• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2007년도 추계학술대회 및 제23회 정기총회
• /
• pp.51-55
• /
• 2007

이 글은 선박매매에 관하여 해사법상 법률관계와 영국 보통법상 판례의 판결 그리고 한국 해운산업에 대하여 몇 가지 입법적 제언으로 구성한다. 최근 신조선박의 수주량과 거래는 대부분 동아시아의 한국, 일본 그리고 중국에서 형성되고 있다 특히 한국의 주요 조선소들은 규모를 확대하고 있고 LNG(액화천연가스) 수송을 위한 새로운 해운산업을 개척하고 있다. 여기에 한국의 정부도 점차 인터넷을 통한 중고선박매매의 활성화에 관심을 두고 있으며, 한국해운거래소를 설립할 계획도 모색하고 있다. 그러므로 이 글은 선박매매의 법적 특질, 선박매매의 표준서식, 및 선박매매에 관한 해사법상 문제점 과 개선방안을 제언함으로 결론적으로 해사법상 선박매매의 입법적 제시와 한국형 선박매매서식의 제작, 해사법상 선박매매에 관한 현행법 제 ${\cdot}$ 개정 및 특별법제정과 한국해운거래소 설립의 필요성을 제언한다.

• 한국항해학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.65-113
• /
• 1983

A lot of studies of ship's economy are on the traditional fields such asreducing propulsion resistance, raising cargo handling rates and lessening building consts, but there are few researches on the merchant ship's economy concerning their deadweights and speeds according to shipping companies managerial cercumstances. Contrary to the contemporary trend that "the bigger, the better, if the cargo handling rate could increased sufficiently to hold down port time to that rate of smmaler vessels", this paper demonstrates the existence of certain limits in ship's size and speed according to the coditions of the freight rates, voyage distances, cargo handing rates, prices of fuel oil, interst rates etc. Fom the curves of criteria contour for various ship's deadweights and speeds which are depicted from the gird search method, one can get the costs and the yearly profit rates under the conditiions of large volume with long term contracts for the transportation of bulk cargoes. In estimating ship's transportation economy, the auther takes the position that the profit rate method is properer than the cost method, and introduces the calculation table of the voyage profit rate index. The use of the criteria contours will be of help to ship owners in determining the size and speed of the ship which will be built or purchased and serve in a certain trade route.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제64권
• /
• pp.155-185
• /
• 2014

Liability for the manufacture or supply of defective products can arise in two principle ways, in tort and in contract. English law has long regarded shipbuilding contract as agreement for the sale and purchase of goods. The consequence of which is that unless the Buyer and Builder agree otherwise, terms will automatically be implied into the contract between them as to the quality and performance of the completed vessel. The same principle applies to sub-contracts allied to the shipbuilding contract. On the other hand, one case decisions established that ".... a contract to build a ship, though a contract of sale of goods, has also some characteristics of a building contract", Recently the liability of a manufacturer in tort for physical damage i.e. personal injury and damage to property other than alleged to be defective is now well settled in most countries. Accordingly the Builder may face third party claims in tort more regularly than they have in the past, if the statutory implied terms have not been expressly excluded in contract. In such circumstances, it is necessary for the Builder to be prepared with counter measures to secure the stability of the vessel from its design development, building process, delivery and operation etc. The purpose of this paper is, from the case of "MSC Carla", to review product liability, jurisdiction and the initial date of extinctive prescription, then to suggest counter measures to the Builder.