• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.63-71
• /
• 2005

경찰은 위험방지의 영역에 있어서 경찰권을 발동할 책무를 가지지만, 위험방지를 위해 개입을 하여야만 하는지의 여부, 어떠한 개입 및 어느 정도의 개입을 하여야만 하는가에 관하여 재량에 의하여 결정할 수 있다. 그러한 재량에 따른 경찰의 조치는 침해적인 명령 강제를 내용으로 하기 때문에 국민의 권리를 침해하기 마련이다. 따라서 경찰권의 발동에는 법치주의의 원리에 따른 법률유보의 원칙에 따라 필연적으로 법적 통제장치가 따라야 찬다. 본 연구는 경찰작용의 통제법리로서 경찰권 발동의 한계를 중심으로 공공의 안녕과 질서를 유지하면서도 국민의 자유와 권리를 최대한 보장할 수 있는 합리적인 방안을 강구하여 경찰작용의 바람직한 방향을 모색하고자 한다.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.105-115
• /
• 2000

The purpose of paper is to investigate the characteristics of regulations on landscape management of historic city of Kyongju in Korea, compared with those of Nara in japan to answer the research question that what is the regulative characteristics of landscape management of historic city in Korea. We have analyzed the three laws of the two country - Urban Planning Law, Cultural Assets Protection law, and Building Law. This research has been done in terms of regulative systems of the two country and articles, ordinances, and bylaws on landscape managements of historic city Major components of urban historic landscape management are goals and devices of preservation, preserving actor, authorized actor permitting major planning change, regulatory power on landscape development, and backgrounds of enacting regulations. From this research, we have fond the fact that 1) Kyongju City has general and implicit objectives of landscape management based on conservation of natural environment while Nara City has concrete objectives of lansdscape management, 2) Kyongju City has no regulations on landscape planning while Nara City has systematic planning measures such as designation of landscape management district, planning for preservation of historic landscape, and planning for establishing urban landscape, 3) In an application of landscape management district, Kyongju City designate the district based on the general principle of urban planning district while nara City designate it in a more detailed manner such as district of preservation of historic landscape, district of landscape establishment, and district of building agreement. 4) Kyongju has no legal actor in implementation and management of historic landscape plan while Nara City has administrative organization and procedures, including citizen participation, public hearing, and voluntary participation, and 5) Kyongju City does not operate the consultation committee on landscape management just like Nara City operating. This research results will provide us the remedial insights for landscape preservation of such Korean historic city as Kongju, Puyo, and Chunju. Since our research is focused on the limited area of preserving landscape in historic cities in korea and Japan we need to study sociocultural issues on preserving urban historic landscape more in depth in the future.