• 제목/요약/키워드: Sino-Japanese War

검색결과 18건 처리시간 0.027초

An Alternative Explanation for Anti-Japanese Sentiment in China: Shifting State-Society Interaction in China's Japan Policy

  • Zhou, Min
    • Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.61-75
    • /
    • 2012
  • The historical turbulence between China and Japan started from the First Sino-Japanese War in 1895, and culminated in Japan's invasion of China during World War Two (the Second Sino-Japanese War) between 1937 and 1945. A series of wars caused huge human and material losses in both countries, and both experienced comprehensive transformations during and after the wars. The impact of this historical turbulence is so long-lasting that it still influences both countries' social psyche. Moreover, it continues casting a long shadow upon the current Sino-Japanese relations. The recent turbulence in Sino-Japanese relations partly stems from the historical turbulence. It is much less violent but can also be emotional and worrisome. It started from the early 1980s (the Japanese history textbook controversy in 1982 and the 1985 anti-Japanese student protests in China), and culminated in the anti-Japanese mass demonstrations in multiple Chinese cities in 2005 (Bush 2010; Gries 2005; Reilly 2012; Stockmann 2010; Weiss 2008). In addition to dramatic demonstrations on streets, there are also other forms of movements, such as war reparations movements, in which Chinese war victims demand reparations from the Japanese state and companies (Rose 2005; Xu and Fine 2010; Xu and Pu 2010). Although the tension has existed for many years and surfaced from time to time, the eruption of the nationwide anti-Japanese movements in China in 2005 still shocked many outside observers. Many scholars have tried to explain the anti-Japanese sentiment within current Chinese society that underlies and drives these social movements. Through careful reexamination of the existing literature, this article proposes an explanation for the anti-Japanese sentiment from a perspective that stresses the shifting state-society interaction in China's Japan policy. Specifically, the totalitarian Chinese state's neglect and suppression of genuine social concerns regarding Japan in earlier years, followed by a relatively liberalized state that tolerates societal participation in Sino-Japanese relations, are an importance source of the anti-Japanese sentiment recently observed in China.

중일전쟁 이후 일제의 금속자원 통제와 건축자재 대용품 개발 (Control of metal resources and development of substitute materials for building materials by Japan after the Second Sino-Japanese War)

  • 홍경화;한동수
    • 건축역사연구
    • /
    • 제31권4호
    • /
    • pp.7-16
    • /
    • 2022
  • Since the beginning of the second Sino-Japanese war in 1937, the entire Korean Peninsula has entered a full-fledged wartime system. Japan enacted laws that strongly regulate the distribution of various resources for war, and the same was implemented in Joseon. In particular, as iron, copper, lead, tin, and aluminum were mobilized as raw materials for military supplies such as weapons, private distribution decreased significantly, which had a great impact on the construction industry. As the use of metal such as steel as building materials requires permission from the provincial governor, it has become difficult to supply and demand except for some military facilities. In addition, the Japanese Ministry of Commerce and Industry encouraged research and development and manufacturing to promote the so-called "substitute goods industry" to make up for the shortage of supplies. Products with improved performance through chemical treatment by injecting only a small amount of the same raw material than before or using alternative raw materials have been developed. It was intended to overcome the limitations of lack of raw materials through the chemical industry. In terms of building materials, various substitutes were produced due to the incorporation of petrochemicals and the use of synthetic resins. This trend continued even after the end of the war and served as one of the backgrounds for R&D and production of new materials without returning to the "substitute goods."

'칙어'와 '소칙'과 '반전 센류' (Imperial Rescript (Chokugo), Imperial Rescript (Shousho) and an Anti-war Senryu)

