• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.903-916
• /
• 2012

We need to use aesthetic landscape assessment(ALA) as the means of riparian buffer zone(RBZ) management. This study verified the political validity of designation policy of RBZ and land purchase policy. The purpose of this study was to propose RBZ landscape management strategies through ALA of RBZ in Gyeongan Stream for the better attractive and healthy riparian landscapes. The natural type landscape units(LUs) covered 40.9% of the entire area and the cultivated land type LUs covered 20.58%. Landscape assessment consisted of landscape quality and landscape integration assessment. The criteria for assessing landscape quality(LQ) were naturalness, interest, uniqueness, and landscape function. LQ was ranked into five grades using a matrix. The landscape integration assessment consisted of an inner integration assessment in each LU and outer integration assessment among LUs. To review the propriety of designating the riparian area and the riparian ecological belt, differences in ecological appraisal and aesthetic valuation were reviewed through a t-test, Oneway ANOVA, and logistic analysis. The results of ALA, 29.15% of the entire area scored at grade 1 in LQ, while 31.95% scored at grade 5, indicating that grade 5 areas occupied a high share. Surveyed areas were divided into designated RBZ and undesignated RBZ. Results indicated that designated RBZ scored grade 1 in LQ took up 33.2% of the total, significantly higher than the 23.3% taken up by undesignated RBZ. When examined according to buffer distance, grade 1 areas within 50m took up 50.2% of the total area, lower than the 32.7% at buffer distances of 500m-1km. Results indicated a 1% statistically significant difference. Accordingly, analysis was undertaken for the expansion of designation of the riparian area and the selection of appropriate land for formation of a riparian ecological belt, and was designated at priority 1 and 2 for land purchase. This study can also contribute to the formation of a riverine eco-belt through discovery of design factors for upgrading the ecology, aesthetics, and landscape of the riparian area and application in determining land purchase priorities.

• 한국환경생태학회지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.126-134
• /
• 2021

식재된 수목이 활착되기 위해 소요되는 시간은 수종별로 차이가 있기 때문에 개별 수종에 대한 생장량 변동 추이 분석을 통해 관리 기간을 설정할 필요가 있다. 이에 본 연구는 수변생태벨트 조성 지역에 식재된 소나무의 연간 생장량 변화 분석 자료를 바탕으로 관리 기간을 제안하고자 하였다. 생장량을 분석한 결과, 식재 전에는 평균 0.6cm, 식재 후 1~2년차 0.3cm, 3~4년차 0.5cm, 5년차 이후에는 약 0.7cm 내외였다. 식재된 소나무의 생장량은 1~2년차 생장 불량, 3~4년차 회복 단계를 거쳐, 5년차부터 정상 생장 단계가 확인되었기 때문에 활엽수와는 달리 최소 4년은 집중관리가 필요한 기간으로 판단되었다. 수목별 활착에 필요한 기간은 차이가 있을 수 있기 때문에 생장량 연구를 통해 수종별 관리 기간을 설정해야 할 것이다.