• Title/Summary/Keyword: Science citation index

Search Result 228, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Analysis of KSCI(Korean Science Citation Index) of Domestic Journals in Mechanical Engineering (국내 기계관련 저널의 KSCI(Korean Science Citation Index) 분석)

  • Yoo, Wan-Suk
    • Proceedings of the KSME Conference
    • /
    • 2001.06b
    • /
    • pp.259-264
    • /
    • 2001
  • This paper presents impact factors of domestic journals in mechanical engineering area to present an objective data for journal evaluation. For this purpose, reference data of 47 Korean journals are databased and analyzed. From the developed database, impact factor, immediacy index and self citation index are calculated.

  • PDF

Development of a Korea SCI System for Efficient Citation Analysis (효율적인 인용분석을 위한 한국 SCI 시스템의 개발)

  • 이계준;조현양;최재황;윤희준
    • Journal of KIISE:Databases
    • /
    • v.31 no.2
    • /
    • pp.174-182
    • /
    • 2004
  • In order to produce information the author usually reference other authors' work. A citation index leads users to papers by citations. Citations lead the user to desired information. In this paper, KSCI(Korea Science Citation Index) which defines the relationships between citing documents and cited documents has been constructed. KSCI System is to solve problems for recursive retrieval in ISI's SCI(Science Citation Index) Path Encoding Indexing technique was used to solve the problems. From the analysis of data, this system has efficiency about 8.98% in the aspect of data storage. In the aspect of retrieval, there was efficiency between citing documents and cited documents, especially there was over 40% of efficiency in the retrieval of cited documents. It is concluded that suggested KSCI system will provide efficient storage and retrieval system.

A Study on the KSCI(Korean Science Citation Index) for Analyze the Impact Factor of Domestic Journals (국내학술지 영향력 지표 분석을 위한 한국과학기술인용색인(KSCI) 연구)

  • Choi Kwang-Nam
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.38 no.4
    • /
    • pp.271-289
    • /
    • 2004
  • In this study, we analyze out citing and cited references among researchers, using KSCI (Korean Science Citation Index) database that is developed by KISTI. we generate and analyze that impact factor and immediate index with same method in JCR's. KSCI's impact factor and immediate index compared to JCR's, and with this basis, this study propose the need of development KSCI database and present new service model for evaluate of domestic journals.

A Study on Developing and Refining a Large Citation Service System

  • Kim, Kwang-Young;Kim, Hwan-Min
    • International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
    • /
    • v.3 no.1
    • /
    • pp.65-80
    • /
    • 2013
  • Today, citation index information is used as an outcome scale of spreading technology and encouraging research. Article citation information is an important factor to determine the authority of the relevant author. Google Scholar uses the article citation information to organize academic article search results with a rank algorithm. For an accurate analysis of such important citation index information, large amounts of bibliographic data are required. Therefore, this study aims to build a fast and efficient system for large amounts of bibliographic data, and to design and develop a system for quickly analyzing cited information for that data. This study also aims to use and analyze citation data to be a basic element for providing various advanced services to the academic article search system.

A Study on Usability and Service Direction of Korean Science Citation Index (한국과학기술인용색인의 효용성 및 서비스 방향에 관한 연구)

  • 최광남;조현양;안세필
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.19 no.4
    • /
    • pp.77-94
    • /
    • 2002
  • In this study we analyze the present situation of cited and citing references among researchers, based on Korean Science Citation Index developed by Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information. There are some differences on the rank of frequently cited journals between JCR of ISI and KSCI, especially in the field of mechanical engineering. The purpose of this study is to find an efficient way of constructing KSCI database and to propose a service model which can be available as a tool to evaluate research activities and to provide researcher with basic information resources.

Study about Research Data Citation Based on DCI (Data Citation Index) (Data Citation Index를 기반으로 한 연구데이터 인용에 관한 연구)

  • Cho, Jane
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.50 no.1
    • /
    • pp.189-207
    • /
    • 2016
  • Sharing and reutilizing of research data could not only enhance efficiency and transparency of research process, but also create new science through data integrating and reinterpretationing. Diverse policies about research data sharing and reutilizing have been developing, along with extending of research evaluating spectrum that across research data citation rate to social impact of research output. This study analyzed the scale and citation number of research data which has not been analyzed before in korea through data citation index using Kruskal-Wallis H analysis. As result, genetics and biotechnology are identified as subject areas which have most huge number of research data, however the subject areas that have been highly cited are identified as economics and social study such as, demographic and employment. And Uk Data Archive, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research are analyzed as data repositories which have most highly cited research data. And the data study which describes methodology of data survey, type and so on shows high citation rate than other data type. In the result of altmetrics of research data, data study of social science shows relatively high impact than other areas.

