• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권15호
• /
• pp.1-30
• /
• 2018

This study focused on how to supplement and develop military spiritual education in response to promotion of peace and prosperity and Change of Security Environment on the Korean Peninsula. In order to succeed in the peace and prosperity on the Korean Peninsula policy, Strengthening the military spiritual education is necessary. This study was analyzed through the survey and the results are as follows: First, the awareness level of military spiritual education is more than 68%. Second, the satisfaction level of education has been quit motivated, but, the respondents demands various methods of eduction. Third, the current mental power scores showed no significant difference for environmental change. In addition, based on the results of the research, the problem of military spiritual education is as follows. It is not enough to secure the identity that can firmly support the era of peace and prosperity on the Korean peninsula. Poor budget support might hinder improving poor education facilities and outdated equipment. Furthermore, there is a lack of research on future-oriented educational system in support of traditional education methods of repetition-type repeated education and unification. Therefore, we deducted the following development strategies for the military spiritual education in this paper. First, it is necessary to strengthen the military spiritual education to support the era of peace and prosperity on the Korean Peninsula. Second, for enhancing educational environments, the educational facilities and equipments should be improved by understanding the characteristics of the education target. Third, the integrated management of military research institutes specialized in military spiritual education should be pursued as a system development for ensuring the continuous effect of education. In conclusion, continuous attention and research are needed to establish national perspective and national security perspective, raise the military spirit and utilize various education development programs in order to develop efficient military spiritual education in the future.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.457-465
• /
• 2024

21세기 들어 글로벌 안보 환경은 급격한 변화를 겪고 있으며, 한국은 복합적인 안보 딜레마에 직면해 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 배경에서 한국의 새로운 국가 안보 전략으로서 '적극적 평화' 구축 방안을 모색하고자 한다. 요한 갈퉁의 '적극적 평화' 개념에 기반하여, 본 연구는 한반도 평화 프로세스 재설계, 동북아 다자안보협력체제 구축, 글로벌 평화 기여 확대, 국내 사회통합 및 평화 문화 확산 등을 통해 구조적 폭력을 제거하고 지속가능한 평화를 구축하는 전략을 제시한다. 이를 실현하기 위한 국가 체제 개편 방안으로는 군의 역할 재정립, 국방 예산의 재분배와 평화배당금 개념 도입, 과학기술의 평화적 활용 촉진, 평화권 실현을 위한 법제도 정비 등을 논의한다. '적극적 평화' 전략의 실현은 한국이 평화 선도국가로 도약하고, 한반도와 동북아, 나아가 글로벌 평화에 기여하는 비전을 제시하는데 기여할 것이다.

• 기술사
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.17-26
• /
• 2000

This study has been done to make a practical suggestion in figuring out required size of electricity power facility in preparation for reunion of Korean Peninsula, estimated based on capacity increase and demand changes in the past. In making the suggestion, balanced development of South and North Korea Economy, recovery of existing power facilities, and construction of new power facilities were taken into consideration. As an alternatives, study result of power system interconnections in Korean Peninsula and/or in North-East Asia Region, PEACE Network, is suggested with a cooperation scheme of information and communications technology as an extra advantage. Concluded a cooperation of electric power system and information & communications technology in the peninsula is expected to be a great opportunity in developing electric power economy, maintaining clear environment, improving security of power supply in the region, and in reunion of Korean Peninsula and peace in the world.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권13호
• /
• pp.43-81
• /
• 2016

Security environment we face in the Korean Peninsula is unexpectable. Tensions between Seoul and Pyeongyang and its threats are continuously evolving. Kim Jung Un will keep on conducting provocations and DPRK's isolation will result uncertainty to their objective and intention. KPA is centered on ground forces with conventional weapons but they possess modernized missiles and nuclear capabilities. What's more concerning is that North Korea continuously pursue and develop nuclear weapons and missile capabilities. Pursuing defense reform is inevitable for the ROK to deal adequately against the security threats posed by the North and to prepare for the environment of future warfare. If we are satisfied with the current capabilities then our military capabilities and security status will retrogress. We have to reorganize our units to make a small but FMC, smart military organization. Organization analysis is an urgent issue for reorganizing units. However, it isn't an easy task to reform an organization. There are vague parts for analysis and strong resistance from the people within the organization. Therefore should not focus on the reduction of people and the organization. Organization reform should be done with the acknowledgement of most of the personnel and should focus on the task and its method. These should be reflected to the organization analysis.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.591-601
• /
• 2020

