• 생약학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.119-124
• /
• 1981

In our country, in order to cure diseases, a large number of crude drug preparations has been available. Nevertheless, the development of crude drug preparations have been inhibited, because the quality control is not completed so far. Therefore, we have eontinued on studing the quality control method by Zig-zag TLC. profile analysis. The water extract of 'Samyo-Tang' and componental crude drug (Glycyrrhizae Radix, Ephedrae Herba, Armenicae Semen) were developed on Silica gel $60F_{254}\;plate\;(E.\;Merck)$ useing elution solvent. The developed plate were examined useing Dual Wavelength Zig-zag Scanner (Shimadzu). According to the results of the experiment, it could be summarized as follow: 1) Original patterns of TLC profiles of 'Samyo-Tang' componental crude drug and mixing two crude drugs of 'Samyo-Tang' were observed. 2) Original patterns TLC profile of each extract after spraying with 2% ninhydrine were observed. 3) In the extract of addition and subtraction of Ephedrae Herba, peak area of Rf 0.48 and Rf 0.60 were varied quantitatively.

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.196-221
• /
• 2011

조선시대 종묘(宗廟)에 모실 수 없는 왕의 사친, 등극하지 못한 세자와 같은 왕족의 신위를 모신 공간, 사묘(私廟)는 왕명에 의해 건립되고 관리되었다. 또한 사묘의 영건은 각 의궤(儀軌)에 담겼고 이와 함께 왕실사묘의 평면배치도 등이 남겨졌다. 정조의 후궁으로 순조(純祖)를 생산한 수빈박씨(綬嬪朴氏)의 신위를 모신 경우궁의 영건기록인 1824년 "현사궁별묘영건도감의궤(顯思宮別廟營建都監儀軌)"가 현존하기에 그간 소개된 바도 없고 연대조차도 알 수 없었던 <경우궁도(景祐宮圖)>의 제작 연대, 사용재료 및 장황(粧潢) 등을 살펴볼 수 있다. 즉 <경우궁도>는 1822년에 타계한 수빈박씨의 신위를 모시기 위해 궁내에 설치했던 혼전(魂殿)을 폐하고 궁밖에 별도로 마련한 터에 왕명에 의해 1824년 현사궁별묘를 영건하면서 영건도감(營建都監)에서 제작한 <현사궁별묘전도>인 것으로 확인된다. 영건도감에서 <경우궁도>의 제작이 이루어졌을 것이기에 의궤에 제시된 화원(畵員)들이 주목되지만 이들의 현존작이 없어 화풍을 비교할 수 없음은 아쉬움으로 남는다. 하지만 <경우궁도>는 <동궐도(東闕圖)>에서 볼 수 있는 완벽한 평행사선구도로 일목요연하게 많은 전각 등을 묘사하고 있는 점이 가장 큰 양식적 특징으로 지적할 수 있다. 주지하듯 건축물을 다룬 그림들은 해당 건축그림 제작 의도에 맞게 시점을 택해 그리거나 아니면 다시점을 이용해 그리게 된다. 우리 회화에서 건축물을 다룬 그림은 일찍부터 평행사선구도, 정면부감시 또는 다시점 등을 적절히 활용하여 제작되었다. 18세기에 이르면 평행사선구도로 정확하게 그리면서도 회화성도 높은 작품들이 등장하기 시작하는데 19세기 전반기에 이와 같은 현상이 최고로 발전한 듯 <동궐도>가 등장한다. <경우궁도> 또한 완성된 평행사선구도로 200칸 가까운 많은 전각들을 한눈에 알아볼 수 있도록 치밀하게 표현하고 있어 <동궐도>와 같은 계열에 속하는 건축그림으로 볼 수 있다. 이는 또한 수지법, 옥우법, 지면의 표면질감 표현 등 구체적 화법의 비교를 통해 알 수 있다. 다만 사당공간 중 가장 중요한 정당권역만은 의궤도설 '정당이하제처(正堂以下諸處)'라는 평면배치도와 그대로 일치하여 평행사선구도를 버리고 정면부감시 및 사방전도식묘법으로 표현된 점은 <경우궁도>만이 갖는 특징으로 지적될 수 있다. 동시대 영건과 관계된 그림은 아닌 개인의 거주지를 표현한 그림에 이와 같이 시점을 각각 달리하여 표현한 예가 있기도 하여 사당공간을 그린 그림만이 가지는 특성인지는 아직 정확히 알 수 없다. 한편 왼편 하단으로 향하는 평행사선구도를 택해 그릴 경우 화면 왼편 상단과 오른편 하단은 비게 된다. 경우궁도가 이에 부합되는 화면을 보여주는데 반해 동궐도는 다양한 나무 등을 채워 빈 여백 없는 완벽한 화면 구성을 보여준다. 이와 같은 현상은 두 작품의 장황의 현황과도 일치하는데 지본 낱장으로 완성된 경우궁도는 화첩으로 표제까지 달아 완성된 동궐도와는 완성도의 면에서 차이가 있다고 판단된다. 이는 마치 동궐도가 그 묘사의 사실성, 기록성을 넘어 감상의 목적까지도 고려하여 작품제작 및 장황까지 마친 것이었다면 경우궁도는 영건의 상황을 있는 그대로 화면에 옮겨 그리는 기록이 가장 중요한 목적으로 제작되었음을 알게 해주는 것이다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.61-80
• /
• 2011

