• 동의생리병리학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.232-246
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this research is to contribute to clinical researches on neck pain and cervical spondylosis by reviewing the latest research trends and evaluation tools through the analyses of clinical studies on neck pain and cervical spondylosis over the last 5 years. 70 papers satisfying the selection conditions among the RCT papers that had been searched as "neck pain" or "cervical spondylosis" at Pubmed(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) from March 2011 to February 2016 were targeted. Papers were numbered in order of their publication dates and analyzed by classifying their contents into 1) pain classification, 2) treatment type, 3) treatment duration, 4) treatment time, 5) number of participants, 6) evaluation tools and methods of research, and 7) evaluation duration. 55 papers targeted chronic neck pain, 6 papers acute and subacute neck pain, and 2 papers subacute and chronic neck pain. In comparison by intervention, 43 papers corresponded to physical therapy, 3 papers to acupuncture, 1 to herbal fomentation, 5 to medication, and 18 papers corresponded to multilateral comparisons comparing the efficacy by various interventions. In research period, there were 50 papers based on treatment period, 16 papers based on the number of treatments, and 4 papers based on different periods depending on each group. In treatment duration, the cases from 1 month or more to less than 3 months were most, followed by the cases of less than 1 month, and the cases from 3 months or more to less than 6 months. In treatment frequency, the number of treatments of the treatment group was the same as that of the control group in 51 papers, and many treatments were conducted by the methods of acupuncture, manual therapy, and injection therapy in cases of once or twice of treatments, and physical therapy and electroacupuncture corresponded mainly to the cases from 3 times or more to less than 10 times of treatments, and retrospective observation and exercise programs corresponded mainly to the cases of more than 30 times of treatments. In the number of subjects of the researches, the cases from 50 or more to less than 100 were most, followed by the cases from 20 or more to less than 50. There were 7 evaluation tools cited 10 times or more: VAS, NRS, PPT, NDI, NPQ, CROM, and SF-36. In evaluation period, 37 papers evaluated only during the treatment period, and 33 papers conducted follow-up. In follow-up period, the cases of less than 3 months were most, followed by the cases from 6 months or more to less than 1 year, and the cases from 3 months or more to less than 6 months. When planning clinical researches on cervical pain in the future, appropriate intervention methods, frequency and duration of treatment, period of follow-up, appropriate number of subjects and selection of evaluation tools for objective validity will have to be considered. In addition, randomization, double-blind, etc. will have to be considered for researches with high basis level.

• 대한감각통합치료학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.27-36
• /
• 2009

서론: 작업치료사들이 임상에서 아동의 감각통합 기능을 평가할 때, 기초적인 요소로써의 감각, 운동에 관한 신경근계 검사로써임상관찰을 사용하는 것은 표준화된 검사들을 보완하는 것과 더불어 보다 정확한 추론을 위해 중요한 것으로 여겨진다. COMPS(Clinical Observations of Motor and Postural Skills)는 임상관찰의 일부 내용을 7개 항목으로 정리하여 통계적으로 표준화 한 검사도구로서 아동의 문제가 신경근계와 감각통합에 기인한 것인지를 보다 간소한 과정을 거쳐 선별'하는 데 목적을 두고 있다. 선행연구들에서 부분적으로 국내 아동의 점수가 외국규준에 비해 높은 것으로 나타나는 등, 국내 적용을 위한 연구가 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국내 일반아동에게 COMPS를 실시하여 국내의 정상군 검사결과와 항목에 대한 분석을 통해 우리나라에 맞는 발달기준을 제시하고자 하였다. 연구방법: 7~9세 남학생 76명, 여학생 70명을 대상으로 하였다. 연령대별로는 7세군에서 남학생 21명, 여학생 29명, 8세군에서 남학생 32명, 여학생 22명, 9세군에서 남학생 23명, 여학생 19명이었다. 결과 분석은 COMPS 항목에 대한 성별, 연령별 차이를 분석하기 위해 t 검정과 ANOVA를 실시하였다. 결과: 남녀 성별간에는 복와위 신전 항목을 제외한 나머지 6개 항목에서는 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 연령별 결과는 7세와 9세간의 차이를 유의미하게 보이는 항목이 느린 동작, 손가락-코 짚기, 비대칭경반사, 배와위 굴곡이었고, 8세와 9세간에서는 느린 동작, 손가락-코 짚기, 비대칭경반사 항목에서 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 7세와 8세간에서는 통계적으로 유의미한 차이는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 본 연구를 통하여 국내의 7~9세 사이의 임상관찰검사를 통한 신경근계의 발달적인 특성을 살펴볼 수 있었다. 연구대상을 보다 확대하여 국내인구에서의 임상관찰평가를 표준화하는 연구가 이루어질 필요가 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Genetic Medicine
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.67-77
• /
• 2010