After North Korea's sixth nuclear test, the operational environment on the Korean Peninsula has fundamentally changed, and the South Korean military faces various security challenges, including a reduction in military service resources and shorter military service periods. In particular, the South Korean military is seeking a new paradigm in military construction amid changes in the defense acquisition environment linked to the push for defense reform 2.0 and the utilization of the fourth industrial revolution. Therefore, this study considered strategies for improving the operational test and evaluation of weapons systems suitable for changes in the defense acquisition environment to effectively prepare for existing military threats and future warfare patterns. For this purpose, external environment analysis and internal capabilities were diagnosed using PEST Analysis and SPRO Analysis, and improvement strategies were derived through SWOT analysis.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권8호
• /
• pp.239-270
• /
• 2010

This thesis is to make an appropriate national defense policy of Republic of Korea through studying the Hegemony Strategy of United States. I searched the theory of hegemony. The hegemony was differently defined by the point of time and region. The strong power nations with the hegemony have been making efforts to maintain their hegemony everytime. I have conclusion that the presence of hegemony once emerged, it brought regional stability in place whether it is coercive or beneficial. The stability and instability of international order IS not exclusively dependent on hegemony. Even if the safety of hegemony cannot guarantee absolute stability of international order, there IS on doubt that the hegemony has enormous impact on that. According to the hegemonic theory, the history of mankind equals to the history of rising and falling hegemony. The international order was changed as the hegemony changes. The United States has been making efforts to maintain her global hegemony during the post cold-war era as well. Taking all these into consideration, relevant military strategy direction able to pursue national interest is that to make up for the relative weakness in the strategic environment. South Korea have to prepare security policy response as following. First, South Korea should build the military force equipped with advanced weapons in military technology sector and solidify military diplomatic relation able to form cooperative relation in wartime. Second, South Korea should make solid Alliance of Korea and U.S. Third, develop and maintain multilateral security cooperation of East Asia. Forth, we could realize that there are means that can neutralize opponent's strong point by seeking one or two and more asymmetry in the aspect of strategy, tactics, and means through asymmetric strategy. Than the military force of South Korea should develop into a force that is able to overcome to the traditional North Korea's threat and new type of conflicts. And the force should have sufficient strength and be deployed to effectively defend the Korean Peninsula. So, we need to establish a denial and defense system against any hostile neighboring country. Therefore, ROK military forces preparing for the future should try to construct a future military power to gradually establish enough strength for self-defense to prepare for a uncertain security environment and when the Korean Peninsula is unified in a future.

• 국제지역연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.277-295
• /
• 2016

한반도의 안보환경은 매우 불안정하게 흘러가고 있다. 그 불안정의 요인에는 북한의 핵무기 개발과 실험, 특히 2016년 1월6일의 4차 핵실험과 연이은 2월7일의 장거리미사일(ICBM)발사 그리고 2월8일 NLL침범과 함께 개성공단의 폐쇄조치 등이다. 그리고 일본의 아베정권의 지나친 우경화와 영토권 분쟁, 드리고 중국의 남지나해에서 각국과의 섬 영토분쟁등과 같은 역내 갈등의 고조이다. 동북아 각국의 상호이해관계는 자국의 이익을 위하여 안전을 확보한 상태에서 대외교전과 경제전을 수행하는 것이다. 사실 우리의 입장에서 이것은 매우 중요한 국가의 이슈로 지금까지 진행해오는 중요한 문제이다. 하지만 어떠한 정책도 국민의 굶주림과 행복을 빼앗아가면서 시행하고 발전시켜서는 안된다. 그것은 민본에 어긋나는 행위이다. 국가이든 단체든 국가 이익의 최우선 목표가 국민행복, 국가안전이어야 한다. 그렇지 못하면 국가의 주권도 국가로서 존재가치도 상실하게 된다. 특히 주변국 상황을 볼 때 전례 없는 세계 경제위기에도 불구하고 주변국들은 국방비를 높은 수준으로 증액하고 있다. 이런 시기에 우리의 국방력이 현재수준에 머문다면 미래에는 군사력 격차가 더욱 심화될 것이다. 따라서 본 연구는 이러한 상황을 인식하여 동북아 안보환경의 급격한 변화 문제를 검토하고 향후 남북통일로 가기 위한 국가의 총역량 결집을 뒷받침해주는 국방비의 수준을 검토한 것이다.

