• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.487-501
• /
• 1998

In the case of CAD/CAM ceramic inlay restorations, if isthmus width is widened too much, it may cause fracture of remaining tooth structure or loss of bonding at the luting interface because of excessive displacement of buccal or lingual cusps under occlusal loads. So to clarify the criterior of widening isthmus width, this study was designed to test the tensile bond strength and bond failure mode between dentin and ceramic cemented with luting composite resin cements. Cylindrical ceramic blocks(Vita Cerec Mark II, d=4mm) were bonded to buccal dentin of 40 freshly extracted third molars with 4 luting composite resin cements(group1 : Scotchbond Resin Cement/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, group2 : Duolink Resin Cement/ All-Bond 2, group3: Bistite Resin Cement/Ceramics Primer, and group4:Superbond C&B). Tensile bond test was done under universal testing machine using bonding and measuring alignment blocks(${\phi}ilo$ & Urn, 1992). After immersion of fractured samples into 1 % methylene blue for 24 hours, failure mode was analysed under stereomicroscope and SEM. Results: The tensile bond strength of goup 1, 2 & 4 was $13.97{\pm}2.90$ MPa, $16.49{\pm}3.90$ MPa and $16.l7{\pm}4.32$ MPa, respectively. There was no statistical differences(p>0.05). But, group 3 showed significantly lower bond stregnth($5.98{\pm}1.l7$ MPa, p<0.05). In almost all samples, adhesive fractures between dentin and resin cements were observed. But, in group 1, 2 & 4, as bond strength increased, cohesive fracture within resin cement was observed simultaneously. And, in group 3, as bond strength decreased, cohesive fracture between hybrid layer and composite resin cement was also observed. Cohesive fracture within dentin and porcelain adhesive fracture were not observed. In conclusion, although adhesive cements were used in CAD/CAM -fabricated ceramic inlay restorations, the conservative priciples of cavity preparation must be obligated.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.340-346
• /
• 2018

PURPOSE. In this study, the shear bond strengths (SBS) of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seven different cements [Polycarboxylate (PCC), Glass-Ionomer (GIC), Zinc phospahate (ZPC), Self-adhesive resin (RXU), Resin (C&B), and Temporary cements ((RXT) and (TCS))] were bonded to a total number of 224 square blocks ($5{\times}5{\times}3mm$) made of one pure metal [Titanium (CP Ti) and two metal alloys [Gold-Platinum (Au-Pt) and Cobalt-Chrome (Co-Cr)] under 10 N and 50 N seating forces. SBS values were determined and data were analyzed with 3-way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons and interactions among groups were analyzed with Tukey's simultaneous confidence intervals. RESULTS. Overall mean scores indicated that Co-Cr showed the highest SBS values ($1.96{\pm}0.4$) (P<.00), while Au-Pt showed the lowest among all metals tested ($1.57{\pm}0.4$) (P<.00). Except for PCC/CP Ti, RXU/CP Ti, and GIC/Au-Pt factor level combinations (P<.00), the cements tested under 10 N seating force showed no significantly higher SBS values when compared to the values of those tested under 50 N seating force (P>.05). The PCC cement showed the highest mean SBS score ($3.59{\pm}0.07$) among all cements tested (P<.00), while the resin-based temporary luting cement RXT showed the lowest ($0.39{\pm}0.07$) (P<.00). CONCLUSION. Polycarboxylate cement provides reliable bonding performance to metal surfaces. Resin-based temporary luting cements can be used when retrievability is needed. GIC is not suitable for permanent cementation of fixed dental prostheses consisting of CP Ti or Au-Pt substructures.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제53권3호
• /
• pp.195-200
• /
• 2015

Cementation is the last procedure and an important factor to access successful fixed prosthodontic treatment. Even though there are many kinds of luting materials in dental field, the resin cements are popularly used in now. Metals, polymers and ceramics are used as a material of fixed dental prosthesis. The bonding mechanisms between teeth and fixed restorations are composed of mechanical and chemical mechanism. In dentistry, we are relying on mechanical bonding, but we tried to get chemical bonding and many ways are introduced. So, we have to approach luting procedure differently by the materials of prosthesis for clinical success. In this article, let us think the proper cementation ways according to each prosthesis material.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제53권3호
• /
• pp.178-186
• /
• 2015

Dental polymer-based luting materials are classified into esthetic resin cement, adhesive resin cement and self-adhesive resin cement. Due to the different component of each type of resin cement, the preconditioning method of tooth surface and the steps are different from each type of resin cement. The pre-treatment of adherend (ceramic, resin and metal) surface also varies with the type of resin cement and the manufacturer. In this study, the characteristics of each type of resin cement, mechanical properties, indication and advantages were investigated. Through these, clinical tips on using resin cements were suggested.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.212-224
• /
• 1994