목 적: 본 연구는 한국인 BRCA 유전자 돌연변이 가계구성원들을 대상으로 암진단 및 돌연변이 보유 여부가 심리 상태와 삶의 질에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 시행되었다. 대상 및 방법: BRCA 유전자 돌연변이를 가진 13가계에서 암에 이환된 보인자 17명, 이환되지 않은 보인자 16명, 건강한 비보인자 13명이 본 연구의 분석에 포함되었다. 이 세 군을 대상으로 우울, 불안, 낙관, 유전성 유방암관련 지식수준과 삶의 질을 설문을 통하여 평가하였다. 결 과: 설문시기는 유전자 검사 후 평균 21개월(6-35)로 세 군 간의 차이는 없었다(P=0.254). 세 군 간의 우울, 낙관, 육체적 삶의 질은 유사했다. 불안은 세 군 모두에서 일반인 보다 상승되어 있었다. 이환된 보인자의 정신적 삶의 질은 암에 이환된 보인자가 다른 두 군에 비해 유의하게 낮았다(P=0.009, P=0.017). 다변량 분석 결과 정신적 삶의 질에 영향을 미친 인자는 암이환여부(P=0.043)와 직업유무(P=0.008) 였다. 결 론: 같은 돌연변이 가계 내에서 돌연변이 유무는 우울, 불안, 낙관에서 심리적반작용을 일으키지 않았으나, 돌연변이 가계 구성원의 불안 수준은 돌연변이 유무에 관계 없이 높았다. 본 연구는 소규모 표본을 대상으로 한 단면적 연구이나, BRCA 유전자 검사에 수반될 수 있는 심리적 스트레스 및 그에 대한 대처법을 수립하는 데 기초연구로 의의를 가진다.

• 대한임상검사과학회지
• /
• 제44권2호
• /
• pp.52-58
• /
• 2012

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) often have more aggravated symptoms in the supine position. We tried to investigate the clinical characteristics and the predictive factors for positional OSA. Polysomnographic data were reviewed for OSA patients (apnea hypopnea index, $AHI{\geq}5$) from April, 2008 to April, 2011 at the Asan Medical Center. Clinical data, comorbid medical condition data and questionnaires (SF-36, MFI-20, ESS, BDI, STAI) were assessed. All patients were classified into two groups: positional patients (PP) group and non-positional patients (NPP) group. PP was defined as a patient who had the AHI in the supine position was at least twice as high as that in the lateral position. The body position of patients was confirmed by sleep position sensor and video monitor. All patients had at least 30 minutes of positional and 30 minutes of non-positional sleep. We compared clinical, medical, polysomnographic data, and questionnaire results between two (PP and NPP) groups and investigated predictive factors for the PP group using binary logistic regression analysis. In total, 371 patients were investigated. 265 (71.4%) was categorized as PP group and 106 (28.5%) as NPP group. The mean age ($mean{\pm}SD$) was higher in the PP group ($52.4{\pm}9.8$) than in the NPP group ($49.5{\pm}11.9$) (p<0.05). Comparison of sleep parameters between the PP and the NPP group showed that the PP group had significantly lower BMI (PP: $26.1{\pm}3.2kg/m^2$; NPP: $27.8{\pm}4.3kg/m^2$, p<0.001), neck circumference (PP: $39.7{\pm}2.8cm$; NPP: $41.5{\pm}3.7cm$, p<0.001) and hypertension rate (PP: n=89/265 (33.5%); NPP: n=48/106 (45.2%), p=0.0240). In the PP group, the percentage of deep sleep (PP: $8.7{\pm}8.1%$; NPP: $5.6{\pm}7.0%$, P=0.001) and rapid eye movement (REM) (PP: $17.5{\pm}6.1%$; NPP: $14.0{\pm}6.9%$, p<0.001) were significantly higher whereas the percentage of light sleep (stage N1) was significantly lower than the NPP group (PP: $30.4{\pm}12.3$; NPP: $44.5{\pm}20.8%$, p<0.001). During the sleep, the AHI in the supine position (PP: $48.6{\pm}19.5$; NPP: $60.5{\pm}22.6$, p<0.001) and in the non-supine position (PP: $9.4{\pm}8.9$; NPP: $48.4{\pm}24.8$, p=<0.001) were significantly lower and the minimal arterial oxygen saturation in non-REM sleep was significantly higher in the PP group (PP: $80.3{\pm}7.6$; NPP: $75.1{\pm}9.9$, p=<0.001). There were no significant differences in all questionnaires including quality of life. The results of the binary logistic regression analysis showed that age, the amount of REM sleep(%) and AHI were significant predictive factors for positional OSA. The significant predictive factors for positional OSA were older age, higher percentage of REM and lower AHI. The questionnaire results were not significantly different between the two groups.