in small field size of $6\pm6cm$ and maximum effective SSD was 94.9cm in large field size of $25\pm25cm$, with 6MeV energy. It's difference was 36.1cm. The dose rate at measuring point was quite different even with a small difference of SSD in small field $(6\times6cm)$ and low energy (6 MeV). 2. Effective SSD increased with field size in same electron energy. 3. Effective SSDs gradually increased with the electron energies and reached maximum at 12 or 15 MeV electron energy and decreased again at 18MeV electron energy in each identical field size. And so the effective SSD should be measured in each energy and field size for practical radiotherapy.

  • PDF

Research of 6 MeV Electron Dose Distribution (6 MeV Electron Therapy에서의 Electron Dose Distribution에 관한 연구)

  • Je Jae-Yong;Park Chul-Woo;Jin Sung-Jin;Park Eun-Tae
    • The Journal of Korean Society for Radiation Therapy
    • /
    • v.17 no.2
    • /
    • pp.161-166
    • /
    • 2005
  • Purpose : Electron is used for the treatment of skin cancer, breast cancer, and head and neck cancer in clinic. Our study is performed to check the isodose distribution in source surface distance(SSD)and source bolus distance(SBD)setup, nipple influence to isodose distribution of electron, junctional area isodose variation of photon and electron field. Materials and Methods : The electron dose distribution measures the diameter for 20 cm hemisphere paraffin phantom 2 made. It inserted the film between 2 paraffin phantom and it investigated it got radiation and dose distribution curve. Results : The 8% of isodose difference is with the surface distance(SSD)and source bolus distance(SBD)setup. The electon when the nipple exists inside the field, as nipple size it cuts the bolus and when it puts out and there is a possibility of getting the dose distribution which is homogeneous. When in the junction of electron and photon it uses the bolus it uses in the electron field whole, there is a possibility of getting the dose distribution which is homogeneous. Conclusion : The dose distribution decrease from the SBD setup. To reduce the influence of nipple, corresponding volume of bolus should be removed. And bolus covering all the electron field reduced hot and cold spot of junctional area of photon. In the future becomes the research which sees an effective electron therapy.

  • PDF

Study on the Reduction of Electron Contamination with A Cobalt-60 Gamma Ray (코발트-60 감마선의 전자 오염에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Tae-Kyu;Chun, Ha-Chung;Lee, Myung-Za
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • v.7 no.2
    • /
    • pp.293-297
    • /
    • 1989
  • Electron contamination due to the interaction between radiation beam and material was analyzed for the factors such as source-skin distance (SSD), field size, tray characteristics and position of filter, which can affect the surface dose in Cobalt teletherapy. Surface dose in open beam was more influenced by SSD with increasing field size. Relative surface charge (RSC) increased with the use of tray (solid, circular hole, slotted), compared with open beam, which is thought to be due to increased electron contamination of the tray. To reduce the surface dose, 0.4mm thick Lipowitz metal filter was used. Compared with open beam, RSC decreased by 8.8%, 11.3%, 13.3%, 16.6%, 19.3% and 21.7% for the field size of $5{\times}5$, $10{\times}10$, $15{\times}15$, $20{\times}20$, $25{\times}25$ and $30{\times}30cm^2$, respectively. On the contrary, use of Lipowitz metal filter increased RSC at 60cm or less SSD. Surface dose was effectively reduced with Lpowitz metal filter placed right below solid tray in Cobalt teletherapy.

  • PDF

Measurement of Breast Skin Dose According to Shield Thickness During Whole Spine Scanography Using Digital Radiography System (Digital Radiography 시스템을 사용하여 전 척추검사 시 차폐체 두께에 따른 유방피부선량 측정)

  • Nam, Soon-Kwon;Choi, Joon-Ho
    • Journal of radiological science and technology
    • /
    • v.42 no.1
    • /
    • pp.25-30
    • /
    • 2019
  • Whole Spine Scanography (WSS) using the Digital Radiography (DR) system is an examination that requires whole body X-ray exposure, which involves more exposure to radiation for patients than other general radiographies. This can affect the occurrence of breast cancer. This research measured radiation dose when breasts were shield and not shield using the Auto Exposure Control (AEC) mode. The radiation dose without a shield was 1.540 mGy, and that using a collimator was measured 0.506 mGy. Moreover, 0.733 mGy was measured when 1 shield (0.3 mm) was used, and $0.523{\mu}Gy$ when 5 of them (1.5 mm) were used. The results showed that the radiation dose with 5 shields and the radiation dose with a collimator were similar. Moreover, 0.233 mGy was measured when 8 shields (2.4 mm) were used. The standard deviation were 0.081 when using collimator and 0.014 when 5 shields were used. Also, when 8 shields were used, it was found to be 0.002. Most patients who go under a scoliosis test are children or young people who are highly sensitive to radiation. In the research results, the case where the organs sensitive to radiation, women's breasts, were shielded showed more distinct differences compared to without shields. It is considered that using shields can provide more constant shield than using a collimator and lower the risk of breast cancer caused by exposure to radiation.

Evaluation of Dosimetric Characteristics of Small Field in Cone Versus Square Fields Based on Linear Accelerators(LINAC) for Stereotactic Radiosugery(SRS) (선형가속기를 기반으로 한 뇌정위 방사선 수술 시 전용 콘과 정방형 소조사면의 선량 특성에 관한 고찰)

  • Yoon, Joon;Lee, Gui-Won;Park, Byung-Moon
    • Journal of radiological science and technology
    • /
    • v.33 no.1
    • /
    • pp.61-66
    • /
    • 2010
  • In this paper we evaluated small field dose characteristics of exclusive cone fields versus square fields for stereotactic radiosugery (SRS) which is based on linear accelerators (LINAC). For this test, we used a small beam detector (stereotactic fields detector : SFD) with a 6 MV photon beam and a water phantom system (IBA, Germany). Percentage depth dose (PDD) was measured for different field sets (cones : ${\Phi}1\;cm$, ${\Phi}2\;cm$, ${\Phi}3\;cm$ ; square fields : $1{\times}1\;cm^2$, $2{\times}2\;cm^2$, $3{\times}3\;cm^2$) at a source skin distance (SSD) of 100 cm. We measured the point depths at 1.5 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm, and 30 cm. The output factors were measured under the same geometrical conditions of the PDD and normalized at the maximum dose depth. To analyze the penumbra, we measured the dose profile with 95 cm of SSD, 5 cm of depth for each field sizes (${\Phi}1\;cm$, ${\Phi}3\;cm$, $1{\times}1\;cm^2$, and $3{\times}3\;cm^2$) using SFD. We obtained the values for every 1 mm interval in the physical field (90%) and 0.5 mm interval in the penumbra region (20 to 80%). The PDD variation of exclusive cones and square fields were 4.3 to 7.9% lesser than the standard field size ($10{\times}10\;cm^2$. The variation of PDD was reduced while the field size was increased. To compare the beam quality, we analyzed the $PDD_{20,10}$ and the results showed under the 1% of variations for all experiments except for ${\Phi}1\;cm$ cone and $1{\times}1\;cm^2$ fields. Output factors of exclusive cone were increased 3.1~4.6% than the square fields, and the penumbra region of exclusive cone was reduced 20% as compared to the square fields. As the previous researches report, it is very important for SRS and SFD that precise dosimetry in small beam fields. In this paper, we showed the effectiveness of exclusive cone, compared to square field. And we will study on the various detector characteristics for small beam fields.