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare film thickness of five kinds of resin luting cements [Comspan, Panavia Ex, Maryland bridge adhesive, All-bond C & B cementation kit, and Super-bond C & B]. Zinc-phosphate cement and glass-ionomer cement were used as the control group. In order to measure the film thickness the methods used were in broad compliance with ADA Specification No. 8, a tapered-die system that simulates clinical conditions more closely, and the connected tapered-die system that simulates bridge conditions. The inorganic filler size of resin cements was also examined with scanning electron micrographs. The results were obtained as follows ; 1. The film thickness of resin cements was increased in the order of Comspan, Panavia Ex, Super-bond C & B, Maryland bridge adhesive, and All-bond C & B cementation kit. Maryland bridge adhesive and All-bond C & B cementation kit showed significantly higher film thickness than the control group(p<0.01). 2. For all resin cements, there was a significant difference of film thickness between the ADA method and the tapered-die system. Generally, the tapered-die system demonstrated lower film thickness than the ADA method(p<0.01). 3. There was no significant difference in film thickness between the tapered-die system and the tapered-die bridge system in all resin cements(p<0.01). 4. The scanning electron microscope showed that the cement with larger filler had a tendency to be higher in film thickness.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제30권6호
• /
• pp.493-504
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 상아질 접착제와 레진 시멘트의 적합성 여부를 알아보고자 시행하였다. 발거한 제3대구치의 상아질 표면을 노출시킨 후 Tescera ATL 복합레진 시편을 상아질 접착제 [All Bond 2 (Bisco), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray), Adper Prompt L-POP (3M), One-Up Bond F (Tokuyama)]와 레진시멘트 [Choice (Bisco), Panavia F (Kuraray), RelyX ARC (3M), Bistite II DC (Tokuyama)]로 접착하고 미세인장 결합강도 및 주사전자 현미경 관찰을 시행한 결론은 다음과 같다. 1. Clearfil SE Bond와 All-Bond 2가 Prompt L-Pop과 One-Up Bond F 보다 높은 미세인장 결합강도를 보였다(p<0.05). 2. Clearfil SE Bond와 All-Bond 2 사용시 1-step 상아질 접착제보다 혼성층이 두껍고 레진 tag가 길었다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.234-240
• /
• 2013

Objectives: This study evaluated the effects of intraradicular moisture on the pushout bond strength of a fibre post luted with several self-adhesive resin cements. Materials and Methods: Endodontically treated root canals were treated with one of three luting cements: (1) RelyX U100, (2) Clearfil SA, and (3) G-Cem. Roots were then divided into four subgroups according to the moisture condition tested: (I) dry: excess water removed with paper points followed by dehydration with 95% ethanol, (II) normal moisture: canals blot-dried with paper points until appearing dry, (III) moist: canals dried by low vacuum using a Luer adapter, and (IV) wet: canals remained totally flooded. Two 1-mm-thick slices were obtained from each root sample and bond strength was measured using a push-out test setup. The data were analysed using a two-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post hoc test with p = 0.05. Results: Statistical analysis demonstrated that moisture levels had a significant effect on the bond strength of luting cements (p < 0.05), with the exception of G-Cem. RelyX U100 displayed the highest bond strength under moist conditions (III). Clearfil SA had the highest bond strength under normal moisture conditions (II). Statistical ranking of bond strength values was as follows: RelyX U100 > Clearfil SA > G-Cem. Conclusions: The degree of residual moisture significantly affected the adhesion of luting cements to radicular dentine.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.26-49
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to confirm the formation of hybrid layer and resin tags in dentin tissue and the possibility of bonding between luting cements used for the prosthesis and the resinous surface coated with resin bonding agents to prevent the dentin hypersensitivity after abutment preparation. Some resin bonding agents, which may have the possibility of bonding with polyacrylic acid as a liquid ingredient of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements, were selected. All-Blond desensitizer containing NTG-GMA and BPDM, Scotch-Bond Multipurpose plus containing HEMA, and XR-bond containing organophosphate were selected as a coating agent. Dental cements were zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate, and glass ionomer cement. After the exposed dentin surface of premolars was ethced with 10% phosphoric acid and coated with resin bonding agents, the morphology of treated surfaces and the resin tags and hybrid layers on sectioned surfaces were observed by SEM. Shear bond strength between the resin bonding agents and 3 kinds of cements was measured 24 hours after bonding. On the debonded surfaces of the shear bond strength tested specimens, the cement tags and the bonding sites between the resin materials and cements were examined by SEM. Following conclusions were drawn : 1. Coating of dentin with resin bonding agents had no effect on the shear bond strength of zinc phosphate cement. 2. Both of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements showed the increased shear bond strength by the dentinal coating with Scotch-Bond Multipurpose plus containing HEMA. However, in the case of dentinal coating with some agents containing NTG-GMA and BPDM or organophosphate, polycarboxylate cement exhibited the lowered shear bond strength, and glass ionomer cement showed the unchanged shear bond strength. 3. Complete obstructions of dentinal tubules were observed on the dentin coated with All-Bond desensitizer or XR-bond, but distinct shape of the orifices of dentinal tubules was observed consistently on the dentin coated with Scotch-Bond Multipurpose plus. 4. The hybrid layer was thickest on the dentin coated with All-Bond desensitizer, and the length of resin tags was longest on the dentin coated with Scotch-Bond Multipurpose plus. 3. On the debonded specimens which had been bonded with polycarboxylate cement or glass ionomer cement after coating with Scotch-Bond Multipurpose plus, the cement tags and the bonding sites between the resinous surface and the cements could be examined.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.314-323
• /
• 2018

