• 제목/요약/키워드: Research Evaluation

검색결과 25,655건 처리시간 0.04초

CORRELATION BETWEEN SPF INDEX AND SAFETY MARKER IN SUNCREENS

  • Kim, Jong-Won;Suh, Soo-Kyung;Park, Ju-Young;Park, Chang-Won;Seo, Kyung-Won;Kim, Kyu-Bong;Kim, Kwang-Jin;Kim, Jae-Hee;Lee, Sun-Hee
    • 한국독성학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국독성학회 2002년도 Molecular and Cellular Response to Toxic Substances
    • /
    • pp.195-195
    • /
    • 2002
  • In recent years, the safety of sunscreens has been challenged based on the reports of its adverse effect on users; dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, photoallergic contact dermatitis. To investigate a correlation between sun protection factor (SPF) and the safety of sunscreens, we measured in vitro SPF index using homosalate as a standard and examined the toxicity tests on cosmetics; primary skin irritation tests, ocular irritation test, and skin sensitization test.(omitted)

  • PDF

ASSESSMENT OF STABILITY AND ALLERGENICITY OF FOOD ALLERGENIC PROTEINS

  • Lee, J-H;Yoon, W-K;Han, S-B;Yun, S-O;Park, S-H;Lee, H-J;Yoon, P-S;Moon, J-S;Kim, H-C
    • 한국독성학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국독성학회 2002년도 Molecular and Cellular Response to Toxic Substances
    • /
    • pp.180-180
    • /
    • 2002
  • The potential allergenicity of the transgene products in genetically modified organisms (GMOs), has been an important issue. As a part of the risk assessment of GMOs, we investigated the physicochemical stability and the immunogenicity of food allergens to determine their allergenicity.(omitted)

  • PDF

Activation of toll-like receptor signaling by polysaccharide isolated from cell culture of Acantopanax senticosus

  • Ahn, H-J;Han, S-B;Yoon, Y-D;Lee, H-S;Moon, J-S;Lee, C-W;Lee, K-H;Park, S-K;Kim, H-C
    • 한국독성학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국독성학회 2002년도 Molecular and Cellular Response to Toxic Substances
    • /
    • pp.182-182
    • /
    • 2002
  • We investigated the mechanism of immunomodulatory action of polysaccharide isolated from cell culture of Acanthopanax senticosus (ASP). ASP was found to increase directly proliferation and differentiation of B cells, and cytokine production of macrophages, but not proliferation and cytokine production of T cells.(omitted)

  • PDF

출연연구기관의 연구회 단위 기관평가제도의 적합성 분석 (Relevance Analysis of Performance Evaluation Systems of Government S&T Research Groups)

  • 남영호;김병태
    • 기술혁신연구
    • /
    • 제14권3호
    • /
    • pp.117-154
    • /
    • 2006
  • This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the current institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRIs). Under the current evaluation systems, twenty GRIs are grouped into three Research Groups and each Group has its own evaluation systems. One problem of the current institutional evaluation systems is that the systems cannot reflect individual GRIs' characteristics. The following methods are used. First, based on four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton(1992)'s Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model, six perspectives appropriate to GRUs' characteristics are derived. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI Research Groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRIs' evaluatees are asked to allocate appropriate weights on the performance measures. Evaluatees' weights of a GRI are compared with average weights of the related Group. Finally in every BSC's perspective, GRIs that have extraordinarily over-scored or under-scored weights are analyzed in terms of GRIs' missions, customers, capability of human resources, etc. In the Basic Research Group, the Korea Basic Science Institute is deviated in the financial perspective and the strategic direction perspectives. In the Public Research Group, Korea Institute of Construction Technology is significantly different from other GRIs in three perspectives. Five out of eight GRIs in the Industrial Research Group, GRIs are significantly different each other in several perspectives. It could be concluded that the current institutional evaluation systems are least appropriate in measuring performance of the GRIs of the Industrial Research Group.

  • PDF

Neurotoxicity of Synthetic Cannabinoids JWH-081 and JWH-210

  • Cha, Hye Jin;Seong, Yeon-Hee;Song, Min-Ji;Jeong, Ho-Sang;Shin, Jisoon;Yun, Jaesuk;Han, Kyoungmoon;Kim, Young-Hoon;Kang, Hoil;Kim, Hyoung Soo
    • Biomolecules & Therapeutics
    • /
    • 제23권6호
    • /
    • pp.597-603
    • /
    • 2015
  • Synthetic cannabinoids JWH-018 and JWH-250 in 'herbal incense' also called 'spice' were first introduced in many countries. Numerous synthetic cannabinoids with similar chemical structures emerged simultaneously and suddenly. Currently there are not sufficient data on their adverse effects including neurotoxicity. There are only anecdotal reports that suggest their toxicity. In the present study, we evaluated the neurotoxicity of two synthetic cannabinoids (JWH-081 and JWH-210) through observation of various behavioral changes and analysis of histopathological changes using experimental mice with various doses (0.1, 1, 5 mg/kg). In functional observation battery (FOB) test, animals treated with 5 mg/kg of JWH-081 or JWH-210 showed traction and tremor. Their locomotor activities and rotarod retention time were significantly (p<0.05) decreased. However, no significant change was observed in learning or memory function. In histopathological analysis, neural cells of the animals treated with the high dose (5 mg/kg) of JWH-081 or JWH-210 showed distorted nuclei and nucleus membranes in the core shell of nucleus accumbens, suggesting neurotoxicity. Our results suggest that JWH-081 and JWH-210 may be neurotoxic substances through changing neuronal cell damages, especially in the core shell part of nucleus accumbens. To confirm our findings, further studies are needed in the future.