Contribution of Journals to Academic Disciplines

  • Lee, Hye-Young
    • Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
    • /
    • v.3 no.1
    • /
    • pp.66-76
    • /
    • 2015
  • This research uses a new approach to analyze the extent of influence journal papers have on the progress of varied research fields by estimation of subject-based influence on research other than impact factor that relies on citation index. It is initiated with the hypothesis that earlier established citation relations between journal and citing paper, which reveals the research field that contains the highest citation index and hence has received the greatest contribution from a particular journal, would have inconsistent contribution to the research field over the year of journal publication. The target research is primarily 128 journal papers and 4,123 citing papers from Information Systems Research published in the years 2001, 2004, 2007, and 2010. The characteristics of citation history and hallmarks of research field of citing papers were studied and analysis on significant distinction between citing fields based on the year of publication was performed. The analysis results show the order of citation rate to be highest from Computer Science (2,221 cases), Business & Economics (2,191 cases), and Information Science & Library Science (1,901 cases). The citation history of the journal, nonetheless, indicates increase in citation during 2-3 years after the earliest publication till it achieves constant citation. The statistical analysis shows significant variation in citing fields in accordance with the publication year; especially in 2010, journal contribution has increased in the fields of Business & Economics, Operations Research & Management Science, and Health Care Sciences & Services but, however, is reduced in Education & Educational Research and Social Sciences - Other Topics.

Journal Citation Analysis for Library Services on Interdisciplinary Domains: A Case Study of Department of Biotechnology, Y University (학제적 분야의 정보서비스를 위한 학술지 인용 분석에 관한 연구: Y대학교 생명공학과를 중심으로)

  • Yu, So-Young;Lee, Jae-Yun
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.283-308
    • /
    • 2008
  • In this study, we testify that network structural attributes of a citation network can explain other aspects of journal citation behaviors and the importances of journals. And we also testify various citation impact indicators of journals including JIF and h-index to verify the difference among them especially focused on their ability to explain an institution's local features of citation behaviors. An institutional citation network is derived using the articles published in 2006-2007 by biotechnology faculties of Y University. And various journal citation impact indicators including JIF, SJR, h-index, EigenFactor, JII are gathered from different service sites such as Web of Science, SCImago, EigenFactor.com, Journal-Ranking.com. As a results, we can explain the institution's 5 research domains with inter-citation network. And we find that the co-citation network structural features can show explanations on the patterns of institutional journal citation behavior different from the simple cited frequency of the institution or patterns based on general citation indicators. Also We find that journal ranks with various citation indicators have differences and it implies that total-based indices, average-based indices, and hybrid index(h-index) explain different aspects of journal citation pattern. We also reveal that the coverage of citation DB doesn't be a matter in the journal ranking. Analyzing the citation networks derived from an institution's research outputs can be a useful and effective method in developing several library services.

Korea Citation Index and Its Macro Bibliometrics

  • Kim, Sohyeong;Choi, Taejin;Yoon, Aeran;Seol, Sung-Soo
    • Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
    • /
    • v.2 no.2
    • /
    • pp.194-211
    • /
    • 2013
  • This paper introduces the Korea Citation Index (KCI) and also some macro statistics of KCI. KCI started service since 2008 by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), but the data has been gathered from 1998. Our findings are as follows: heavy reliance on books in humanities, but papers as the main reference in all other disciplines. Impact factor is an increasing trend in all disciplines. Social science has the highest impact factor among all fields. In some fields even in science and engineering areas, there are more KCI papers than Korean JCR papers and impact factors of the KCI are higher than JCR. As for the distinction between nationally and internationally fields or journals, some disciplines in social science are clearly nationally oriented. NSE journals listed in both KCI and JCR, however, are not clear in terms of impact factor, but clear in terms of the numbers of papers.

Co-authorship Credit Allocation Methods in the Assessment of Citation Impact of Chemistry Faculty

  • Lee, Jongwook;Yang, Kiduk
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.49 no.3
    • /
    • pp.273-289
    • /
    • 2015
  • This study examined changes in citation index scores and rankings of thirty-five chemistry faculty members at Seoul National University using different co-authorship credit allocation models. Using 1,436 Web of Science papers published between 2007 and 2013, we applied the inflated, fractional, harmonic, network-based allocation, and harmonic+ models to calculate faculty's h-, R-, and normalization of h- and R- index scores and rankings. The harmonic+ model, which is based on our belief that contribution of primary authors should be the same regardless of collaboration, is designed to minimize the penalty for research collaboration imposed by harmonic and NBA models by boosting the contribution of collaborating primary authors to be on the equal footing with single authors. Although citation rankings by different models are correlated with each other within the same type of citation indicator, rankings of many faculty members changed across models, suggesting the importance of an accurate and relevant authorship credit allocation model in the citation assessment of researchers. The study also found that authorship patterns in conjunction with citation counts are important factors for robust authorship models such as harmonic and NBA, and harmonic+ model may be beneficial for collaborating primary authors. Future research that reexamines the models with updated empirical data would provide further insights into the robustness of the models.