• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.22-37
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 유네스코에 등재된 세계유산 중 부정적인 역사를 증명하는 문화유산의 세계유산 등재전략에 대해 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 "부정적인 역사"와 이와 관련한 "교훈적 가치"를 지닌 유산을 포괄할 수 있도록 '기억유산'이라는 새로운 용어를 제시하였고, 이에 해당하는 세계유산 사례를 분석하였다. 특히 한국의 비무장지대와 유사한 역사적 배경 또는 형태를 지닌 유사 세계유산 사례를 중심으로 등재기준을 분석함으로써 향후 한국 비무장지대를 세계문화유산으로 등재 추진할 경우 적용 가능한 등재기준을 제시하고자 하였다. 이에 따른 연구결과는 다음과 같이 요약될 수 있다. 첫째, 기억유산은 유산 자체의 역사적 예술적 경관적 학술적 등의 가치보다는 보편적 의의를 갖는 사건이 발생한 장소로서 건축적, 경관적, 고고학적, 기술적으로 사건을 증명하거나 역사의 단계를 확인할 수 있는 건축물, 경관, 장소로서 평가되었다. 둘째, 기억유산은 등재기준 (ⅵ)과 함께 주요사건에 따라 등재기준(ⅲ) 또는 등재기준(ⅳ)를 함께 적용하여 등재 신청되는 경우가 많았다. 셋째, 한국 비무장지대의 경우 냉전시대를 증명하는 유산으로서 등재기준(ⅳ), 평화의 상징적 가치로서 등재기준(ⅵ)의 적용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제14호
• /
• pp.217-245
• /
• 2012

The aim of this paper is to show how the paradigm of disaster resilience may help reorienting urban planning policies in order to mitigate various types of risks, thanks to carefully thought action on heritage and conservation practices. Resilience is defined as the "capacity of a social system to proactively adapt to and recover from disturbances that are perceived within the system to fall outside the range of normal and expected disturbances." It relies greatly on risk perception and the memory of catastrophes. States, regions, municipalities, have been giving territorial materiality to collective memory for centuries, but this trend has considerably increased in the second half of the 20th century. This is particularly true regarding the memory of disasters: for example, important traces of catastrophes such as urban ruins have been preserved, because they were supposed to maintain some awareness and hence foster urban resilience - Berlin's Gedachtniskirche is a well-known example of this policy. Yet, in spite of preserved traces of catastrophes and various warnings and heritage policies, there are countless examples of risk mismanagement and urban tragedies. Using resilience as a guiding concept might change the results of these failed risk mitigation policies and irrelevant disaster memory processes. Indeed, the concept of resilience deals with the complexity of temporal and spatial scales, and with partly emotional and qualitative processes, so that this approach fits the issues of urban memory management. Resilience might help underlining the complexity and the subtlety of remembrance messages, and lead to alternative paths better adapted to the diversity of risks, places and actors. However, when it is given territorial materiality, memory is almost always symbolically and politically framed and interpreted; Vale and Campanella had already outlined this political aspect of remembrance and resilience as a discourse. Resilience and the territorialization of memory are not ideologically neutral, but urban risk mitigation may come at that price.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제34권8호
• /
• pp.69-76
• /
• 2018

This study is basically about the changing appearance of the big pavilion, Yeongnamnu in Miryang city belonging to the government guesthouse of Joseon dynasty. And the purpose of this study confirms that even if the appearance of the building has not changed, the function of the building changes because the reason why people think about the building is also different. First, looked at the appearance of architecture and the function of architecture that changes with the times. In the course of the research, the changes of pavilion were traced by dividing it into five from Kory? dynasty which was first established to the present. Then, tried to find out the change patterns by analyzing important events related to buildings or places in each period. As a result, the following facts were confirmed. 1. Because of the Buddhist repression policy in Joseon Dynasty, the Yeongnamnu changed from the temple pavilion to the government pavilion. 2. Throughout the Joseon Dynasty, Yeongnamnu was the representative scenic of Miryang City. 3. In the late Joseon Dynasty, Yeongnamnu was famous as a place where a woman named Arang devoted her life in order to preserve his fidelity. 4. Since 1910, Yeongnamnu has become an important cultural asset, and space has been widely used as a venue for various public events. 5. From 1945 to 1999, Yeongnamnu was used mainly for the events of Arang Remembrance and Miryang Culture Festival. And the inner space of Yeongnamnu was rarely used because people thought preservation is important.