• 대한지역사회영양학회지
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.645-656
• /
• 2001

The relationship between socio-economic status and food and nutrient consumption patterns was studied in 7,370 Koreans aged 20 years and older in the 1995 Korean Health and Nutrition Survey. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rapid economic growth on food and nutrient consumption for Korean adults in the last 30 years. Monthly household income, and individual's educational level and occupation were chosen as variables of socio-economic status for individuals. A one day 24 hour recall method was used for the dietary survey. One way analysis of varience was adopted to test tole association between socio-economic variables and food and nutrient consumption patterns. Individuals who had a high socio-economic status had significantly higher daily intake of most of the nutrients including calcium, vitamin A, vitamin B$_2$which reached above the recommended dietary allowances(RDA) and a higher percentage energy consumption from fat. In addition, individual who belonged to a low socio-economic status consumed less animal foods, including meat, egg, milk and consumed low proportion of energy from fat. The results suggest that in spite of rapid economic growth during the last 30 years in Korea, individuals who belonged to low sorio-economic status categories are still nutritionally vulnerable. Among the sorio-economic variables, income and education except occupation were the influential factors on the food and nutrient consumption of Koreans. Therefore, nutrition policy should focus on influencing the dietary patterns of lower social class individuals to improve the health status of the population as a whole.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권8호
• /
• pp.151-159
• /
• 2020

This study aims to determine the factors influencing the community behavior in improving competitive rural tourism as well as understanding the role of economic literacy in mediating socio-economic indicators and rural competitive advantage. This research followed an explanatory research to examine the relationship between variables including socio-economic variables and rural tourism competitive advantage. The data was gathered by conducting observations and interviews with tourism businesses, stakeholders, and the local village government, and related agencies as respondents. Furthermore, the data were analyzed following inductive and descriptive statistics. The findings indicated that, from all variables used, solely the environmental impact variable did not affect economic literacy and the competitive advantage of rural tourism. The moderating variables showed that the economic literacy mediates the economic impact on rural tourism competitive advantage. In addition, socio-cultural impacts on rural competitive advantage tourism, and the stakeholder involvement affects rural competitive advantage tourism. However, economic literacy failed in mediating between environmental impacts on rural competitive advantage tourism. This is due to the increasing understanding of the economy of the community around the tourist attractions it will increase the business around the tourist attractions that have an impact on environmental damage around the tourist attractions.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.39-49
• /
• 2000

This research investigated the effect of socio-economic variables and economic distress variables on the university students' coping behavior in meal management. The data used in this research included 544 university students in Ulsan Areas. The independent explanatory power of socio-economic variables was larger than economic distress variables. But the explanatory power was increased in the regression analysis model that was included both the socio-economic variables and the economic distress variables. The influencing variables that effected the level of coping behavior in meal management were the amount of discretionary expenditure, gender, status of housing, employment distress and income distress.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.159-163
• /
• 2013

Background: This study used Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) pancreatic cancer data to identify predictive models and potential socio-economic disparities in pancreatic cancer outcome. Materials and Methods: For risk modeling, Kaplan Meier method was used for cause specific survival analysis. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test was used to compare survival curves. The Cox proportional hazard method was applied for multivariate analysis. The area under the ROC curve was computed for predictors of absolute risk of death, optimized to improve efficiency. Results: This study included 58,747 patients. The mean follow up time (S.D.) was 7.6 (10.6) months. SEER stage and grade were strongly predictive univariates. Sex, race, and three socio-economic factors (county level family income, rural-urban residence status, and county level education attainment) were independent multivariate predictors. Racial and socio-economic factors were associated with about 2% difference in absolute cause specific survival. Conclusions: This study s found significant effects of socio-economic factors on pancreas cancer outcome. These data may generate hypotheses for trials to eliminate these outcome disparities.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.9-14
• /
• 2022

The main purpose of the study is to determine the main features of the socio-economic development of the countries of the world under the influence of the digital economy and COVID-19. The modern world has already taken the first step towards a fundamentally new technological, economic and social reality. However, the challenges facing the modern industrial society cannot be overestimated. We are talking about changing the global socio-technological order, the consequence of which is a complete reformatting of the systems familiar to us, the formation of new social and economic strategies. the technological paradigm is immediately changing, management models and social norms are changing, large-scale demographic shifts are taking place. As a result of the study, key aspects of socio-economic development in the digital economy were identified.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.165-185
• /
• 2004

Assessment in Socio-economic items should be used to estimate social influence when policies and projects were introduced. To estimate current situation of socio-economic items 19 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) of large scale projects were analyzed. The projects were selected based on magnitude of social impact when the projects were implemented. Environmental Impact Statement was categorized into line projects(road construction, railroad construction, stream development, etc), and surface projects(energy development, wetland reclamation, recreation and sport development, and housing and residential development, etc) thus being chosen for 19 projects in each categories. This report was based on the analysis of 7 items in socio-economic environmental items(i.e., population, residents, industry, public facilities, education, transport and historical monument). Most EIS did not follow the regulation suggested by Ministry of Environment, and only current circumstances were briefly described. Indifference of in-depth analysis of socioeconomic environmental items would influence the process of social and environment impact negatively in the midst of construction of National Projects such as Outer Circle Seoul Highways, Saemankeum Reclamation Projects, etc. This abrupt halt of construction was mostly based on a lack of public hearing or public participation. Socio-economic items are also very much lacking in quantitative method and strengthening socio-economic environmental items is needed via checklist or matrix that brings decision-makers better ideas objectively.

• Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society
• /
• 제20권6호
• /
• pp.3227-3238
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 중장년층 이상을 대상으로 사회경제적 박탈이 우울에 미치는 영향에 있어 시간의 흐름에 따른 효과를 심층적으로 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 잠재성장모형을 이용한 우울과 사회경제적 박탈의 2개 요인 간의 인과적 관계를 규명하는 방법을 적용하였다. 자료는 한국복지패널의 2013년(8차 조사)부터 2017년(12차 조사)까지의 5년간 자료에서 만40세 이상 7,434명을 대상으로 하였다. 연구결과, 우울 수준은 연도가 지날수록 점차적으로 낮아지는 선형적인 변화를 나타내었다. 박탈요인의 초기점수가 높을수록 우울의 초기값 또한 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 박탈요인의 초기값이 클수록 우울의 변화량도 함께 증가되어 박탈의 초기수준이 우울증가의 변화에도 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로, 박탈요인의 변화량이 높을수록 우울의 변화량이 함께 증가되는 경향이 있었다. 이러한 연구결과로 볼 때, 시간이 흐름에 따라 박탈을 많이 경험할수록 우울 수준도 높아진다는 사실과 박탈의 변화수준 또한 우울의 변화수준에 영향을 미친다는 것이다. 본 연구가 갖는 함의는 우울을 예측하는 요소로서 중장년기의 사회경제적 박탈은 국가 정책적 차원에서 지원과 관심이 지속적으로 필요하다는 점이다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권12호
• /
• pp.7133-7136
• /
• 2013

Background: We studied Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) breast cancer data of Georgia USA to analyze the impact of socio-economic factors on the disparity of breast cancer treatment outcome. Materials and Methods: This study explored socio-economic, staging and treatment factors that were available in the SEER database for breast cancer from Georgia registry diagnosed in 2004-2009. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was computed for each predictor to measure its discriminatory power. The best biological predictors were selected to be analyzed with socio-economic factors. Survival analysis, Kolmogorov-Smirnov 2-sample tests and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used for univariate and multivariate analyses of time to breast cancer specific survival data. Results: There were 34,671 patients included in this study, 99.3% being females with breast cancer. This study identified race and education attainment of county of residence as predictors of poor outcome. On multivariate analysis, these socio-economic factors remained independently prognostic. Overall, race and education status of the place of residence predicted up to 10% decrease in cause specific survival at 5 years. Conclusions: Socio-economic factors are important determinants of breast cancer outcome and ensuring access to breast cancer treatment may eliminate disparities.

• 사회복지연구
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.205-233
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 복지국가의 제도적 맥락에 기초하여 '사회의 질(social quality)' 하위영역 중 사회경제적 안전성의 영역과 사회적 응집성의 영역의 관계를 파악하고자 하는 목적에서 출발한다. 복지국가의 제도적 맥락을 포착하기 위한 틀로 복지지위론을 채택하여 각 개인이 가지는 사회경제적 자원을 복지수급자의 지위와 복지납세자의 지위로 측정하였으며, 사회경제적 안전성의 영역이 사회적 응집성의 영역에 영향을 미친다는 이론적 가설을 설정하였다. 가설 검증을 위해 사회적 응집성의 핵심지표로 사회신뢰 인식을 투입하여, 2008년에 실시된 사회조사자료를 대상으로 복지지위, 사회경제적 안전성 인식, 사회신뢰 인식에 이르는 구조방정식모형(SEM) 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 복지수급의 권리 차원에서의 자원의 양은 사회경제적 안전성에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤으나, 복지공급의 의무 차원에서의 자원의 양은 유의한 영향을 미치지 못하였다. 복지수급의 권리 차원과 의무 차원 모두 사회신뢰 인식에는 유의한 영향을 미쳤으며, 사회경제적 안전성에 대한 인식은 사회신뢰에 대한 인식에 유의한 영향을 미쳤다. 결론적으로, 사회의 질 하위영역 들 중에서 사회경제적 안전성 분면이 사회적 응집성 분면에 영향을 미치는 것을 확인하였다. 이런 결과들은 향후 한국사회의 사회적 응집 수준을 높이기 위해서는 보다 정교한 수준의 복지제도 배치가 필요함을 암시한다.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.49-55
• /
• 2010

해상에서 유류유출사고가 발생하면 해양생태계 파괴 뿐 아니라 바다에 의존하여 삶을 영위하는 인간에게 사회경제적으로 미치는 영향이 크다. 법률(해양환경관리법)에서는 유류유출시 해양오염영향조사를 하도록 규정하고 있지만, 사회경제적 영향을 평가하기에는 법률상 조사 항목이 구체적이지 못하고, 세부항목 간 중복 등의 문제가 있다. 본 연구에서는 법률상 해양오염영향조사 시스템 중 사회경제 분야의 조사를 중심으로 문제점을 진단하고, 사회경제적 영향평가의 범주와 지표를 개발하여 제도적 개선의 방안을 제시하였다.