• 대한조선학회논문집
• /
• 제53권4호
• /
• pp.249-257
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is finding the key factors for navy to determine the necessity of naval ship PIP(Performance Improvement Program) against the altered battle field environment and politics. Recently, leading countries try to cope actively with the changing international circumstances and technology development trend in the commercial industry. In the case of domestic situation, based on the regulation, it is possible to modify the ship configurations by PIP, but there are not enough criteria and references to make a decision of necessity for the PIP program considering the naval ship acquisition planning by navy. It is necessary to acquire the obvious decision criteria for determination of PIP commencement, by the operational, political and security environment around the Korean peninsula. Considering these conditions, this study proposes the factors necessary for naval ship PIP for navy.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제58호
• /
• pp.107-135
• /
• 2019

본 논문의 목적은 한국과 미국의 안보환경, 정보 조직 및 정보활동의 유사성과 차이점을 비교분석하는데 있다. 이 같은 비교는 정보 전반에 대한 통찰력과 폭넓은 이해를 제공함으로써 정보연구의 방법론적 발전은 물론 한국 및 여타 국가정보기관에 대한 통찰력을 제공해줄 것이다. 한미 양국의 역사와 문화, 그리고 국력이 상이한 만큼 정보기관의 조직과 활동 역시 다를 수 밖에 없다. 우선 환경면에서 보면 미국은 북미 대륙국가들은 물론 남미와 중동, 아시아 그리고 아시아지역까지 광범위한 영역에서 국익과 안보를 위해 정보활동을 수행하고 있는 반면, 한국의 정보활동은 주로 북한과 한반도 주변 국가들을 대상으로 이루어지고 있다. 정보조직적인 측면에서 보면 미국의 정보기관들은 국내외 정보 및 수사기관이 분리된 분리형 정보기관인 데 비해, 한국의 정보기관은 미국과 달리 정보와 수사가 결합된 통합형 정보기관의 유형에 해당된다. 또한 미국의 경우 정보공동체(Intelligence Community)로 운영되면서 계층 조직이외 센터와 같은 유연한 조직들이 많이 있는 점도 한국과 상이하다. 미국 정보기관의 정보활동은 분석과 해외공작활동에 주안을 두고 있는데 비해 한국의 정보기관은 여전히 국내 정보활동이 많은 비중을 차지하고 있다. 이 같은 차이에도 한국의 정보기관이 미국 정보기관을 모방하여 창설한 만큼 안보위협의 평가, 조직과 활동면에서 유사한 측면도 있다. 그러나 이와 같은 유사성은 모든 정보기관이 공유하고 있기 때문에 이 글에서는 차이점을 위주로 분석할 것이다. 마지막으로 한국의 정보기관의 발전을 위해 정보공동체의 설립과 국회의 효율적인 통제 등의 방안을 제시할 것이다.

• Strategy21
• /
• 통권30호
• /
• pp.63-98
• /
• 2012

Northeast Asia has a multi-layered security structure within which major economic and military powers both confront one another and cooperate at the same time. Major regional powers maintain mutually cooperative activities in the economic sphere while competing one another in order to secure a dominant position in the politico-military arena. The multifarious threats, posed by the North Korea's nuclear development, territorial disputes, and maritime demarcation line issues demonstrate that Northeast Asia suffers more from military conflicts and strifes than any other region in the world. Specifically, major maritime security threats include North Korea's nuclear proliferation and missile launching problems as well as military provocations nearby the Northern Limit Line(NLL) as witnessed in the Cheonan naval ship and Yeonpyong incidents. The ROK Navy has been supplementing its firm military readiness posture in consideration of North Korea's threats on the NLL. It has performed superb roles in defending the nation and establishing the Navy advanced and best picked. It also has been conducive to defend the nation from external military threats and invasion, secure the sea lanes of communications, and establish regional stability and world peace. In order to effectively cope with the strategic environment and future warfares, the ROK Navy needs to shift its military structure to one that is more information and technology intensive. In addition, it should consolidate the ROK-US alliance and extend military cooperative measures with neighboring countries in the Asia-Pacific region. Evolved steadily for the last 60 years, the ROK-US alliance format has contributed to peace and security on the Korean peninsula and in the Northeast Asian region. In conclusion, this manuscript contends that the ROK Navy should strive for the establishment of the following: (1) Construction of Jeju Naval Base; (2) Strategic Navy Equipped with War Deterrence Capabilities; (3) Korean-type of System of Systems; (4) Structure, Budget and Human Resources of the Naval Forces Similar to the Advanced Countries; and (5) Strategic Maritime Alliance and Alignment System as well as Domestic Governance Network for the Naval Families.