• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.483-492
• /
• 2017

이 연구의 목적은 초등학생들이 과학적 가설을 생성하는 동안에 나타나는 동공크기의 변화를 분석하는데 있다. 연구 참여자는 서울소재의 B초등학교 5학년 학생들 중 자발적으로 연구에 참여하기를 희망하는 학생들 20명으로 구성하였다. 과제는 4개의 과학적 가설 생성과제로 이루어졌으며, 안구운동 데이터를 얻기 위해서 SMI사의 안구운동 추적기(iView $X^{TM}$ RED)기를 사용하였다. Experiment 3.6와 BeGaze 3.6 프로그램을 사용하여 실험을 계획하고 수행하였으며, 안구운동을 수집하여 분석하였다. 연구결과는 두 가지이다. 첫째, 실험과제에 대해 가설을 생성하는 유형으로 4가지 유형이 나타났다. 둘째, 가설을 생성할 때 동공크기의 특징 있는 변화가 있었으며, 가설을 생성하기 위해 생각하거나 가설을 정교화 하는 과정에서는 큰 변화가 없었다. 이와 같은 연구 결과로 볼 때, 가설을 생성하는 순간에는 인지적 요인 외에 감성적 요인의 영향을 받는 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.441-450
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of elementary gifted students' argumentation and examine the special features of argumentation founded in scientific inquiry. 28 students were selected in the special education center for the gifted in K National University. They were organized 8 groups of 3~4 students and engaged in scientific inquiry activity. The researcher wasn't involved in students' inquiry activity and argumentation except for the guiding and introducing their activity. In the first session, each group carried out the experiment 'Putting a heated can in the water' and then, the students discussed to probe their experimental results and build their explanation. In the second session, each group presented their experiment results and evidence from their experiment justifying their claims, and had questions from other groups. The protocol data during 8 groups' argumentations were analyzed using 'Rubric for Scientific Argumentation Assessment' (Yang et al., 2009) in three domains- the form, content and attitude. As a result, in form domain, almost groups were rated 2 points due to their argument without rebuttal on the subcategory of 'composition', but they got a good grade above 3 points in subcategory such as 'claim', 'ground', and 'conclusion'. In content domain, almost groups got points above 3 points. In attitude domain, there were some striking contrast between each groups. Six groups got good score more than 4 points on the subcategory of openness, but two groups, they alleged and got score below 3 point. While the 6 groups of all got 4 points in the aspect of participation, 3 groups got 3 points lower than because they only just asserted and not interact with other groups. Throughout the argumentation, two features were found that; as time goes by, arguments were refined; Students tended to use their prior to knowledge rather than evidence such as experimental data in making claims and conclusions.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제39권6호
• /
• pp.791-797
• /
• 2019

이 연구에서는 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 의한 통합과학과 과학탐구실험이 학생들의 과학에 대한 흥미, 과학적 태도, STS와 NOS에 대한 견해에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 수도권 소재의 고등학교에 재학 중인 1학년 학생 223명이 연구에 참여하였으며, 통합과학과 과학탐구실험의 이수 전후에 각각 검사를 실시하고 두 검사의 결과를 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 과학에 대한 흥미 점수와 과학적 태도 점수는 이수 전후에 유의미하게 향상되었다. STS에 대한 견해의 점수를 분석한 결과, 연구 윤리에 관한 항목의 견해는 이수 후에 유의미하게 향상되었으나 나머지 항목에서는 유의미한 차이가 없었다. NOS에 대한 견해의 점수는 모든 영역에서 이수 전후에 유의미한 차이가 없었다. 이에 대한 교육적 함의를 논의하였고, 후속 연구를 제안하였다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제3권3호
• /
• pp.184-190
• /
• 2010

