• Title/Summary/Keyword: Robert Irwin

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

The Early Light and Space Environments of Robert Irwin (빛과 공간 환경을 다룬 로버트 어윈의 초기 작업에 관한 연구)

  • Adcock, Craig
    • The Journal of Art Theory & Practice
    • /
    • no.9
    • /
    • pp.123-150
    • /
    • 2010
  • In his non-hierarchical approach to art making, Robert Irwin questions how art is made. In the process, he seems to come down on both sides of the Modernism versus Postmodernism debate. Insofar as he wants to advance the avant garde tenets of modern art, he can be thought of as a modernist. But insofar as he denies Modernism's claims for transcendental status, he can be thought of as a postmodernist. Irwin's light and space environments, in particular, are conditioned by their basic attachments to their surroundings. They reveal the commonplace, but largely overlooked, richness of visual perception. By encouraging his viewers to open their eyes, Irwin wants them to engage in an act of looking, one that manipulates the basic syntax of seeing. This paper discusses Irwin's contributions to the art of his time (basically the transitional period between Abstract Expressionism and Minimalism) using as an example a light and space environment he created as the backdrop for the "First National Symposium on Habitability." This work was later reprised in 1980 as an independent installation. These works are examined to show how Irwin's art displaces modernist notions of authoritative (and authoritarian) quality with postmodernist ideas of direct (and demotic) value.

  • PDF

Olafur Eliasson and the Reuturn of Medieval Aesthetics (올라퍼 엘리아슨과 중세미학의 귀환)

  • Chin, Jungkwon
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.19 no.7
    • /
    • pp.220-233
    • /
    • 2019
  • Hitherto there have been by and large three different approaches to the installation works of Olafur Eliasson; a soma-aethetic, politico-aesthetic and techno-aesthetic. But none of these provides us with the aesthetic descriptions of the light effect. This failure seems to arise from the lack of the conceptual tools suit for describing the atmospheric effect of 'light'. The symbolism of light, or the theological optics of Middle Age may help us to compensate for the lack of appropriate concepts needed for theorizing the effect of light used very frequently by contemporary installation artists. And this medieval aesthetics of light can also of service to elucidate some essential characteristics of the digtal visual culture in general.