학술 활동 건전성 제고를 위한 연구업적평가 개선에 관한 연구 (A Study on Improvements of Research Performance Evaluation for Enhancing the Soundness of Academic Activities)

  • 노영희;강지혜;김용환;양정모;이종욱
    • 한국비블리아학회지
    • /
    • 제33권4호
    • /
    • pp.93-114
    • /
    • 2022
  • 본 연구는 올바른 연구문화 정착지원을 위한 대학의 연구업적평가 개선방안을 도출하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 국내외 연구업적평가와 관련한 사례를 조사·분석하고, 대학 교원과 연구업적평가 관계자를 대상으로 각각 설문조사와 면담조사를 실시하였다. 이를 통해 연구업적평가 원칙 수립 방향, 연구업적물 유형의 범주화 방안, 연구업적평가 방식과 절차, 필요 서류 등을 제안하였다. 구체적으로 첫째, 정량평가의 한계점을 보완하면서 평가의 타당성과 신뢰성, 투명성을 확보하기 위해 연구업적평가 시 고려해야 하는 8가지 원칙을 제시하였다. 둘째, 연구업적물의 주요 유형을 학술논문, 저서, 학술대회 발표로 범주화하였다. 셋째, 연구업적평가 방식으로는 정량 및 정성, 복수의 계량지표를 활용하는 하이브리드 평가를 제안하였다. 넷째, 연구업적평가의 절차로 총 11단계(필수 7단계)를 제시하였다. 다섯째, 연구업적 평가를 위한 주요 서류로 출판물, 평가서, 위원장 보고서 등을 제안하였다. 본 연구에서 제시된 연구업적평가 개선방안은 학문 및 연구 분야와 대학의 특성을 고려하여 유연하게 적용되어야 할 것이다.

정보시스템 평가지표 개발에 관한 실증적 연구 : 공공부문을 중심으로 (An Empirical Study on Development of IS Evaluation Indices : In Case of Public Sectors)

  • 정해용;김상훈
    • 한국경영과학회지
    • /
    • 제28권4호
    • /
    • pp.155-189
    • /
    • 2003
  • In this research, the comprehensive evaluation model of IS(information systems) for public sectors is theoretically constructed through reviewing and integrating previous IS evaluation-related research. This model is hypothesized to consist of five sectors(System Sector, User Sector, Organization and Management Sector, Resource Management Sector and Strategic Contribution Sector), ten evaluation items belonging to these five evaluation sectors, and sixty two evaluation indices for these ten evaluation items. The results of empirical analyses to test the validity of the research model show that the evaluation sectors turn out to be the same ones as proposed in the hypothetical model. The evaluation items(System Quality, Information Quality, Service Quality) in System Sector proves to be consistent with the hypothetical model. However, in case of User Sector, two evaluation items(Perceived Usefulness and User Satisfaction) which are included in the hypothetical model are found to be merged into one item(User Satisfaction). And, it is shown that four evaluation items such as the Efficiency of Internal Process, Customer Satisfaction, Organizational Innovation, and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement are included in Organization and Management Sector, differently from the research model in which the items, Organizational innovation and the Degree of Informatization competence improvement, are not divided. As a final result, sixty two evaluation indices that comprise all the evaluation items belonging to five sectors are found to be reduced to fifty seven ones through factor analyses, criterion-related validity tests and reliability analyses.

Evaluation research in Korean medical education: a systematic review

  • Hye Jin Park;Yu Ra Kim
    • Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
    • /
    • 제40권3호
    • /
    • pp.233-240
    • /
    • 2023
  • The purpose of this study aims to analyze research trends related to 'evaluation' in Korean medical education through a systematic review. This study used a systematic review method, which is a research methodology for research trends and 'literature analysis.' Researchers searched the Korean journal literature published until the end of December 2020 in the Korean research database with keywords related to medicine and evaluation. Thus, 5,205 cases were identified. Based on these data, 143 papers were selected through a logical screening process, requiring 1 month to complete the data search and analysis process. In terms of publications, medical journals overwhelmingly outnumbered nonmedical journals until 2015; however, after 2016, the number of papers published in nonmedical journals increased, and the number of published papers was similar to that of medical journals. In terms of evaluation-related research, research on student and program evaluations has been very active compared to that on accreditation. As the number of evaluation studies has gradually decreased over the past 10 years, preparing a plan to revitalize them in Korean medical education is necessary. Considering that the role of evaluation in education has been emphasized in recent years, research on reestablishing the concept of evaluation; developing evaluation indicators; analyzing the status of student evaluation, program evaluation, and accreditation; and deriving measures to improve medical education through evaluation is required.

AHP를 이용한 정부출연연구소 평가 모형 연구 (A Study on the Evaluation Model of Government-funded Research Institutes Using AHP)

  • 손은일;백창화
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제50권4호
    • /
    • pp.665-677
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the current status and investigate relevant indicators so that R&D performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes can proceed. A suitable performance evaluation model was presented based on the surveyed indicators. Based on the presented performance evaluation model, the importance was analyzed to calculate the weight for each indicator of the performance evaluation model. Methods: The method applied in this study presented a performance evaluation model based on the organizational performance evaluation cases of advanced overseas countries. By using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, the weight of each indicator of the performance evaluation model was studied. Results: As a result of examining the indicators necessary for the evaluation model, focusing on overseas cases, 13 evaluation items were derived. A weight was calculated for the importance of the study results. And the scientific/technical research results showed the highest excellence. Conclusion: Key indicators of performance evaluation suitable for government-funded research institutes were derived and presented through detailed modeling in three stages. A realistic model that can objectively evaluate the performance of government-funded research institutes was proposed using the AHP technique.