This study is to verify the effects of classes at a finishing stage using cartoons depicting certain science textbook units on scientific attitudes and academic achievements of students, compared to those of classes using experiment and observation oriented textbooks. Participants of this study were 56 fifth graders at B Elementary School in Busan, and cartoon textbooks were developed based on 'Unit 1. Mirror & Lens' and 'Unit 3. Temperature & Wind' from a science textbook for the 1st semester, the year 5 to conduct cartoon led lessons just before ending a class till the 10th lesson, for the period of 4 weeks. The result of this study can be summarized as follows: Firstly, scientific attitudes improved better from the cartoon based lesson of a final stage than from the experiment and observation method, and especially more effective in lower groups among all other academic achievement levels as well as in male students. Secondly, academic achievements scored higher when cartoons were used in lessons than when the experiment and observation type was used, with higher groups of academic achievement levels working better, despite no significant gap existing between two genders. Thirdly, the memory transfer and sustenance of lessons were more effective in finishing class stage with cartoon studies than with experiment and observation one, and among all levels and both sexes, higher academic groups and male pupils exceeded. Fourthly, when questioned about their opinions on a cartoon led lesson for a final stage, 65% of those participants responded positively, while higher groups preferred more than lower groups. responded positively, while higher groups preferred more than lower groups.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.227-242
• /
• 2012

This research explores the scientific reasoning of pre-service elementary teachers in experimental design. The article focuses on pre-service teachers' responses to the questions in the worksheets which involve making their knowledge claims on extinguishing of a burning candle in a closed container, evaluating anomalous data, and designing experiment to test their ideas. Their responses are interpreted in terms of categories developed by Tytler and Peterson(2003, 2004). The interrelationship between conceptual knowledge and scientific reasoning is explored using the data. It is argued that coordination of ideas and evidence must be emphasized in the scientific investigations rather than fair test.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.197-203
• /
• 2012

The main purpose of this research is to search the effect of different types of advance organizers in elementary science classes, to the students in acquiring scientific concepts and its retentions. In order to proceed with the research, We have chosen 93 students of three different classes of fifth graders, studying in M elementary school in U metropolitan city. We have randomly chosen two classes as an experimental group and one class as a comparative group. In the first experimental group (Group1), advance organizer was put in a form of a sentence., and the second experimental group (Group2), advance organizer was put in a form of a picture. For the comparative group, We have not put any advance organizer, and the method of class was proceeded as it was before. The result of this research are as follows. Firstly, the result of 'One-way analysis of variance' on scientific concept grade, right after the experiment on three groups, has shown a meaningful difference that, the shape of advance organizer does affect the acquisition of elementary school students' scientific concept. Secondly, even though Group1, who was given with a sentence as an advance organizer, got higher scientific concept scores after the experiment than that of comparative group, However, there was not a meaningful difference between Group1 and comparative group. Thirdly, Group2, who was given with a picture as an advance organizer, has shown a meaningful difference from comparative group. Judging from the facts above, utilizing an advance organizer of a picture in elementary science class, will be very affective on students' acquiring scientific concept.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.198-209
• /
• 2011

이 연구에서는 실험 저널쓰기에서 나타난 예비 과학교사의 실험에 대한 반성적 사고를 조사하였다. 이를 위하여 탐구기반 물리실험 수업에서 예비 과학교사들에게 매 주제의 실험 수행마다 실험 과정과 수행에 대한 결과 및 논의와 더불어 실험 수행 후 실험에 대한 자신의 의견을 자유롭게 기술하는 실험 저널을 작성하도록 하고, 이들이 작성한 실험 저널에 포함된 진술문을 분석하여 실험에 대한 반성적 사고를 지식, 과정, 지향, 태도 등 4개의 차원으로 나누어 분석하였다. 지식 차원에는 반성적 사고는 실험을 통해 이미 알고 있는 내용을 점검하거나 실험 후에도 여전히 해결되지 않는 내용과 실험 후 새롭게 알게 된 내용에 대한 반추가 포함되었으며, 과정 차원에는 전반적인 실험 저널쓰기에서 나타난 예비과학교사들의 과학실험에 대한 반성적 사고 분석 207실험 과정에 대한 점검과 구체적인 실험 수행에 대한 반성이 드러났다. 지향 차원에서는 실험 수업을 통하여 얻게 된 과학의 본성에 대한 이해와 과학교육에 대한 견해가 포함되었으며, 태도 차원에서는 실험 수업에 대한 흥미와 동기, 실험수업에 대한 가치 인식이 포함되었다. 수행한 실험주제에 따라 반성적 사고의 유형별 빈도는 조금씩 다르게 나타났으나, 공통적으로 이러한 반성적 사고에는 예비 과학교사들의 자신의 앎과 학습과정에 대한 초인지, 과학과 과학교육에 대한 인식론적 신념, 과학과 실험에 대한 정의적 특성이 드러났다. 이와 같이 자신이 수행한 실험에 대해서 형식적인 절차에 따른 '과학적' 글쓰기뿐만 아니라 자유로운 형태로 '자신의' 글쓰기를 하게 하는 실험 저널쓰기는 과학학습 맥락에서 반성적 사고가 드러날 수 있는 매개이자 반성적 사고를 촉진할 수 있는 활동으로서 의미를 갖는다.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권5호
• /
• pp.351-392
• /
• 2007

