• 대한환경공학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.329-336
• /
• 2006

제철부산물은 슬래그, 슬러지 및 분진 등의 다양한 부산물을 함유하며 이중 제강분진은 중금속 함량이 높아 지정폐기물로 버려지고 있다. 그러나 제강분진의 경우 Fe(0), Fe(II) 함량이 60% 이상으로 이의 활용에 대한 많은 연구가 있어왔다. 이중 최근에 제안되는 것이 제강분진을 이용한 독성 물질 함유 침출수의 처리이다. 이는 투수성 반응벽을 매립장 바닥차수재에 적용한 개념으로 침출수와 제강분진을 반응시켜 침출수의 TCE, PCE, 다이옥신 및 $Cr^{6+}$ 등의 독성물질을 환원, 무독화 시키고자 하는 것이다. 이를 위해 제강분진의 원소용출 특성규명이 선결되어야 하며 특히 제강분진의 장기적이고 다양한 환경에서의 용출특성을 알아보고자 다양한 용출방법을 택하였다. 즉, 가용용출시험, pH 고정 시험 및 연속주상시험 등을 이용하여 제강분진의 중금속 용출특성을 밝히고자 하였다. 중금속 항목 중 Cr과 Zn가 특정 pH 환경에서 우려수준 이상으로 용출되었으나 다른 원소들의 경우 위해성을 나타내는 농도 이하로 용출된다. 이중 Zn의 경우 제강분진 침출수의 pH가 12내외인 점을 고려할 경우 용출 가능성은 매우 낮을 것으로 판단된다. 그러나 Cr의 경우 반대로 알칼리 환경에서 더 용출된다. 따라서 제강분진 재활용에 앞서 Cr 용출을 제어할 수 있는 방법이 선행되어야 할 것이다. 주상시험에서 Cr 농도는 시간이 경과하면서 빠르게 감소하는 것이 관찰되었으며 이는 입자표면에 주로 분포한 Cr이 용출되거나 환원철과 반응하여 $Cr(OH)_3$ 등으로 공침, 제거되는 두 가지 가능성을 시사한다. Cr과 다른 중금속들의 용출제어 방법의 선행이 가능하다는 전제에서 중금속 농도가 매우 높은 폐수나 침출수에 제강분진을 제한적으로 적용이 가능하다고 판단된다.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.173-189
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of specific head positions on the mandibular rotational torque movements in maximum mouth opening, protrusion and lateral excursion. Thirty dental students without any sign or symptom of temporomandibular disorders(TMDs) were included as a control group and 90 patients with TMDs were selected and examined by routine diagnostic procedure for TMDs including radiographs and were classified into 3 subgroups : disc displacement with reduction, disc displacement without reduction, and degenerative joint disease. Mandibular rotational torque movements were observed in four head postures: upright head posture(NHP), upward head posture(UHP), downward head posture(DHP), and forward head posture(FHP). For UHP, the head was inclined 30 degrees upward: for DHP, the head was inclined 30 degrees downward: for FHP, the head was positioned 4cm forward. These positions were adjusted with the use of cervical range-of-motion instrumentation(CROM, Performance Attainment Inc., St. Paul, U.S.A.). Mandibular rotational torque movements were monitored with the Rotate program of BioPAK system (Bioresearch Inc., WI, U.S.A.). The rotational torque movements in frontal and horizontal plane during mandibular border movement were recorded with two parameters: frontal rotational torque angle and horizontal rotational torque angle. The data obtained was analyzed by the SAS/Stat program. The obtained results were as follows : 1. The control group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles in UHP than those in DHP and FHP during maximum mouth opening in both frontal and horizontal planes. Disc displacement with reduction group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles in DHP and FHP than those in NHP during lateral excursion to the affected and non-affected sides in both frontal and horizontal planes(p<0.05). 2. Disc displacement without reduction group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles in FHP than those in any other head postures during maximum mouth opening as well as lateral excursion to the affected and non-affected sides in both frontal and horizontal planes. Degenerative joint disease group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles in FHP than those in any other head postures during maximum mouth opening, protrusion and lateral excursion in both frontal and horizontal planes(p<0.05). 3. In NHP, mandibular rotational angle of the control group was significantly larger than that of any other patient subgroups. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement with reduction group was significantly larger than that of disc displacement without reduction group during maximum mouth opening in the frontal plane. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement without reduction group was significantly larger than that of disc displacement with reduction group or degenerative joint disease group during maximum mouth opening in the horizontal plane(p<0.05). 4. In NHP, mandibular rotational angles of disc displacement without reduction group were significantly larger than those of the control group or disc displacement with reduction group during lateral excursion to the affected side in both frontal and horizontal planes. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement without reduction group was significantly smaller than that of the control group during lateral excursion to the non-affected side in frontal plane. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement without reduction group was significantly larger than that of disc displacement with reduction group during lateral excursion to the non-affected side in the horizontal plane(p<0.05). 5. In NHP, mandibular rotational angle of the control group was significantly smaller than that of disc displacement with reduction group or disc displacement without reduction group during protrusion in the frontal plane. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement without reduction group was significantly larger than that of the disc displacement with reduction group or degenerative joint disease group during protrusion in the horizontal plane. Mandibular rotational angle of the control group was significantly smaller than that of disc displacement without reduction group or degenerative joint disease group during protrusion in the horizontal plane(p<0.05). 6. In NHP, disc displacement without reduction group and degenerative joint disease group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles during lateral excursion to the affected side than during lateral excursion to the non-affected side in both frontal and horizontal planes(p<0.05). The findings indicate that changes in head posture can influence mandibular rotational torque movements. The more advanced state is a progressive stage of TMDs, the more influenced by FHP are mandibular rotational torque movements of the patients with TMDs.