• Title/Summary/Keyword: SSARR-8 model

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Low Flow Analysis of the Nakdong River Basin by SSARR-8 Model (SSARR-8 모형을 이용한 낙동강 수계의 저수유출 해석)

  • Gang, Ju-Hwan;Lee, Gil-Seong;Kim, Nam-Il
    • Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
    • /
    • v.31 no.1
    • /
    • pp.71-84
    • /
    • 1998
  • The SSARR model adopting IS(integrated snowband) watershed model is applied to the Nakdong River basin for low flow analysis. The IS watershed model is added to new version of the SSARR which has functions of simulating evapotranspiration. infiltration and lower zone routing. It provides annual water budget information as an output file and can be operated by interactive mode. Sensitivity analysis for both cases of high and low flows was carried out, which becomes the knowledge base for model calibration. Model verification was performed using the relative errors of high flows and absolute errors of low flows at the control points. Monthly water budget analysis was done by IS watershed model. and it reveals that runoff coefficient is 52.6%

  • PDF

Lovflow Analysis of Nakdong River Basin by SSARR-8 Model

  • Kang, Ju-Whan;Lee, Kil-Seong;Hwang, Man-Ha
    • Korean Journal of Hydrosciences
    • /
    • v.10
    • /
    • pp.17-34
    • /
    • 1999
  • The SSARR model adopting Is(integrated snowband) watershed model is applied to Nakdong River basin for lowflow analysis. The IS watershed model is added to new version of the SSARR which has functions of simulating evapotranspiration, infiltration and lower zone routing. It provieds annual water budget informations as an output file and can be operated by interactive mode. Sensitivity analysis for both cases of high and lowflows was carried out, which becomes the knowledge base for model calibration. Model verification was performed using the relative errors of highflows and absolute errors of lowflows at the control points. Monthly water budget analysis was done by IS watershed model, and is reveals that runoff coefficient is 52.6%.

  • PDF

Impact of Climate Change on Runoff Analysis in the Geum River Basin (금강 유역에서의 기후변화에 대한 유출 영향 분석)

  • Ahn, Jung-Min;Jung, Kang-Young;Kim, Gyeonghoon;Kwon, Heongak;Yang, Duk-Seok;Shin, Dongseok
    • Journal of Environmental Science International
    • /
    • v.26 no.5
    • /
    • pp.549-561
    • /
    • 2017
  • Recently IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change, 2007) pointed out that global warming is a certain ongoing process on the earth, due to which water resources management is becoming one of the most difficult tasks with the frequent occurrences of extreme floods and droughts. In this study we made runoff predictions for several control points in the Geum River by using the watershed runoff model, SSARR (Streamflow Synthesis and Reservoir Regulation Model), with daily RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios for 100 year from 1st Jan 2006 to 31st Dec 2100 at the resolution of 1 km given by Climate Change Information Center. As a result of, the Geum River Basin is predicted to be a constant flow increases, and it showed a variation in the water circulation system. Thus, it was found that the different seasonality occurred.

Estimation of ESP Probability considering Weather Outlook (기상예보를 고려한 ESP 유출 확률 산정)

  • Ahn, Jung Min;Lee, Sang Jin;Kim, Jeong Kon;Kim, Joo Cheol;Maeng, Seung Jin;Woo, Dong Hyeon
    • Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment
    • /
    • v.27 no.3
    • /
    • pp.264-272
    • /
    • 2011
  • The objective of this study was to develop a model for predicting long-term runoff in a basin using the ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) technique and review its reliability. To achieve the objective, this study improved not only the ESP technique based on the ensemble scenario analysis of historical rainfall data but also conventional ESP techniques used in conjunction with qualitative climate forecasting information, and analyzed and assessed their improvement effects. The model was applied to the Geum River basin. To undertake runoff forecasting, this study tried three cases (case 1: Climate Outlook + ESP, case 2: ESP probability through monthly measured discharge, case 3: Season ESP probability of case 2) according to techniques used to calculate ESP probabilities. As a result, the mean absolute error of runoff forecasts for case 1 proposed by this study was calculated as 295.8 MCM. This suggests that case 1 showed higher reliability in runoff forecasting than case 2 (324 MCM) and case 3 (473.1 MCM). In a discrepancy-ratio accuracy analysis, the Climate Outlook + ESP technique displayed 50.0%. This suggests that runoff forecasting using the Climate Outlook +ESP technique with the lowest absolute error was more reliable than other two cases.