• 제목/요약/키워드: Soluble form

검색결과 462건 처리시간 0.019초

1998-2004년 봄철에 한라산 1100 고지에서 채취한 PM2.5 미세먼지의 화학 특성 (Chemical characteristics of PM2.5 fine particles collected at 1100 site of Mt. Halla during spring seasons between 1998 and 2004)

  • 김원형;강창희;홍상범;고희정;이원
    • 분석과학
    • /
    • 제20권5호
    • /
    • pp.383-392
    • /
    • 2007
  • 1998~2004년 봄철에 한라산 1100 고지에서 $PM_{2.5}$ 미세입자를 채취하여 수용성 성분을 분석하였다. 연구기간의 연도별 $PM_{2.5}$ 질량농도는 $13.4{\pm}9.6{\sim}21.7{\pm}20.0{\mu}g/m^3$의 범위를 보였고, 이온 성분들의 농도는 nss-$SO{_4}^{2-}$ > $NH{_4}{^+}$ > $NO{_3}{^-}$ > $Ca^{2+}$ > $K^+$ > $Na^+$ > $Cl^-$ > $Mg^{2+}$ 순으로, nss-$SO{_4}^{2-}$ ($3.41{\pm}2.42{\mu}g/m^3$)이 가장 높았다. 이차 오염물질인 $NH{_4}{^+}$, $SO{_4}^{2-}$, $NO{_3}{^-}$의 농도는 각각 0.60~1.50, 2.86~4.42, $0.24{\sim}1.57{\mu}g/m^3$로 전체 이온 성분의 88%를 차지하였으나 해양 기원의 성분들은 5 % 미만의 조성을 보였다. nss-$SO{_4}^{2-}$$NH{_4}{^+}$, $K^+$과 높은 상관성을 보였으나 $NO{_3}{^-}$과의 상관성은 상대적으로 낮았고, $NH{_4}{^+}$과 nss-$SO{_4}^{2-}$은 미세입자에서 $(NH_4)_3H(SO_4)_2$$(NH_4)_2SO_4$의 형태로 존재하고 있는 것으로 추정된다. 역궤적 분석을 실시한 결과, $NH{_4}{^+}$과 nss-$SO{_4}^{2-}$이 동시에 고농도일 때 기단은 중국에서 발원되어 중국 동부에서 장시간 정체되었다가 제주 지역으로 유입되었다. 또 발생기원이 서로 다른 $NO{_3}{^-}$과 nss-$Ca^{2+}$의 농도가 높을 때 기단은 중국 또는 시베리아에서 발원하여 중국 동부를 거쳐 제주지역으로 이동한 것으로 조사되었다.

대기오염집중측정소별 2013~2015년 사이의 PM2.5 화학적 특성 차이 및 유발인자 조사 (Difference in Chemical Composition of PM2.5 and Investigation of its Causing Factors between 2013 and 2015 in Air Pollution Intensive Monitoring Stations)

  • 유근혜;박승식;김영성;신혜정;임철수;반수진;유정아;강현정;서영교;강경식;조미라;정선아;이민희;황태경;강병철;김효선
    • 한국대기환경학회지
    • /
    • 제34권1호
    • /
    • pp.16-37
    • /
    • 2018
  • In this study, difference in chemical composition of $PM_{2.5}$ observed between the year 2013 and 2015 at six air quality intensive monitoring stations (Bangryenogdo (BR), Seoul (SL), Daejeon (DJ), Gwangju (GJ), Ulsan (US), and Jeju (JJ)) was investigated and the possible factors causing their difference were also discussed. $PM_{2.5}$, organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC), and water-soluble ionic species concentrations were observed on a hourly basis in the six stations. The difference in chemical composition by regions was examined based on emissions of gaseous criteria pollutants (CO, $SO_2$, and $NO_2$), meteorological parameters (wind speed, temperature, and relative humidity), and origins and transport pathways of air masses. For the years 2013 and 2014, annual average $PM_{2.5}$ was in the order of SL ($${\sim_=}DJ$$)>GJ>BR>US>JJ, but the highest concentration in 2015 was found at DJ, following by GJ ($${\sim_=}SJ$$)>BR>US>JJ. Similar patterns were found in $SO{_4}^{2-}$, $NO_3{^-}$, and $NH_4{^+}$. Lower $PM_{2.5}$ at SL than at DJ and GJ was resulted from low concentrations of secondary ionic species. Annual average concentrations of OC and EC by regions had no big difference among the years, but their patterns were distinct from the $PM_{2.5}$, $SO{_4}^{2-}$, $NO_3{^-}$, and $NH_4{^+}$ concentrations by regions. 4-day air mass backward trajectory calculations indicated that in the event of daily average $PM_{2.5}$ exceeding the monthly average values, >70% of the air masses reaching the all stations were coming from northeastern Chinese polluted regions, indicating the long-range transportation (LTP) was an important contributor to $PM_{2.5}$ and its chemical composition at the stations. Lower concentrations of secondary ionic species and $PM_{2.5}$ at SL in 2015 than those at DJ and GJ sites were due to the decrease in impact by LTP from polluted Chinese regions, rather than the difference in local emissions of criteria gas pollutants ($SO_2$, $NO_2$, and $NH_3$) among the SL, DJ, and GJ sites. The difference in annual average $SO{_4}^{2-}$ by regions was resulted from combination of the difference in local $SO_2$ emissions and chemical conversion of $SO_2$ to $SO{_4}^{2-}$, and LTP from China. However, the $SO{_4}^{2-}$ at the sites were more influenced by LTP than the formation by chemical transformation of locally emitted $SO_2$. The $NO_3{^-}$ increase was closely associated with the increase in local emissions of nitrogen oxides at four urban sites except for the BR and JJ, as well as the LTP with a small contribution. Among the meterological parameters (wind speed, temperature, and relative humidity), the ambient temperature was most important factor to control the variation of $PM_{2.5}$ and its major chemical components concentrations. In other words, as the average temperature increases, the $PM_{2.5}$, OC, EC, and $NO_3{^-}$ concentrations showed a decreasing tendency, especially with a prominent feature in $NO_3{^-}$. Results from a case study that examined the $PM_{2.5}$ and its major chemical data observed between February 19 and March 2, 2014 at the all stations suggest that ambient $SO{_4}^{2-}$ and $NO_3{^-}$ concentrations are not necessarily proportional to the concentrations of their precursor emissions because the rates at which they form and their gas/particle partitioning may be controlled by factors (e.g., long range transportation) other than the concentration of the precursor gases.