This study estimated the prototype of Yangjindang at the time of its foundation by putting together the literature and discovered data and historical research on family related to Sangju Yangjindang, and looked at its architectural characteristics. These are summarized as follows: First, Yangjindang is an office building which was completed in three years [1629] after its start of construction when Keomgan Jojeong was at the age of 72 [1626] in his latter days and it was used for performing ancestral rites for Jojeong's forefathers of the head family of Pungyang Jo by family origin. Yangjindang was founded as a base of utopia for putting ancestral rites & commemoration, harmoniousness of a tribe, and educational idea into practice together with Ojakdang. Such a movement can be judged to interpret and apply the circumstances of the times realistically and flexibly where they tried to pursue the promotion of Confucianism & studies of the proprieties as well as the consciousness of practice, and to bring a tribe into harmony after the war through the retirement of Toegye School. Second, it is located at a topographically ideal spot on the edge of the Jangcheon-a tributary of Nakdong with a good physiology and landscape and its location was also the lot for a house of Jojeong's ancestor, which was burned down by war. Behind such a location and planning of Yangjindang, it is presumed, though not certain that it was modelled after Naeap village at Andong- Jojeong's parents-in-low's home. Third, as for its foundation size, it's a head house as much as about more than 100-kan, and its structure is composed of Samyo, Bonche, and Yangjindang. In addition, arrangements of buildings and its composition system and renovation procedures followed Chu-tzu Garyoe. Composition of Samyo can be restored to Yangjindang, Jugo, Woesammun, and Samyo; however, there has been no case of existence in case of Jugo building composition & arrangement takes on an aspect of a compromise between Gamyojido and Sandangjido of Garoe, which seems to be the result from flexibly interpreting and applying the rituals and studies of the proprieties of Toegye School in keeping with locational topography and realistic circumstances while making it a principle for them to observe by Toegye School. There exists a difference between Bonche and its counterpart of the upper class housing at Sangju district in that Bonche[main building] is a squre-shaped 'Ttuljip' typical of Andong setting a family ancestral ritual as a main function. Fourth, there existed a lot of hardships in raising money to cover repairs in time of doing repairs to this structure after 180 years since its establishment. In case of the repair work on Bonche, the level of renovation was limited to the replacement of old materials for rafters, doorpost, roof members and railings with new materials, together with partial alterations in case of window system. It is estimated that Yangjindang was renovated in 1808, and afterwards it was renamed Okryujeong after being re-built at another site. Through the repairs, the floor was expanded for the clan's meeting, and angle rafters and roof members were mended as well. Especially, the plane and structure of Okryujeong which was re-built at another site are expected to give clues to its restoration due to the resemblance to original appearance of Yangjindang at the time of its renovation in 1808.

