• Title/Summary/Keyword: Soil Washing

Search Result 310, Processing Time 0.025 seconds

Model Development of Surfactant Reuse by Activated Carbons in Soil Washing Process (토양세척 공정에서 활성탄을 이용한 계면활성제 재사용 모델 개발)

  • Ahn, Chi-Kyu;Kim, Young-Mi;Woo, Seung-Han;Park, Jong-Moon
    • Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.1-12
    • /
    • 2006
  • A model describing the distributions of surfactants and HOCs (hydrophobic organic chemicals) in surfactant/HOC/activated carbon systems for surfactant reuse in soil washing process was developed. The model simulation was conducted for the evaluation of the effect of concentrations of surfactant, HOC, or activated carbons. Phenanthrene as a target HOC, Triton X-100 as surfactant and three granular activated carbons with different particle sizes (4-12, 12-20, and 20-40 mesh) were used in the model simulation. The distributions of HOC were significantly affected by surfactant dosages, especially at around the CMC(s). The results of selectivities for phenanthrene were much larger than 1 at various concentrations of surfactants, phenanthrene and activated carbons, which mean that the selective adsorption of phenanthrene by activated carbons is a proper separation method from surfactant solution. The model can be applied for the design of the surfactant reuse process using activated carbons without extra experimental efforts.

Effect of Surfactant Types on Washing of Diesel-contaminated Soil (디젤 오염 토양 세척시 계면활성제 종류의 영향)

  • Yang, Jung-Seok;Lee, You-Jin;Kim, Seong-Hye;Shin, Hyun-Jae;Yang, Ji-Won
    • Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
    • /
    • v.13 no.3
    • /
    • pp.8-14
    • /
    • 2008
  • The effects of surfactant types and the ratio of nonionic and anionic surfactants on the washing of diesel contaminated soil were investigated. In batch tests, the nonionic surfactant, which has HLB within 12-13, showed a high diesel removal efficiency and Tergitol 15-S-7 (T15S7) with 20 g/L concentration exhibited the highest removal efficiency of 79-88% among the tested nonionic surfactants. Anionic surfactants, in general, showed lower removal efficiency than nonionic surfactants. In case of mixed surfactant system, the removal efficiency increased with nonionic surfactant concentration. With mixed surfactants of T15S7 and SDS as 3 : 1 ratio, diesel removal was enhanced to 76% with 10 g/L of the mixed surfactants. These results could be used in the selection of proper surfactants for remediation of diesel contaminated soils.

Improvement of Verification Method for Remedial Works through the Suggestion of Indicative Parameters and Sampling Method (정화 보조지표와 시료 채취 방법 제안을 통한 토양정화검증 제도 개선 연구)

  • Kwon, Ji Cheol;Lee, Goontaek;Kim, Tae Seung;Yoon, Jeong-Ki;Kim, Ji-in;Kim, Yonghoon;Kim, Joonyoung;Choi, Jeongmin
    • Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
    • /
    • v.21 no.6
    • /
    • pp.179-191
    • /
    • 2016
  • In addition to the measurement of the concentration of soil contaminants, the new idea of indicative parameters was proposed to validate the remedial works through the monitoring for the changes of soil characteristics after applying the clean up technologies. The parameters like CFU (colony forming unit), pH and soil texture were recommended as indicative parameters for land farming. In case of soil washing, water content and the particle size distribution of the sludge were recommended as indicative parameters. The sludge is produced through the particle separation process in soil washing and it is usually treated as a waste. The parameters like water content, organic matter content, CEC (cation exchange capacity) and CFU were recommended as indicative parameters for the low temperature thermal desorption method. Besides the indicative parameter, sampling methods in stock pile and the optimal minimum amount of composite soil sample were proposed. The rates of sampling error in regular grid, zigzag, four bearing, random grid methods were 17.3%, 17.6%, 17.2% and 16.5% respectively. The random grid method showed the minimum sampling error among the 4 kinds of sampling methods although the differences in sampling errors were very little. Therefore the random grid method was recommended as an appropriate sampling method in stock pile. It was not possible to propose a value of optimal minimum amount of composite soil sample based on the real analytical data due to the dynamic variation of $CV_{fund{\cdot}error}$. Instead of this, 355 g of soil was recommended for the optimal minimum amount of composite soil sample under the assumption of ISO 10381-8.