  • 구루미사와 겐
    • 비교문화연구
    • /
    • 제51권
    • /
    • pp.25-44
    • /
    • 2018
  • 일본 근대의 '반전시'의 기원은 청일전쟁과 러일전쟁으로 거슬러 올라간다. 청일전쟁은 천황의 '선전소칙' 포고로 개시된 첫 전쟁이다. 전쟁은 천황의 명령이며, 국민에 대한 '말씀'이다. '반대'하는 것은 허락되지 않았다. '소칙'에 따른 '전쟁'은 '성전'이고 정당성이 부여된다. 그 때문에 '반전(反戰)'은 천황의 명령과 '말씀'에 거역하는 사상, 표현으로 간주된다. 따라서 '반전시'로 잘 알려진 요사노 아키코의 "그대여 죽지 말지어다"(1904)는 발표 당시부터 "국가의 이름으로 처벌하라"라는 맹렬한 비판을 받게 된다. '반전시'는 언론탄압의 역사이기도 하다. 그 중에서도 단시형 문학에 대한 탄압은 그 정도가 매우 극심하였다. 마이너 장르인 탓에 지금까지 간과되어 왔지만 다시금 '반전시' 계보로 자리매김하고 재평가할 필요가 있다. 특히 러일전쟁에 탄생한 근대 센류(신센류)는, 풍자와 반어법을 구사하며 정치와 사회 전반을 비판했다는 이유로 국가로부터 집요한 감시와 탄압을 받았다. '교육칙어'를 풍자한 쓰루 아키라의 '반전 센류'는 그 최전선에 자리한다. 본 논문에서는 바로 이 풍자와 반어법에 주목하여 '소칙'과 '칙어'를 반전(反轉)시키는 '반전(反戰) 센류'를 고찰한 것이다.

일제강점기 『조선명승시선(朝鮮名勝詩選)』에 나타나는 명승고적의 문화경관 연구 - 충청남도 천안을 사례로 - (A Study on the Cultural Landscapes of Scenic Sites on 『Joseon myeongseungsiseon(朝鮮名勝詩選)』 at the Japanese Colonial Period - A Case of Cheonan, Chungnam Province -)

  • 이행열
    • 한국전통조경학회지
    • /
    • 제37권2호
    • /
    • pp.40-53
    • /
    • 2019
  • "조선명승시선(朝鮮名勝詩選,1915)"을 "신증동국여지승람(新增東國輿地勝覽)"과 "조선환여승람(朝鮮?與勝覽)"을 이용하여 충청남도 천안편을 중심으로 일제강점기에 나타나는 명승고적의 변화를 살펴보고자 하였다. "조선명승시선"이 발간된 시대적 상황을 검토해 본 결과 1894년에 발발한 '청일전쟁(淸日戰爭)'에 대한 기억이 기록된 내용으로 발간되었으며, 한일강제합방(1910) 이후의 조선총독부 '동화주의 교육'과 궤를 같이 하였다. 저자인 나루시마 사기무라(成島鷺村)에 대하여는 서문을 통하여 파악할 수 있었다. "명승시선"에서 각 명승고적을 기술하는데 가장 많은 분량을 차지하는 곳은 '안성도(15줄)'로, 일본의 '청일전쟁'과 같은 전쟁의 기억을 담고 있는 곳이었다. "여지승람"과 "환여승람"에 공통으로 나타나는 명승고적은 천안의 경우 모두 13개소가 된다. 대부분 내용이 비슷하거나 유사한 것으로 기술되었다. 다만 '홍경원'과 '성환역'은 기존의 명승고적이 가지고 있는 조선의 산수관에 대한 층 위에 '정유재란' 또는 '청일전쟁'이라고 하는 새로운 전쟁의 역사층을 덧씌워서 전혀 새로운 명승고적의 '장소성'으로 전환시켜 기술하였다는 점이다. 새롭게 기술된 명승고적 중 '안성도'는 '청일전쟁'에서 일본의 첫 패배를 안겨준 '안성천전투'에 대한 기억을 중심으로 서술하고 있는 부분이다. 특히 본문 중에 시노부 순페이의 시를 소개하여 장소성과 시와의 직접적인 연관성을 강조하여 시 감상의 묘미를 극대화시키는 작용을 하도록 기술되었다. 반면 조선의 시는 모두 10편으로 제목과 소재가 대부분 역사적 장소와 연관되며, 내용 또한 그러한 역사적 맥락을 이해할 때 시 감상의 묘미가 더욱 높아진다. 그러나 실제 구성은 전혀 페이지를 달리함으로써 그러한 맥락 관계가 무시되었다. 이러한 명승고적들이 가지는 장소성에 대하여 살펴보면 장소의 위치, 의미, 규모, 주변의 여건 등을 고려해 볼 때 다양한 유형으로 나타나고 있다. 즉 여행자를 위한 서비스 공간, 조망과 휴식 또는 회고를 위한 공간, 예불 또는 추모를 위한 사찰공간, 방어와 보호를 위한 성곽시설, 또는 임금의 어가공간 그리고 옛날 전쟁터 등으로 나타나고 있다. 특히 주목되는 공간으로는 은둔과 동학농민의 투쟁공간이 함께 하고 있다는 점에서 천안이라는 지역의 문화경관으로서의 다양성을 발견할 수 있으며, 앞으로 이러한 점을 토대로 하여 지역문화재의 보존과 복원을 위한 정책을 수립할 필요가 있다.

