• Title/Summary/Keyword: Reverse transcription droplet digital PCR

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Application of Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR for Detection and Quantification of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR을 활용한 Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus 검출 및 정량)

  • Lee, Hyo-Jeong;Park, Ki Beom;Han, Yeon Soo;Jeong, Rae-Dong
    • Research in Plant Disease
    • /
    • v.27 no.3
    • /
    • pp.120-127
    • /
    • 2021
  • Plant viruses cause significant yield losses, continuously compromising crop production and thus representing a serious threat to global food security. Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) is the most harmful plant virus that mainly infects horticultural crops and has a wide host range. Reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) has been widely used for detecting TSWV with high sensitivity, but its application is limited owing to the lack of standardization. Therefore, in this study, a sensitive and accurate reverse transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (RT-ddPCR) method was established for TSWV detection. Additionally, we compared the sensitivities of RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR for TSWV detection. Specificity analysis of RT-ddPCR for TSWV showed no amplification for main pepper viruses and negative control. TSWV transcripts levels measured by RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR showed a high degree of linearity; however, the former yielded results that were at least 10-fold more sensitive and detected lower TSWV copy numbers than the latter. Collectively, our findings show that RT-ddPCR provides improved analytical sensitivity and specificity for TSWV detection, making it suitable for identifying low TSWV concentrations in field samples.

Detection and Quantification of Apple Stem Grooving Virus in Micropropagated Apple Plantlets Using Reverse-Transcription Droplet Digital PCR

  • Kim, Sung-Woong;Lee, Hyo-Jeong;Cho, Kang Hee;Jeong, Rae-Dong
    • The Plant Pathology Journal
    • /
    • v.38 no.4
    • /
    • pp.417-422
    • /
    • 2022
  • Apple stem grooving virus (ASGV) is a destructive viral pathogen of pome fruit trees that causes significant losses to fruit production worldwide. Obtaining ASGV-free propagation materials is essential to reduce economic losses, and accurate and sensitive detection methods to screen ASGV-free plantlets during in vitro propagation are urgently necessary. In this study, ASGV was sensitively and accurately quantified from in vitro propagated apple plantlets using a reverse transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (RT-ddPCR) assay. The optimized RT-ddPCR assay was specific to other apple viruses, and was at least 10-times more sensitive than RT-real-time quantitative PCR assay. Furthermore, the optimized RT-ddPCR assay was validated for the detection and quantification of ASGV using micropropagated apple plantlet samples. This RT-ddPCR assay can be utilized for the accurate quantitative detection of ASGV infection in ASGV-free certification programs, and can thus contribute to the production of ASGV-free apple trees.

Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2 Primer-Probe Sets

  • Park, Changwoo;Lee, Jina;Hassan, Zohaib ul;Ku, Keun Bon;Kim, Seong-Jun;Kim, Hong Gi;Park, Edmond Changkyun;Park, Gun-Soo;Park, Daeui;Baek, Seung-Hwa;Park, Dongju;Lee, Jihye;Jeon, Sangeun;Kim, Seungtaek;Lee, Chang-Seop;Yoo, Hee Min;Kim, Seil
    • Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
    • /
    • v.31 no.3
    • /
    • pp.358-367
    • /
    • 2021
  • The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an international health emergency. Current diagnostic tests are based on the reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) method, which is the gold standard test that involves the amplification of viral RNA. However, the RT-qPCR assay has limitations in terms of sensitivity and quantification. In this study, we tested both qPCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect low amounts of viral RNA. The cycle threshold (CT) of the viral RNA by RT-PCR significantly varied according to the sequences of the primer and probe sets with in vitro transcript (IVT) RNA or viral RNA as templates, whereas the copy number of the viral RNA by ddPCR was effectively quantified with IVT RNA, cultured viral RNA, and RNA from clinical samples. Furthermore, the clinical samples were assayed via both methods, and the sensitivity of the ddPCR was determined to be equal to or more than that of the RT-qPCR. However, the ddPCR assay is more suitable for determining the copy number of reference materials. These findings suggest that the qPCR assay with the ddPCR defined reference materials could be used as a highly sensitive and compatible diagnostic method for viral RNA detection.