이 연구의 목적은 3종 시멘트의 전단결합강도를 평가하고 열순환 시행이 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 한다. 소아치과에서 사용되는 소아용 기성 지르코니아 전장관($NuSmile^{(R)}$ ZR crown)의 내면과 유사한 디스크 형태의 지르코니아 시편(Zirconia discs)을 제작하였다. 소아용 기성 지르코니아 전장관의 내면과 지르코니아 시편의 표면이 동일하도록 같은 몰드를 이용하여 제작하였으며 주사전자현미경을 통해 유사함을 확인하였다. 60개의 지르코니아 시편과 60개의 유구치 상아질 시편을 3종의 시멘트 $Ketac^{TM}$ Cem Permanent Glass Ionomer Luting Cement(KGI), $RelyX^{TM}$ Luting Plus Cement(RLP), $RelyX^{TM}$ Unicem Self-Adhesive Universal Resin Cement(RUR)에 따라 20개씩 나누고, 열순환 시행 유무에 따라 다시 10개씩 2개의 하위그룹으로 나누었다. 하위그룹 A는 열순환을 시행하지 않았고 하위그룹 B는 5500회의 열순환을 시행하였다. 만능 재료 시험기를 이용하여 전단결합강도를 측정한 후 파절 양상을 주사전사현미경으로 관찰하였다. 지르코니아 시편 및 유구치 상아질 시편에 접착한 시멘트의 전단결합강도는 RUR이 KGI와 RLP보다 높았으며 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다(p < 0.05). RUR의 전단결합강도는 열순환 시행하지 않은 군과 열순환 시행한 군 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제52권4호
• /
• pp.312-316
• /
• 2014

목적: 본 연구에서는 지르코니아 수복물의 접착에 사용되는 레진 시멘트의 파괴인성을 측정하고 각 레진 시멘트의 다양한 수중 보관 기간이 파괴 인성에 미치는 영향에 관하여 알아보고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 세가지 종류의 레진 시멘트(Panavia F2.0, Clearfil SA luting, Zirconite)를 사용하여 single edge notched 형태의 시편($3mm{\times}6mm{\times}25mm$)을 제작하였다. 각 시편은 $37^{\circ}C$ 증류수에서 1일 (대조군), 30일, 90일, 180일 동안 보관하였다 (n=5). 만능시험기를 이용하여 0.1 mm/s 속도로 삼점굽힘 시험을 시행하고, 파절 시의 최대하중으로 파괴인성($K_{IC}$)을 계산하였다. 측정값은 일원분산분석과 다중분석을 위한 $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ test를 사용하였고, 유의수준은 0.05로 하였다. 결과: 대조군에서 Panavia F2.0가 $3.41{\pm}0.64MN{\cdot}m^{-1.5}$로 가장 높은 $K_{IC}$를 보였으며 Zirconite가 $3.07{\pm}0.41MN{\cdot}m^{-1.5}$, Clearfil SA luting이 $2.58{\pm}0.30MN{\cdot}m^{-1.5}$으로 가장 낮은 $K_{IC}$를 보였으나, 재료간에 유의성 있는 차이는 없었다. 수중보관 기간이 증가함에 따라 Panavia F2.0의 값은 감소였고, Clearfil SA luting과 Zirconite는 증가하였으나, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: 지르코니아 수복물 전용 레진 시멘트의 파괴인성은 다른 일반 시멘트에 비해 대체로 높으며, 이러한 파괴인성은 수중 보관에 영향을 받지 않는다.