Removal of Hydrophobic Contaminant using Amphiphilic Block Copolymer (양친성 블록공중합체를 이용한 소수성 오염원제거)

  • Lee, Junhyup;Shim, Jaeyoul;Kim, Younguk
    • Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
    • /
    • v.15 no.3
    • /
    • pp.15-19
    • /
    • 2014
  • Spilling pollutants and its contamination to the ground have serious impact to public resulting in various research about remediation techniques. In this study, the use of amphiphilic block copolymer for remediation was investigated with a series of laboratory tests on removal of hydrophobic contaminant in soil. Four types of amphiphilic block copolymer were developed and the efficiency of the cleaning was compared with surfactant using arbitrary diesel-contaminated soils. The results of the study show that the use of amphiphilic polymer in the soil washing process significantly enhanced the remediation of the contaminated soil and a potential of new methodology of eco-friendly remediation.

Improvement of Landfarming Applicability from Analysis of Case Studies (토양경작법의 사례 분석을 통한 적용방안 개선)

  • Kim, Jong-Won;Choi, Sang-Il;Yang, Jae-Kyu;Kim, Bo-Kyung
    • Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.19-28
    • /
    • 2010
  • Considering six screen matrix to select an optimum remediation method for the Kunsan military base contaminated with petroleum oil, the following order was obtained: landfarming > biopile > soil washing > thermal desorption = incineration. When the landfarming method was applied for the remediation of 2,250 $m^3$ soil contaminated with petroleum oil ranging from 500 to 2,404 mg/kg as TPH, contamination level decreased below target concentration 450 mg/kg after 20~42 days depending on the initial contamination. From the evaluation of case studies of landfarming, it is suggested that ratty-truss or single-arch structure is suitable in the landfarming plant for the treatment of large-scale contaminated soil requiring long period of remediation. But, vinyl-house structure is suitable in the landfarming plant for the treatment of small-scale contaminated soil requiring short period of remediation. Therefore vinyl-house structure is recommended in the remediation of contaminated soil less than 5,000 $m^3$ requiring within 1 year of remediation period but ratty-truss or single-arch structure is recommended for the remediation of contaminated soil more than 5,000 $m^3$.

An Analysis of the Ageing Effect on the Removal of Cesium and Cobalt from Radioactive Soil by the Electrokinetic Method

  • Kim Gye-Nam;Oh Won-Zin;Won Hui-Zun;Jung Chong-Hun
    • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • v.36 no.4
    • /
    • pp.304-315
    • /
    • 2004
  • The ageing effects of radionuclides in radioactive soil on remediation using the electrokinetic method were analyzed. Comparative experiments were conducted for the reactive soil around a TRIGA research? reactor contaminated with $^{137}Cs\;and\;^{60}Co$ for 15 years and the non-reactive soil that was intentionally contaminated with $Cs^+\;and\;Co^{2+}$ for 3 days. It was observed that because of an aging effect on $^{137}Cs$, the efficiency of removing it decreased. $H_{2}SO_4$ used as an additive to increase the removal efficiency showed a higher removal capability than other chemicals for both $^{137}Cs\;and\;^{60}Co$. The efficiency of removing radionuclides from the radioactive soil in the column was proportional to the capability of the added chemical to extract radionuclides. It took 10 days to achieve a $54\%$ removal of $^{137}Cs$ and a $97\%$ removal of $^{60}Co$ from the soil. The volume of the soil wastewater discharged from the soil column by the electrokinetic method was $20\%$ below that for soil washing.