• 대한한의학방제학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.169-192
• /
• 2005

This report describes the remedial fields, symptoms, pathlogy, dosage, prescriptional constitution of 79 studies to the use of Herba Ephedrae main blended prescriptions from dongeubogam. The following conclusions were reached through investigations on the prescriptions that use Herba Ephedrae as a key ingredient Herba Ephedrae blended prescriptions are utilized for 26 therapeutic purposes, for example, in symptoms of cough, cold, wind. In particular, 20.2% of the prescriptions appear in the chapter of cough. Prescriptions that utilize Herba Ephearae as the main ingredient are used in the treatment of 47 different types of diseases, for example, in the treatment of wind-cold pathogen, cold, wind, exogenous febrile disease etc. Herba Ephedrae is most widely used in six pathogenic factors such as wind, cold, dampness, heat. The actual amount of Herba Ephedrae blended has ranged at a wide variety of amounts from 1 don to 2 don. It is widely applied with base prescriptions such as Mahwang-tang, Samyo-tang, Mahwangbujasesin-tang, Mahwangkanghwal-tang.

• 혜화의학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.595-646
• /
• 2000

I. Introduction Bi(痺) means blocking. BiJeung is one kind of symptoms making muscles, bones and jonts feel pain, numbness or edema. For example it can be gout or SLE etc. says that Bi is combination of PungHanSeup. And many doctors said that BiJeung is caused by food, fatigue, sex, stress and change of weather. Therefore we must treat BiJeung by character of patients and characteristic of the disease. Many famous doctors studied medical science by their fathers or teachers. So the history of medical science is long. So I studied ${\ll}Bijeungjujip{\gg}$. II. Final Decision 1. JoGeumTak(趙金鐸) devided BiJeung into Pung, Han, Seup and EumHeo, HeulHeo, YangHeo, GanSinHeo by charcter or reaction of pain. And he use DaeJinGyoTang, GyegiGakYakJiMoTang, SamyoSan, etc. 2. JangPaeGyeu(張沛圭) focused on division of HanYeol(寒熱; coldness and heat) in spite of complexity of BiJeung. He also used insects for treatment. They are very useful for treatment of BiJeung because they can remove EoHyeol(瘀血). 3. SeolMaeng(薛盟) said that the actual cause of BiJeung is Seup. So he thought that BiJeung can be divided into PungSeup, SeupYeol, HanSeup. And he established 6 rules to treat BiJeung and he studied herbs. 4. JangGi(張琪) introduced 10 prescriptions and 10 rules to cure BiJeung. The 1st prescription is for OyeSa, 2nd for internal Yeol, 3rd for old BiJeung, 4th for Soothing muscles, 5th for HanSeup, 6th for regular BiJeung, 7th for functional disorder, 8th for YeolBi, 9th for joint pain and 10th for pain of lower limb. 5. GangSeYoung(江世英) used PungYeongTang(風靈湯) for the treatment of PungBi, OGyeHeukHoTang(烏桂黑虎湯) for HanBi, BangGiMokGwaTang(防己木瓜湯) for SeupBi, YeolBiTang(熱痺湯) for YeolBi, WoDaeRyeokTang(牛大力湯) for GiHei, HyeolPungGeunTang(血楓根湯) for HyeolHeo, ToJiRyongTang(土地龍湯) for the acute stage of SeupBi, OJoRyongTang(五爪龍湯) for the chronic stage of SeupBi, and so on. 6. ShiGeumMook(施今墨) devided BiJeung into four types. They are PungSeupYeol, PungHanSeup, GiHyeolSil(氣血實) and GiHyeolHeo(氣血虛). And he introduced the eight rules of the treatment(SanPun(散風), ChukHan(逐寒), GeoSeuP(, CheongYeol(淸熱), TongRak(通絡), HwalHyeol(活血), HaengGi(行氣), BoHeo(補虛)). 