• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제19권11호
• /
• pp.411-420
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 종합병원 의료인의 교육훈련 인식이 의료인 상호간 커뮤니케이션에 미치는 영향을 파악하기 위한 목적으로 수행된 연구이다. 자료조사는 광주광역시, 전라남도 소재 29개 종합병원에서 근무하는 의료인 433명을 대상으로 2018년 6월 8일부터 2018년 6월 25일까지 자료를 수집하였다. 자료 분석은 t-검정과 분산분석, 사후검정, 상관관계 및 단계적 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과 인구사회학적 특성 및 건강관련 특성과 의료인 상호간 커뮤니케이션 차이를 검정한 결과 연령, 학력, 병상규모, 직업만족도, 소재지, 건강상태, 건강관리 교육경험, 우울경험에서, 교육훈련 인식은 연령, 병상규모, 직종, 급여수준, 의료기관 종류, 직업만족도, 소재지, 건강상태, 건강관리 교육경험, 만성질환 여부에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 의료인 상호간의 커뮤니케이션에 미치는 영향 요인으로 학력, 건강관련 교육경험에서 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤고, 연령과 병상규모(801병상 이상), 직업만족도에서는 연령이 높을수록, 병상규모가 801병상 이상인 경우, 직업에 만족하지 못할수록 부정적인 영향을 미쳤으며, 교육훈련 하부요인인 지원환경, 학습전이, 성과에서 영향을 미쳤다. 이러한 연구를 바탕으로 교육훈련 계획수립 시 성과와 지원환경, 학습전이를 높일 수 있는 교육훈련 프로그램 구축이 필요하며, 의학 및 간호학생들의 교육 과정에 커뮤니케이션의 정규 교육과정을 도입. 의료인 상호간 커뮤니케이션을 높여 환자에게 안전한 의료서비스를 제공해야 할 것이다.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.19-35
• /
• 2024

Background: This study investigated a safe and effective bolus dose and lockout time for patient-controlled sedation (PCS) with dexmedetomidine for dental treatments. The depth of sedation, vital signs, and patient satisfaction were investigated to demonstrate safety. Methods: Thirty patients requiring dental scaling were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups based on bolus doses and lockout times: group 1 (low dose group, bolus dose 0.05 ㎍/kg, 1-minute lockout time), group 2 (middle dose group, 0.1 ㎍/kg, 1-minute), and group 3 (high dose group, 0.2 ㎍/kg, 3-minute) (n = 10 each). ECG, pulse, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, end-tidal CO₂, respiratory rate, and bispectral index scores (BIS) were measured and recorded. The study was conducted in two stages: the first involved sedation without dental treatment and the second included sedation with dental scaling. Patients were instructed to press the drug demand button every 10 s, and the process of falling asleep and waking up was repeated 1-5 times. In the second stage, during dental scaling, patients were instructed to press the drug demand button. Loss of responsiveness (LOR) was defined as failure to respond to auditory stimuli six times, determining sleep onset. Patient and dentist satisfaction were assessed before and after experimentation. Results: Thirty patients (22 males) participated in the study. Scaling was performed in 29 patients after excluding one who experienced dizziness during the first stage. The average number of drug administrations until first LOR was significantly lower in group 3 (2.8 times) than groups 1 and 2 (8.0 and 6.5 times, respectively). The time taken to reach the LOR showed no difference between groups. During the second stage, the average time required to reach the LOR during scaling was 583.4 seconds. The effect site concentrations (Ce) was significantly lower in group 1 than groups 2 and 3. In the participant survey on PCS, 8/10 in group 3 reported partial memory loss, whereas 17/20 in groups 1 and 2 recalled the procedure fully or partially. Conclusion: PCS with dexmedetomidine can provide a rapid onset of sedation, safe vital sign management, and minimal side effects, thus facilitating smooth dental sedation.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제5권
• /
• pp.101-118
• /
• 1993