일제강점기 ‘간호부규칙(看護婦規則)’에 관한 연구 (The 'Nurses Ordinance' of Korea under Japanese Rule)

  • 이꽃메;김화중
    • 지역사회간호학회지
    • /
    • 제9권2호
    • /
    • pp.291-302
    • /
    • 1998
  • The Japanese colonial authorities promulgated the 'Nurses Ordinance(Kanhoboo Kyuchick), in 1914. It was the first act that regulated nurses' licensure in Korea. The gendarme did the administrational work of the ordinance. After the Nurses Ordinance of 1914, nurses without licenses could no longer work with the name of nurse, and Korean nursing gained a more professional status. After the March 1st Movement of 1919, Japan realized that its iron rule had to be more sophisticated. The gendarme gave way to an ordinary constabulary force. The Nurses Ordinance was amended to set the nurses quality as good as that of Japanese nurses, and the nurses licensure of Korea could also be used in Japan. In 1931 the Japanese war against China began, and the Japanese imposed military rule once again. The Nurses Ordinance was amended to 'The Korea Nurses Ordinance'. After the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War(1937) and of World War II in the Pacific(1941), the Japanese desperately needed additional manpower to re plenish the dwindling ranks of their military and labour forces. To produce more nurses, the colonial authorities amended the 'Korea Nurses Ordinance' and lowered the age and educational status of nurses to produce more numbers. Until the Japanese surrender in August 1945, Korea was under Japanese rule. Koreans had no say in the passing of these acts, and the colonial authority could make and pass any act at will.

  • PDF

Japanese Broadcasting in Shanghai during the Periods of Solitary Island and Occupation: A Case Study on the Great Eastern Broadcasting Station (Daito Hoso Kyoku)

  • Ge, Tao
    • Journal of East-Asian Urban History
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.113-128
    • /
    • 2020
  • Right before the outbreak of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression (1937-1954), the Great Eastern Broadcasting Station (GEBS) was established in Shanghai under the aegis of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA). Prior to the launching of the GEBS, Japan had not owned similar radio stations in China for years. As a result, the Embassy of Japan in China held rounds of discussions on the plan and Japanese governments, ranging from the MOFA, the Navy, the Army, the Ministry of Communications (MOC), and NHK-Japan Broadcasting Corporation (Nihon Hoso Kyoku) provided financial, technological, and equipment support. In the mid-1930s when the Sino-Japanese relations became intensified, the GEBS assumed the primary role of disseminating government policies to over 30,000 Japanese expatriates in Shanghai to make sure that they could remain settled while supporting military endeavors of the Japanese army once the war between China and Japanese broke out. After 1937, the GEBS became an essential propaganda tool to advance imperial policies of Japan. Although the station differed from the Army-controlled Greater Shanghai Broadcasting Station (Dai Shanhai Hoso Kyoku) in many aspects, it was in line with the latter in terms of advancing wartime ideology of the Japanese empire. As the Japanese-occupied areas were enlarged, target audience of the GEBS also expanded to Chinese people and foreign nationals when Japanese, English, Russian, and Shanghai-dialect news was broadcast by the station. Suffice it to say that the GEBS was closely related to wartime propaganda of the Japanese imperial expansion.

해방이전의 수산금융에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Fisheries financing before the Liberation of Korea)

