• Title/Summary/Keyword: Sequential confidence interval

Search Result 33, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Association between Participation in a Rehabilitation Program and 1-Year Survival in Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

  • Wanho Yoo;Myung Hun Jang;Sang Hun Kim;Soohan Kim;Eun-Jung Jo;Jung Seop Eom;Jeongha Mok;Mi-Hyun Kim;Kwangha Lee
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • v.86 no.2
    • /
    • pp.133-141
    • /
    • 2023
  • Background: The present study evaluated the association between participation in a rehabilitation program during a hospital stay and 1-year survival of patients requiring at least 21 days of mechanical ventilation (prolonged mechanical ventilation [PMV]) with various respiratory diseases as their main diagnoses that led to mechanical ventilation. Methods: Retrospective data of 105 patients (71.4% male, mean age 70.1±11.3 years) who received PMV in the past 5 years were analyzed. Rehabilitation included physiotherapy, physical rehabilitation, and dysphagia treatment program that was individually provided by physiatrists. Results: The main diagnosis leading to mechanical ventilation was pneumonia (n=101, 96.2%) and the 1-year survival rate was 33.3% (n=35). One-year survivors had lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (20.2±5.8 vs. 24.2±7.5, p=0.006) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (6.7±5.6 vs. 8.5±2.7, p=0.001) on the day of intubation than non-survivors. More survivors participated in a rehabilitation program during their hospital stays (88.6% vs. 57.1%, p=0.001). The rehabilitation program was an independent factor for 1-year survival based on the Cox proportional hazard model (hazard ratio, 3.513; 95% confidence interval, 1.785 to 6.930; p<0.001) in patients with APACHE II scores ≤23 (a cutoff value based on Youden's index). Conclusion: Our study showed that participation in a rehabilitation program during hospital stay was associated with an improvement of 1-year survival of PMV patients who had less severe illness on the day of intubation.

Seven-day and In-hospital Mortality According to Left and Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Septic Shock

  • Sua Kim;Hyeri Seok;Beong Ki Kim;Yu Jin Kim;Seung Heon Lee;Je Hyeong Kim;Yong-Hyun Kim
    • Korean Circulation Journal
    • /
    • v.53 no.12
    • /
    • pp.813-825
    • /
    • 2023
  • Background and Objectives: The prognostic implications of septic cardiomyopathy have not been clearly demonstrated. We evaluated serial changes in left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function in patients with septic shock and their prognostic value on 7-day and in-hospital mortality. Methods: Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 48 hours of the diagnosis of septic shock and 7 days after the initial evaluation. In addition to traditional echocardiographic parameters, LV and RV function was evaluated using global longitudinal strain (GLS), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Results: A total of 162 patients (men, 83, 51.5%; 70.7±13.4 years; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II, 30.6±9.2) were enrolled. Initial GLS and TAPSE were -14.9±5.2% and 16.9±5.5 mm, and improved in the follow-up evaluation (GLS, -17.6±4.9%; TAPSE, 19.2±5.4 mm). Seven-day and in-hospital mortality were 24 (14.9%) and 64 (39.8%). Seven-day mortality was significantly associated with initial GLS >-16% (odds ratio [OR], 14.066, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.178-167.969, p=0.037) and APACHE II score (OR, 1.196, 95% CI, 1.047-1.365, p=0.008). The in-hospital mortality of 7-day survivors was associated with follow-up TAPSE <16 mm (OR, 10.109, 95% CI, 1.640-62.322, p=0.013) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (OR, 1.340, 95% CI, 1.078-1.667, p=0.008). GLS was not associated with in-hospital mortality of 7-day survivors. Conclusions: Fluctuation of both ventricular function was common in septic shock. Seven-day mortality of patients with septic shock was related to GLS, whereas in-hospital mortality of 7-day survivors was related to TAPSE, not to GLS.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with septic shock who transferred to the emergency department in tertiary referral center: multicenter, retrospective, observational study (상급종합병원 및 종합병원 응급실로 전원된 패혈성 쇼크 환자의 특성과 예후: 다기관 후향적 관찰연구)

  • Kim, Min Gyun;Shin, Tae Gun;Jo, Ik Joon;Kim, Won Young;Ryoo, Seung Mok;Chung, Sung Phil;Beom, Jin Ho;Choi, Sung-Hyuk;Kim, Kyuseok;Jo, You Hwan;Kang, Gu Hyun;Suh, Gil Joon;Shin, Jonghwan;Lim, Tae Ho;Han, Kap Su;Hwang, Sung Yeon;Korean Shock Society (KoSS)
    • Journal of The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
    • /
    • v.29 no.5
    • /
    • pp.465-473
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objective: We evaluated the clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients with septic shock who transferred to the emergency department (ED) in a tertiary referral center. Methods: This study was performed using a prospective, multi-center registry of septic shock, with the participation of 11 tertiary referral centers in the Korean Shock Society between October 2015 and February 2017. We classified the patients as a transferred group who transferred from other hospitals after meeting the inclusion criteria upon ED arrival and a non-transferred group who presented directly to the ED. Primary outcome was hospital mortality. We conducted multiple logistic regression analysis to assess variables related to in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 2,098 patients were included, and we assigned 717 patients to the transferred group and 1,381 patients to the non-transferred group. The initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was higher in the transferred group than the non-transferred group (6; interquartile range [IQR], 4-9 vs. 6; IQR, 4-8; P<0.001). Mechanical ventilator (29% vs. 21%, P<0.001) and renal replacement therapy (12% vs. 9%, P=0.034) within 24 hours after ED arrival were more frequently applied in the transferred group than the non-transferred group. Overall hospital mortality was 22% and there was no significant difference between transferred and non-transferred groups (23% vs. 22%, P=0.820). Multivariable analysis showed an odds ratio for in-hospital mortality of 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.28; P=0.999) for the transferred group compared with the non-transferred group. Conclusion: The transferred group showed higher severity and needed more organ support procedures than the non-transferred group. However, inter-hospital transfer did not affect in-hospital mortality.