Generally there is no law and liability system which applies particulary to commercial space ventures. There are several international treaties and national statutes which deal with space ventures, but their impact on the liability of commercial space ventures has not been significant. Every state law in the United States will impose both tort and contract liability on those responsible for injuries or losses caused by defective products or by services performed negligently. As with the providers of other products and services, those who participate in commercial space ventures have exposure to liability in both tort and contract which is limited to the extent of the resulting damage The manufacturer of a small and cheap component which caused a satellite to fail to reach orbit or to operate nominally has the same exposure to liability as the provider of launch vehicle or the manufacturer of satellite into which the component was incorporaded. Considering the enormity of losses which may result from launch failure or satellite failure, those participated in commercial space ventures will do their best to limit their exposure to liability by contract to the extent permitted by law. In most states of the United States, contracts which limit or disclaim the liability are enforceable with respect to claims for losses or damage to property if they are drafted in compliance with the requirements of the applicable law. In California an attempt to disclaim the liability for one's own negligence will be enforceable only if the contract states explicitly that the parties intend to have the disclaimer apply to negligence claims. Most state laws of the United States will refuse to enforce contracts which attempt to disclaim the liability for gross negligence on public policy grounds. However, the public policy which favoured disclaiming the liability as to gross negligence for providers of launch services was pronounced by the United States Congress in the 1988 Amendments to the 1984 Commercial Space Launch Act. To extend the disclaimer of liability to remote purchasers, the contract of resale should state expressly that the disclaimer applies for the benefit of all contractors and subcontractors who participated in producing the product. This situation may occur when the purchaser of a satellite which has failed to reach orbit has not contracted directly with the provider of launch services. Contracts for launch services usually contain cross-waiver of liability clauses by which each participant in the launch agrees to be responsible for it's own loss and to waive any claims which it may have against other participants. The crosswaiver of liability clause may apply to the participants in the launch who are parties to the launch services agreement, but not apply to their subcontractors. The role of insurance in responding to many risks has been critical in assisting commercial space ventures grow. Today traditional property and liability insurance, such as pre-launch, launch and in-orbit insurance and third party liability insurance, have become mandatory parts of most space projects. The manufacture and pre-launch insurance covers direct physical loss or damage to the satellite, its apogee kick moter and including its related launch equipment from commencement of loading operations at the manufacture's plant until lift off. The launch and early orbit insurance covers the satellite for physical loss or damage from attachment of risk through to commissioning and for some period of initial operation between 180 days and 12 months after launch. The in-orbit insurance covers physical loss of or damage to the satellite occuring during or caused by an event during the policy period. The third party liability insurance covers the satellite owner' s liability exposure at the launch site and liability arising out of the launch and operation in orbit. In conclusion, the liability in commercial space ventures extends to any organization which participates in providing products and services used in the venture. Accordingly, it is essential for any organization participating in commercial space ventures to contractually disclaim its liability to the extent permitted by law. To achieve the effective disclaimers, it is necessary to determine the applicable law and to understand the requirements of the law which will govern the terms of the contract. A great deal of funds have been used in R&D for commercial space ventures to increase reliability, safety and success. However, the historical reliability of launches and success for commercial space ventures have proved to be slightly lower than we would have wished for. Space insurance has played an important role in reducing the high risks present in commercial space ventures.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제29호
• /
• pp.193-222
• /
• 2011

우리나라는 2010년 11월, 서울에서 'G20 정상회의'를 큰 문제없이 성공적으로 개최한 바 있으나 그 후 북한은 연평도 포격사건을 일으킨 바 있으며, 북핵문제로 갈등을 겪으면서 남북 간 경색국면이 가중되고 있는 시점에서 국제회의 행사의 하나인 '핵 안보정상회의'를 개최하게 되므로 개최의미가 매우 크다. '핵 안보정상회의'의 참가국은 47개국으로 우리나라에서 개최한 ASEM, APEC, G20 정상회의 참가국 수 보다 많으며, 핵 관련 3개 국제기구인 UN, IAEA, EU도 초청하는 대규모 국제회의 행사이다. 따라서 성공적인 '핵 안보정상회의'의 개최는 우리나라의 국격을 한 단계 높이는 계기가 될 것이며, 북핵문제 해결에도 도움이 될 개연성이 있는 중요한 국제행사인 것이다. 반면에, 외국에서 개최한 국제 정상회의와 마찬가지로 내년 4월에 개최 예정인 '핵 안보정상회의'에서도 폭력적인 반(反)세계화 시위가 있을 것에 대비해야 한다. 본 연구는 1999년부터 2009년까지 10년간 외국에서 개최된 다자간 국제회의 시 집회시위 사례분석을 통하여 문제점을 도출하여 이를 토대로 내년 4월, 개최예정인 '핵 안보정상회의' 시 집회시위에 관한 안전관리 방안을 모색해 보는데 연구의 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서 제시한 안전관리 방안으로는 첫째, 행사관련 정 첩보 수집 및 검문검색 강화, 둘째, 국내 NGO에 대한 선무활동 강화 및 법적장치의 보완, 셋째, 대국민 홍보활동의 강화, 넷째, 진압요원의 조기차출로 교육훈련 및 비상대책 강화 등이다. '핵 안보정상회의시' 비상대책의 수단으로 군사지원대책을 보다 적극적으로 추진해야 하며, 행사에 임박하여서는 국방부와 협조하여 전 후방 군사대비태세를 보다 강화하고, 화생방테러에 대비하여 화생방 탐지 및 제독업무도 지원해야 한다.