• Title/Summary/Keyword: Silicone bloc

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Medialization Thyroplasty with Silastic- Decision Making & Practical Points (Silastic을 이용한 내전 갑상성형술-적용 및 술기)

  • Choi, Hong-Shik
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedics
    • /
    • v.18 no.1
    • /
    • pp.7-10
    • /
    • 2007
  • Unilateral vocal fold paralysis resulting in glottal incompetence can cause significant morbidity attributable to impaired speech, swallowing, and ability to protect the airway. The treatment of unilateral vocal cord paralysis has a long history, marked by technical innovations and improvements. These methods typically use endoscopic injection or implants to augment the volume of the affected vocal fold. The first known treatment, reported by Brunnings in 1911, was paraffin injection. The first thyroplasty medializing the paralysed vocal cord was performed by Payr in 1915 ; here, a cartilage door-flap was created from the thyroid ala to obtain better voice quality. In the 1970s, Isshiki systematized and developed the use of the external medialization by Payr. Later he modified his original technique, and achieved safer and better results. Many other methods were introduced for external medialization during the 1980s and 1990s. There has been couple of materials using for medialization laryngoplasty: silicone bloc, cartilage, goretex (polytetrafluoroethylene), titanium, etc. Among them, silicone bloc is the most popularly used material. Type I thyroplasty in combination with arytenoid adduction is a proven technique for medialization of the paralysed vocal fold. In this paper, personal experience for using silicone bloc type I thyroplasty : decision making and practical points, long-term results and complication of the procedure will be discussed.

  • PDF

Comparison of Physical & Histological Change of Alloplastic Implants after Implantation in Rat (흰쥐에 삽입된 인공성형삽입물의 생체내 물리, 조직학적 변화의 비교)

  • Kim, Sung Nam;Noh, Bok Kyun;Kim, Eui Sik;Hwang, Jae Ha;Kim, Kwang Seog;Lee, Sam Yong;Cho, Bek Hyun
    • Archives of Plastic Surgery
    • /
    • v.33 no.2
    • /
    • pp.219-224
    • /
    • 2006
  • Augmentation rhinoplasty is one of the most popular aesthetic procedure in Asians. Numerous alloplastic implants have been used until now, but no accurate comparative analysis about the implant materials has been reported yet. This study in animal model was designed to determine the safety and effectiveness of various implant materials in augmentation rhinoplasty. The $15{\times}15{\times}2mm$ sized square shaped plate of $Gore-Tex^{(R)}$, silicone rubber, and $15{\times}15{\times}1.5mm$ sized $Medpor^{(R)}$ were implanted under panniculus carnosus of the abdomen wall of rat. And tissue specimens including the implant and surrounding soft tissue were obtained by en bloc excision in 6 months after implantation. The implants were estimated in weight and volume, and also the specimens were examined grossly and microscopically. The results revealed that increase of average weight 26.9%, decrease of average volume 55.4% in $Gore-Tex^{(R)}$ implant, increase of each average weight and volume 62.6%, 8.7% in $Medpor^{(R)}$ implant and very slight increase of both average weight and volume 4.7%, 1.1% in silicone rubber implant. Grossly, the $Gore-Tex^{(R)}$ was deformed, $Medpor^{(R)}$ was strongly adherent to surrounding soft tissue and the silicone rubber was well encapsulated and easily peeled off. Microscopically, silicone rubber showed foreign body reaction slightly and there were no inflammatory responses in all alloplastic implants. In our study, silicone rubber showed very proper alloplastic features for augmentation rhinoplasty due to causing no inflammatory response, no physical change, and no deformity.

Infective Costochondritis after Augmentation Mammoplasty: A Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature

  • Sally Min;Jinil Choi;Kwon Joong Na;Ki Yong Hong
    • Archives of Plastic Surgery
    • /
    • v.50 no.5
    • /
    • pp.488-491
    • /
    • 2023
  • Silicone breast implant insertion is a commonly performed surgical procedure for breast augmentation or reconstruction. Among various postoperative complications, infection is one of the main causes of patient readmission and may ultimately require explantation. We report a case of infective costochondritis after augmentation mammoplasty, which has rarely been reported and is therefore difficult to diagnose. A 36-year-old female visited the clinic for persistent redness, pain, and purulent discharge around the left anteromedial chest, even after breast implant explantation. Magnetic resonance imaging showed abscess formation encircling the left fourth rib and intracartilaginous and bone marrow signal alteration at the left body of the sternum and left fourth rib. En bloc resection of partial rib and adjacent sternum were done and biopsy results confirmed infective costochondritis. Ten months postoperatively, the patient underwent chest wall reconstruction with an artificial bone graft and acellular dermal matrix. As shown in this case, early and aggressive surgical debridement of the infected costal cartilage and sternum should be performed for infective costochondritis. Furthermore, delayed chest wall reconstruction could significantly contribute to the quality of life.