• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제14권9호
• /
• pp.851-860
• /
• 2005

In order to how well predict ISCST3(lndustrial Source Complex Short Term version 3) model dispersion of air pollutant at point source, sensitivity was analysed necessary parameters change. ISCST3 model is Gaussian plume model. Model calculation was performed with change of the wind speed, atmospheric stability and mixing height while the wind direction and ambient temperature are fixed. Fixed factors are wind direction as the south wind(l80") and temperature as 298 K(25 "C). Model's sensitivity is analyzed as wind speed, atmospheric stability and mixing height change. Data of stack are input by inner diameter of 2m, stack height of 30m, emission temperature of 40 "C, outlet velocity of 10m/s. On the whole, main factor which affects in atmospheric dispersion is wind speed and atmospheric stability at ISCST3 model. However it is effect of atmospheric stability rather than effect of distance downwind. Factor that exert big influence in determining point of maximum concentration is wind speed. Meanwhile, influence of mixing height is a little or almost not.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.116-122
• /
• 2012

미국 원자력규제위원회(U. S. NRC)에서 개발한 PAVAN 프로그램을 사용하여 기상자료의 통계처리방법에 따른 원자력발전소의 수명기간 중 발생할 수 있는 가상 사고시 단기 대기확산인자 값의 영향을 분석하였다. 대기확산을 평가하기 위한 기본요소는 기상자료이며, PAVAN에서는 대기안정도에 대한 풍향과 풍속의 발생빈도를 나타내는 결합빈도분포자료를 사용하여 평가한다. 고리와 월성 원자력발전소 부지에서 2006~2010년까지 5년간 관측된 기상자료를 사용하여 풍속등급의 분류방법(U. S. NRC 권고와 균등발생빈도 분류방법)과 평가에 적용되는 기상자료의 통계처리기간(1년, 2년, 3년, 4년, 5년)에 따른 결합빈도분포자료를 작성하여 단기 대기확산인자를 평가하였다. 평가결과, 두 원자력발전소 부지 모두 풍속등급의 분류에 따른 단기 대기확산인자 값의 영향은 미미한 반면 평가에 적용되는 기상자료의 분석기간은 상대적으로 중요한 영향을 나타냈는데, 최대값과 최소값의 비는 1.5배 이상의 차이를 보였다.

• 한국대기환경학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.392-402
• /
• 2010

Black carbon (BC) concentrations were measured with an aethalometer (AE-16, 880 nm) at time interval of 5-min at an urban site of Gwangju over a year 2008. 24-hr filter-based integrated measurements of $PM_{2.5}$ particles were also made at the same site during the winter and summer intensive periods to test any optical loading bias in the raw BC data measured by aethalometer. BC concentration was higher in winter than in summer, possibly due to increase in emissions from energy consumption and poor dispersion with reduction of boundary layer in winter. Also temporal cycles of BC indicate that short-term transient spikes were common, occurring primarily during the rush-hour periods. A similar feature was also observed in diurnal concentration cycle of CO, mainly emitted from motor vehicles. When both low wind speed and weather patterns such as mist, haze and etc were combined, high BC concentrations frequently occurred. The amount of optical loading effect described by the "k" factor showed the seasonal variation, ranging from 0.0003 to 0.0036. This implies that optical loading effect is not seen at all times. From the comparison between the filter-based elemental carbon (EC) and aethalometer BC data, it was found that the loading compensated BC values were more reasonable than the raw BC ones reported from the aethalometer.