7. WangYiYou(王李儒) explained the acute athritis and said that it can be applicable to HaneBi(行痺). And he used GyeJiJakYakJiMoTang(桂枝芍蘂知母湯) for HanBi and YeolBiJinTongTang(熱痺鎭痛湯) for YeolBi. 8. JangJinYeo(章眞如) said that YeolBi is more common than HanBi. The sympthoms of YeolBi are severe pain, fever, dried tongue, insomnia, etc. And he devided YeolBi into SilYeol and HeoYeol. In case of SilYeol, he used GyeoJiTangHapBaekHoTang(桂枝湯合白虎湯) and in case of HeoYeol he used JaEumYangAekTang(滋陰養液湯). 9. SaHaeJu(謝海洲) introduced three important rules of treatment and four appropriate rules of treatment of BiJeung. 10. YouDoJu(劉渡舟) said that YeolBi is more common than HanBi. He used GaGamMokBanGiTang(加減木防已湯) for YeolBi, GyeJiJakYakJiMoTang or GyeJiBuJaTang(桂枝附子湯) for HanBi and WooHwangHwan(牛黃丸) for the joint pain. 11. GangYiSon(江爾遜) focused on the internal cause. The most important internal cause is JeongGiHeo(正氣虛). So he tried to treat BiJeung by means of balance of Gi and Hyeol. So he ususlly used ODuTang(烏頭湯) and SamHwangTang(三黃湯) for YeolBi, OJeokSan(五積散) for HanBi, SamBiTang(三痺湯) for the chronic BiJeung. 12. HoGeonHwa(胡建華) said that to distinguish YeolBi from Hanbi is very difficult. So he used GyeJiJakYakJiMoTang in case of mixture of HanBi and YeoBi. 13. PiBokGo(畢福高) said that the most common BiJeung is HanBi. He usually used acupuncture with medicine. He followed the theory of EumYongHwa(嚴用和)-he focused on SeonBoHuSa(先補後瀉). 14. ChoiMunBin(崔文彬) used GeoPungHwalHyeolTang(祛風活血湯) for HanBi, SanHanTongRakTang(散寒通絡湯) for TongBi(痛痺), LiSeupHwaRakTang(利濕和絡湯) for ChakBi(着痺), CheongYeolTongGyeolChukBiTang(淸熱通經逐痺湯) for YeolBi(熱痺) and GeoPungHwalHyeolTang(祛風活血湯) for PiBi(皮痺). 15. YouleokSeon(劉赤選) introduced the common principle for the treatment of BiJeung. He used HaePuneDeungTang(海風藤湯) for HaengBi(行痺), SinChakTang(腎着湯), DokHwalGiSaengTang(獨活寄生湯) for TongBi(痛痺), TongPungBang(痛風方) for ChakBi(着痺) and SangGiYiMiTangGaYeongYangGakTang(桑枝苡米湯加羚羊角骨) for YeolBi(熱痺). 16. LimHakHwa(林鶴和) said about TanTan(movement disorders or numbness) and devided TanTan into the acute stage and the chronic stage. He used acupuncture at the meridian spot like YeolGyeol(列缺), HapGok(合谷), etc. And he also used MaHwangBuJaSeSinTang(麻黃附子細辛湯) in case of the acute stage. In the chronic stage he used BangPungTang(防風湯). 17. JinBaekGeun(陳伯勤) liked to use three rules(HwaHyeol(活血), ChiDam(治痰), BoSin(補腎)) to treat BiJeung. He used JinTongSan(鎭痛散) for the purpose of HwalHyeol(活血), SoHwalRakDan(小活絡丹) for ChiDam(治痰) and DokHwalGiSaengTang(獨活寄生湯) for BoSin(補腎). 18. YimGyeHak(任繼學) focused on YangHyeolJoGi(養血調氣) if the stage of BiJeung is chronic. And in the chronic stage he insisted on not using GalHwal(羌活), DokHwal(獨活) and BangPung(防風).