  • 김경호
    • 수산경영론집
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.1-23
    • /
    • 1984
  • In fisheries financing before the liberation of Korea, the accommodation of funds through modern monetary facilities was hardly benefited to most of small-scale Korean fishermen except Japanese fishermen living in Korea and some large-scale Korean fishermen. In fact, since Korean economy was only in the beginning stage of capitalism free from natural economy in the end of Yi Dynasty, it was natural that the supply of funds should be lacked. But after the opening of ports in Korea, the external shapes in Korean society were slowly changed according as heteronomous modernization was pushed forward by means of western capitalism and the intentional invasion of Japanese was gradually weighed. Thus all kinds of fishing equipments and technique were developed by dint of modernization, and modern monetary facilities also came into being. But most of Korean fishermen were hardly benefited by modern monetary facilities. Fishermen who were faced with destitution of funds were forced to rely upon high interest loans in order to make a living or maintain fisheries, and they were severely exploited by usurers. The situation was the same in the period of Japanese imperialism. Japanese felt the necessity of advancement of Korean fisheries and established fisheries institution suitable for all kinds of colonial fisheries policy toward Korea so that they could build up the foundation according to the development of capitalism and carry out the Russo-Japanese War and the Sino-Japanese War. There were a series of bottlenecks in financing on account of the deficiency of fisheries institution in the beginning of Japanese imperialism, but the financial pressure was lightened because the arrangement of institution greatly contributed to the smoothness of fisheries financing in the latter part of it. Despite such improvement of financing, the benefit of funds could not equally reach to all the fishermen. It only reached to Japanese fishermen living in Korea and some large scale Korean fishermen. Thus most of korean fishermen could not free themselves from destitution of financing and the pressure of high interest loans. This phenomenon took place because Korean fisheries had the antinomic characteristics that financial restriction was excessive owing to the industrial speciality of fisheries, on the other hand there was a large financial demand in fisheries in the character of industry.

  • PDF

전시총동원체제기 여성의 강제동원과 사실 규명의 과제 (Forced Mobilization of Women during the wartime general mobilization system and the task of Finding Facts)

  • 강혜경
    • 문화기술의 융합
    • /
    • 제7권1호
    • /
    • pp.336-342
    • /
    • 2021
  • 일본제국주의는 1937년 중일전쟁을 일으키고 1938년 국가총동원법을 공포하면서 전시총동원체제를 구축해 나갔다. 전시총동원체제기에 접어들면서 일제는 여성들의 노동력에 주목하여 국내뿐만 아니라 국외로도 여성들을 동원하였다. 식민지 조선은 물론 국외의 여성들까지 근로보국대, 여자근로정신대 등으로 강제로 동원되었다. 여성들은 가내 노동은 물론 이미 동원된 남성들의 노동을 대신해야 했으며, 동시에 강제로 전쟁을 위해 동원되는 열악한 상황에 처했다. 여자근로정신대의 동원은 관청의 알선, 모집, 자발적인 지원, 학교나 단체를 통한 선전, 취업 사기, 강제나 협박 등 다양한 형태로 이루어졌다. 일제강점기 강제적 여성 동원의 대표적 희생자였던 여자근로정신대 문제는 개별적으로 소송이 진행되며 여전히 해결되지 않은 문제로 남아 있다. 전시총동원체제기 여성의 강제동원에 대한 실체를 밝히기 위해서는 관련 기구를 통해 지속적인 연구와 사회적 교육이 필요하다.

1894-1910년 한국과 일본 근대기록구조의 중층성과 종속성 - 전북지역 전략적 인프라구축기록을 중심으로 - (Layered and Dependent Structure of the Modern Official Documents in Korea and Japan (1894 - 1910): Focusing on the Documents Related with the Strategic Infrastructure Construction of Jeonbuk Province)

  • 김경남
    • 한국기록관리학회지
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.55-86
    • /
    • 2015
  • 본고의 목적은 1894년부터 1910년까지 한국과 일본 공문서관리시스템의 중층적 종속적 구조를 밝히는 것으로, 기록사료학적 관점에서 분석하고자 한다. 연구대상 시기는 일제가 한국의 기록관리제도를 장악하여 조선을 침탈해가던 시기로서 그 내용은 일본내각과 군부가 대륙침략전쟁을 위하여 한국에 구축한 인프라 관련 기록과 통감부 설치와 관련하여 결재된 원본문서이다. 특히 일본제국이 청일전쟁 동학농민전쟁을 진압하기 위해 전주를 중심으로 한 전북지역에 전략적으로 구축한 인프라기록을 중심으로 검토하였다. 이를 위해 갑오개혁기와 통감부시기에 걸쳐 일본정부가 한국을 지배하기 위해 작성한 정책 예산 인사 결정 관련 상위레벨의 결재 원본 출처와 편성 실태를 밝히고, 한국 내각과 통감부가 작성한 하위레벨 공문서 실태를 분석하였다. 그 결과 본 논문에서는 이 시기 한국의 공문서관리제도는 일국사적 관점에서만 고찰해서는 안되며, 한 일간 수직적 연관구조 속에서 중층적이고 종속적인 시스템 속에서 파악해야 한다는 점을 제기하였다.

