• Title/Summary/Keyword: Simulated conducted hearing loss

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Speech Perception and Gap Detection Performance of Single-Sided Deafness under Noisy Conditions

  • Kwak, Chanbeom;Kim, Saea;Lee, Jihyeon;Seo, Youngjoon;Kong, Taehoon;Han, Woojae
    • Journal of Audiology & Otology
    • /
    • v.23 no.4
    • /
    • pp.197-203
    • /
    • 2019
  • Background and Objectives: Many studies have reported no benefit of sound localization, but improved speech understanding in noise after treating patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). Furthermore, their performances provided a large individual difference. The present study aimed to measure the ability of speech perception and gap detection in noise for the SSD patients to better understand their hearing nature. Subjects and Methods: Nine SSD patients with different onset and period of hearing deprivation and 20 young adults with normal hearing and simulated conductive hearing loss as the control groups conducted speech perception in noise (SPIN) and Gap-In-Noise (GIN) tests. The SPIN test asked how many presented sentences were understood at the +5 and -5 dB signal-to-noise ratio. The GIN test was asked to find the shortest gap in white noise with different lengths in the gap. Results: Compared to the groups with normal hearing and simulated instant hearing loss, the SSD group showed much poor performance in both SPIN and GIN tests while supporting central auditory plasticity of the SSD patients. Rather than a longer period of deafness, the large individual variance indicated that the congenital SSD patients showed better performance than the acquired SSD patients in two measurements. Conclusions: The results suggested that comprehensive assessments should be implemented before any treatment of the SSD patient considering their onset time and etiology, although these findings need to be generalized with a large sample size.

Speech Perception and Gap Detection Performance of Single-Sided Deafness under Noisy Conditions

  • Kwak, Chanbeom;Kim, Saea;Lee, Jihyeon;Seo, Youngjoon;Kong, Taehoon;Han, Woojae
    • Korean Journal of Audiology
    • /
    • v.23 no.4
    • /
    • pp.197-203
    • /
    • 2019
  • Background and Objectives: Many studies have reported no benefit of sound localization, but improved speech understanding in noise after treating patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). Furthermore, their performances provided a large individual difference. The present study aimed to measure the ability of speech perception and gap detection in noise for the SSD patients to better understand their hearing nature. Subjects and Methods: Nine SSD patients with different onset and period of hearing deprivation and 20 young adults with normal hearing and simulated conductive hearing loss as the control groups conducted speech perception in noise (SPIN) and Gap-In-Noise (GIN) tests. The SPIN test asked how many presented sentences were understood at the +5 and -5 dB signal-to-noise ratio. The GIN test was asked to find the shortest gap in white noise with different lengths in the gap. Results: Compared to the groups with normal hearing and simulated instant hearing loss, the SSD group showed much poor performance in both SPIN and GIN tests while supporting central auditory plasticity of the SSD patients. Rather than a longer period of deafness, the large individual variance indicated that the congenital SSD patients showed better performance than the acquired SSD patients in two measurements. Conclusions: The results suggested that comprehensive assessments should be implemented before any treatment of the SSD patient considering their onset time and etiology, although these findings need to be generalized with a large sample size.

Comparison of Human Responses to Transportation Noise in Monaural and Binaural Hearing, Part II: Annoyance (교통소음의 모노럴과 바이노럴 청감 비교 연구 II: 성가심)

  • Kim, Jaehwan;Lim, Chang-Woo;Hong, Jiyoung;Jeong, Wontae;Cheung, Wansup;Lee, Soogab
    • Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering
    • /
    • v.14 no.12
    • /
    • pp.1279-1286
    • /
    • 2004
  • This paper continues companion paper, part I : measurement and analysis. As shown in companion Paper, information and energy in monaural signal is quite different from that of binaural signal. In this paper, difference between monaural and binaural signal of transportation noise are investigated in subjective response test. We executed hearing screening test before giving a subject response test and excluded subjects who had physical hearing loss. An annoyance response test was conducted using headphone to avoid cross-talk effect in binaural testing. Percentage of highly annoyed under binaural signal reproduction is higher than percentage of highly annoyed under monaural signal reproduction. Result implies binaural reproduction technique is proper for a study of human response to short-term noise exposure in a headphone simulated-environment.