• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.97-103
• /
• 2005

목 적 : 본 연구에서는 표준인 AP-WB(Weight-Bearing AP) 촬영법과 MTP(Semiflexed or metatarsophalangeal) 촬영법을 소개하고 판독 시 중요하게 여기는 관절간격과 신생골 묘출에 따른 항목을 각각 비교 고찰하여 골관절염 환자의 진단율을 향상시키고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 2004년 1월에서 2005년 1월까지 Knee Pain이 있는 환자로 본원의 류마티스내과에 내원한 220명(남:38명, 여:182명, 평균연령:57.3세)의 환자를 대상으로 표준인 AP-WB와 MTP검사를 병행하여 실시하였다. MTP검사는 20명의 모의환자로 발의 위치를 확인하며 슬개골이 슬관절부 정중앙에 위치하고, 관절강의 좌우대칭이 일치하도록 하였다. 관절간격과 신생골을 0(나쁨), 1(보통), 2(좋음), 3(아주좋음)점으로 구분하여 정형외과의사 3명, 류마티스 내과의사 2명, 방사선과 전문의 3명, 방사선사 5명이 PACS 모니터에서 영상을 Blind test하였다. 장비는 PHILIPS(Buckey Diagnostic-TH)를 사용하였고, 100 cm거리에서, 60 Kv, 8 mAs로 설정하였다. 결 과 : 위 방법으로 다음과 같은 결과를 얻을 수 있었다. 1. MTP 촬영법 : 발을 바깥쪽으로 $15^{\circ}$회전하고 무릎을 구부려 카세트 면에 대면 슬개골이 슬관절부의 정중앙에 위치하였고,관절강의 정렬에 따른 좌우대칭이 일치하였다. 2. 관절간격 점수 : AP-WB 촬영법; $1.32{\pm}0.050$, MTP 촬영법; $2.51{\pm}0.046$ 3. 신생골 점수 : AP-WB 촬영법; $2.14{\pm}0.054$, MTP 촬영법; $2.10{\pm}0.054$ 결론 및 고찰 : 이번 연구는 임상적인 판독 방법으로 관절간격과 신생골에 따른 점수를 비교 했을 때, MTP 촬영법이 가장 중요한 관절간격을 영상으로 표출하는데 있어서 기존의 AP-WB 촬영법보다 훨씬 더 우세하다는 결론을 갖게 되었다. 따라서 향후 골관절염 환자의 진단율을 향상시키는 데는 MTP촬영법이 유용할 것으로 사료된다.

• 근관절건강학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.90-103
• /
• 1996

The purpose of this paper is to compare two approach to assessment of coping patterns. The sampling method was a purposive sampling technique. The study participants were out patients 113 of rheumatoid arthritis center of one University hospitals in Seoul. Datas were collected from Nov. 13 to Nov. 24, 1995. The instruments used for this study were Graphic Rating Scales of pain, The Beck Depression Inventory and Coping Patterns tool. The collected data were analyzed for frequency, means, SD, factor analysis., Pearsons' correlations and ANOVA. The results were summerized as follows ; 1. When raw scores were used : there were not correlation in all three coping patterns. 2. When relative scores were used : there were significantly correlated in all three coping patterns. 1) Active coping and Positive-cognitive coping (r=-0.352, p< 0.0001) 2) Positive-cognitive coping and Negative-cognitive coping (r=-0.594, p< 0.0001) 3) Active coping and Negative-cognitive coping(r=-0.544, p< 0.0001) The results of this research with relative scales provided more insight into the correlation in all three coping patterns. 3. Pearsons' Correlations were computed for each coping pattern, age, pain level, duration of pain and BDI. 1) Using raw score : (1) Active coping was significantly related to pain level(sensory score ; r=0.268, p<0.05, affective score ; r=0.266, p< 0.05) (2) Positive-cognitive coping was significantly related to age (r=-0.252, p< 0.05), pain level (sensory score ; r= -0.244, p< 0.05) (3) Negative-cognitive coping was significantly related to depression level (r=0.312 p< 0.0001). 2) Using relative score (1) Active coping was significantly related to pain level(sensory score ; r=0.299, p<0.05, affective score ; r=0.246, p< 0.05) (2) Positive-cognitive coping was significantly related to age (r= -0.187, P< 0.05), pain level (sensory score ; r=-0.317, p<0.0001, affective score : r=-0.305, p<0.0001) and depression level(-0.339, p<0.0001)) (3) Negative-cognitive coping was significantly related to depression. level(r=0.313, p<0.0001). 4. When raw and realtive coping scores were compared to those of age groups, religious groups and BDI level(high, middle, low) ; 1) Using raw score : (1) Active coping : there were not significantly difference (2) Positive-cognitive coping ; 20-39 age group and 50-59age group had significantly higher scores than over 60age group. BDI-low level group had significantly higher scores than other groups. (3) Negative-cognitive coping : 20-39age group and over 60age group had significantly higher scores than 40-49age group. Non-religious group had significantly higher scores than christian group. BDI-high level group had significantly higher scores than other groups. 2) Using relative score : (1) Active coping : over 60 age group had significantly higher scores than 20-39 age group and 40-49age group had significantly higher scores than 20-39 age group (2) Positive-cognitive coping ; 40-49age group, 20-39age group and 50-59age group had significantly higher scores than over 60age group. Christian group had significantly higher scores than non-religious group. BDI-low level group had significantly higher scores than other groups. (3) Negative-cognitive coping ; Non-religious group had significantly higher scores than christian group and buddhistic group. BDI-high level group had significantly higher scores than other groups. The current data suggest that relative scores may yield a different perspective on coping patters than raw scores. The use of relative scores reveals the relation clearly, without its being blurred statistically by the effect of other coping strategies or being relegated to a partial correlation. The use of relative scores holds promise for delineating the relations between ways of coping and health-related behavior.