일제강점기 '전위미술론'의 전통관 연구 - '문장(文章)' 그룹을 중심으로 (A Study on Avant-Garde Fine Art during the period of Japanese Colonial Rule of Korea, centering on 'Munjang' (a literary magazine))

  • 박계리
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제4호
    • /
    • pp.57-76
    • /
    • 2006
  • From the late 1920s to the 1930s, Korea's fine art community focused on traditional viewpoints as their main topic. The traditional viewpoints were discussed mainly by Korean students studying in Japan, especially oil painters. Such discussions on tradition can be divided into two separate halves, namely the pre- and post-Sino-Japanese War (1937) periods. Before the war, the modernists among Korea's fine art community tried to gain a fuller understanding of contemporary Western modern art, namely, expressionism, futurism, surrealism, and so forth, on the basis of Orientalism, and borrow from these schools' in order to create their own works. Furthermore, proponents of Joseon's avant-garde fine arts and artists of the pro-fine art school triggered debate on the traditional viewpoints. After the Sino-Japanese War, these artists continued to embrace Western modern art on the basis of Orientalism. However, since Western modern fine art was regressing into Oriental fine art during this period, Korean artists did not need to research Western modern fine art, but sought to study Joseon's classics and create Joseon's own avant- garde fine art in a movement led by the Munjang group. This research reviews the traditional view espoused by the Munjang group, which represented the avant-garde fine art movement of the post-war period. Advocating Joseon's own current of avant-garde fine art through the Munjang literary magazine, Gil Jin - seop, Kim Yong-jun and others accepted the Japanese fine art community's methodology for the restoration of classicism, but refused Orientalism as an ideology, and attempted to renew their perception of Joseon tradition. The advocation of the restoration of classicism by Gil Jin-seop and Kim Yong-jun appears to be similar to that of the Yasuda Yojuro-style restoration of classicism. However, Gil Jin-seop and Kim Yong-jun did not seek their sources of classicism from the Three-Kingdoms and Unified Silla periods, which Japan had promoted as a symbol of unity among the Joseon people; instead they sought classicism from the Joseon fine art which the Japanese had criticized as a hotbed of decadence. It was the Joseon period that the Munjang group chose as classicism when Japan was upholding Fascism as a contemporary extremism, and when Hangeul (Korean writing system) was banned from schools. The group highly evaluated literature written in the style of women, especially women's writings on the royal court, as represented by Hanjungnok (A Story of Sorrowful Days). In the area of fine art, the group renewed the evaluation of not only literary paintings, but also of the authentic landscape paintings refused by, and the values of the Chusa school criticized as decadent by, the colonial bureaucratic artists, there by making great progress in promoting the traditional viewpoint. Kim Yong-jun embraced a painting philosophy based on the painting techniques of Sasaeng (sketching), because he paid keen attention to the tradition of literary paintings, authentic landscape paintings and genre paintings. The literary painting theory of the 20th century, which was highly developed, could naturally shed both the colonial historical viewpoint which regarded Joseon fine art as heteronomical, and the traditional viewpoint which regarded Joseon fine art as decadent. As such, the Munjang group was able to embrace the Joseon period as the source of classicism amid the prevalent colonial historical viewpoint, presumably as it had accumulated first-hand experience in appreciating curios of paintings and calligraphic works, instead of taking a logical approach. Kim Yong-jun, in his fine art theory, defined artistic forms as the expression of mind, and noted that such an artistic mind could be attained by the appreciation of nature and life. This is because, for the Munjang group, the experience of appreciating nature and life begins with the appreciation of curios of paintings and calligraphic works. Furthermore, for the members of the Munjang group, who were purists who valued artistic style, the concept of individuality presumably was an engine that protected them from falling into the then totalitarian world view represented by the Nishita philosophy. Such a 20th century literary painting theory espoused by the Munjang group concurred with the contemporary traditional viewpoint spearheaded by Oh Se-chang in the 1910s. This theory had a great influence on South and North Korea's fine art theories and circles through the Fine Art College of Seoul National University and Pyongyang Fine Art School in the wake of Korea's liberation. In this sense, the significance of the theory should be re-evaluated.

  • PDF