Combat Development is process of studying and developing concept, doctrine, weapon systems, organization and training for the improvement of combat capability to be ready present and future warfare. The combat development domain consists of 6 fields Doctrine, Organization, Material, Training, Personnel, and Facilities. The cornerstones of combat development are "How to prepare" and "How to fight" in the future warfare. ROK- TRADOC(Republic of Korea Army Training and Doctrine Command) has implemented combat development that applies CBRS (Concept-Based Requirements System) and "Vision - Capstone concept - operating and functional concept - FOC(Future Operational Capabilities) Requirements". To prepare for the possibility or new types or wars in the future, the creation of new concept and system is essential. Though verification with various instruments, combat power can be secured and exhibited. Combat development by empirical mind estimation means that is no longer relevant.To prepare combat development based on scientific analysis, there is a need for powerful engineering analysis and verification, in order to prepare for uncertain and diverse future battlefield environments. In this thesis, warfighting experiment is essential ways and means to pursue the scientific combat development ; investigated tendency of combat development environment, and analyzed diversification aspects of possible future warfare. In conclusion, concept of campaign experiment and role is the conerstone of scientific combat development; and lays out the roadmap of all affecting components to its development.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.51-60
• /
• 1996

The purpose of this study is to develope and analyze a test for the assessment of physics inquiry experiment. To do this, three experiments about 'analysis of motion', 'the relation of force and acceleration', and 'free fall motion' in high school physics textbooks were chosen, and 5 scientific inquiry domains and 16 science process skills have been specified. For each experiments, test sheet of $29{\sim}44$ questions for assessing students' ability about physics inquiry experiment were developed on the basis of the scientific inquiry processes developed earlier. After instruction about 3 experiments mentioned above, a test was administered to the students who took experiment. After the adminstration of a test, the ratio of correct answers, discrimination index, and reliability were analyzed. Using the ratio of correct answers, we can determine item difficulty. Through the D.I(discrimination index), we can find which items can discriminate the students who took experiment well from those who took experiment badly, and we can also find the stability of a test result by the reliability analysis. The test developed in this study were also administered to the students who did not take experiments, and the results were compared with the those of the students who took experiments. With the comparison by chi-square method, we could find which items can discriminate the students who took experiments from those who did not take experiments.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.376-388
• /
• 2015

본 연구에서는 초등 과학 영재들을 위한 과학 탐구 능력 평가 문항을 개발하고 이를 초등 과학 영재들에게 적용하여 그 활용성에 대해 살펴보고자 하였다. 과학 탐구 능력 평가 문항은 실험 기반의 형태로 '식물의 구조와 기능' 단원의 식물 관다발 구조에 대한 것으로 관찰 및 추리, 실험 설계, 결론 도출 영역으로 구성되어 있다. 그리고 평가 문항의 채점 기준은 관찰 및 추리 영역의 경우 쌍떡잎식물과 외떡잎식물의 관다발 배열과 구조, 물관의 위치, 잉크에 식물을 담가 두는 이유 등의 요소를 가지고 상세화하였다. 실험 설계 영역의 경우 식물해부 방법, 실험 과정 구성 등을 요소로, 결론 도출영역의 경우는 실험 결과에 대한 예상, 예상과 결과에 대한 비교와 검증 등으로 상세화하였다. 이렇게 개발된 과학 탐구 능력 평가 문항을 대학부설 과학영재교육원에서 교육받고 있는 22명의 초등 과학영재들에게 적용하였다. 그 결과 과학영재들에게 활용 가능성이 매우 높은 것으로 나타났다.