• 제목/요약/키워드: Reference capsule

검색결과 41건 처리시간 0.018초

Bioequivalence Assessment of Acephyll® Capsule to Surfolase® Capsule (Acebrophylline HCl 100 mg) by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

  • Nam, Kyung-Don;Seo, Ji-Hyung;Yim, Sung-Vin;Lee, Kyung-Tae
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • 제41권5호
    • /
    • pp.309-315
    • /
    • 2011
  • A sensitive and specific liquid chromatographic method coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed for the analysis of ambroxol (active moiety of acebrophylline). After acetonitrile precipitation of proteins from plasma samples, ambroxol and the domperidone (internal standard, IS) were eluted on a C18 column. The isocratic mobile phase was consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate and methanol (10 : 90, v/v), with flow rate at 0.2 mL/min. A tandem mass spectrometer, as detector, was used for quantitative analysis in positive mode by a multiple reaction monitoring mode to monitor the m/z 379.2${\rightarrow}$264.0 and the m/z 426.2${\rightarrow}$175.1 transitions for ambroxol and the IS, respectively. Twenty four healthy Korean male subjects received two capsules (100 mg ${\times}$ 2) of either the test or the reference formulation of acebrophylline HCl in a 2 ${\times}$ 2 crossover study, this was followed by a 1week washout period between either formulation. $AUC_{0-t}$ (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve) was calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule. $C_{max}$ (maximum plasma drug concentration) and $T_{max}$ (time to reach $C_{max}$) were compiled from the plasma concentration-time data. The 90% confidence intervals for the log transformed data were acceptable range of log 0.8 to log 1.25 (e.g., log 0.8964 - log 0.9910 for $AUC_{0-t}$ log 0.8690 - log 1.0750 for $C_{max}$). The major parameters, $AUC_{0-t}$ and $C_{max}$ met the criteria of Korea Food and Drug Administration for bioequivalence indicating that Acephyll$^{(R)}$ capsule (test) is bioequivalent to Surfolase$^{(R)}$ capsule (reference).

Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Brands of Cefixime 100 mg Capsule (Suprax and Alpha-Cefixime) in Korean Healthy Volunteers

  • Choi, Dong-Hyun;Burm, Jin-Pil
    • Biomolecules & Therapeutics
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.182-186
    • /
    • 2007
  • Cefixime is an orally absorbed cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-negative bacteria and is highly resistant to beta-lactamase degradation. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two cefixime capsules, Suprax capsule (Dong-A Pharmaceutical Co., reference drug) and Alpha-Cefixime capsule (Alpha Pharmaceutical Co., test drug), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). Twenty-four normal subjects, $23.5{\pm}3.72$ years in age and $68.3{\pm}8.89$ kg in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized $2{\times}2$ cross-over study was employed. There was one week washout period between the doses. After one capsule containing 100 mg of cefixime was orally administered, plasma was taken at predetermined time intervals and the concentrations of cefixime in plasma were determined using HPLC with UV detector. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_{t}$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were calculated and ANOVA test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters. The results showed that the differences in $AUC_{t}$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ between two products were -3.91%, -2.23% and -3.18%, respectively, when calculated against the reference drug. The 90% confidence intervals using logarithmically transformed data were within the acceptance range of $log0.8{\leq}{\delta}{\leq}log1.25$ (e.g., $log0.8786{\leq}{\delta}{\leq}log1.0523$ and $log0.8889{\leq}{\delta}{\leq}log1.0512$ for $AUC_{t}$ and $C_{max}$, respectively). The 90% confidence intervals using untransformed data was within ${\pm}20%$(e.g., $-10.37%{\leq}{\delta}{\leq}6.73%$ for $T_{max}$). All parameters met the criteria of KFDA for bioequivalence, indicating that Alpha-Cefixime capsule (Alpha Pharmaceutical Co.) is bioequivalent to Suprax capsule (Dong-A Pharmaceutical Co.).

한미 SMEDDS 실리마린 연질캅셀 제제의 임상약동학적 특성 (Clinical Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Hanmi SMEDDS Silymarin Soft Capsule Preparation)

  • 박민수;유내춘;김경환
    • Biomolecules & Therapeutics
    • /
    • 제8권3호
    • /
    • pp.269-275
    • /
    • 2000
  • Silibinin(silybin) is the active component of silymarin from Silybum marianum and has hepato-protective effect. It is water-insoluble and has low bioavailability. To improve its bioavailability, self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) has been developed by Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company (Silyma $n^{R}$ 140 soft capsule). In this study, the pharmacokinetic profiles of Silyma $n^{R}$ were examined and compared it with a reference preparation, L Caps140 of B Pharmaceutical Company. This study was approved by Yonsei University Severance Hospital IRB(approval No. CR0004) and followed the bioequivalence test guideline of Korean FDA. Eighteen healthy adult volunteers were allocated based on 2$\times$2 Latin square cross-over design. They were given 2 capsules (each contains silymarin 140 mg (60 mg as silibinin)) of either drug at each period and crossed over after a week of drug-free washout period. Blood concentration of silibinin was measured by HPLC. The $C_{max}$ and AUC of the Silyma $n^{R}$ were 1542.0 $\pm$ 402.7 ng/ml and 3323.3 $\pm$ 824.7 ng.h/ml, respectively, and were significantly higher than those of reference preparation. The Tmax was 0.8 $\pm$ 0.3 h and significantly shorter than reference preparation. The $K_{e}$ and $T_{1}$2/ of both drugs were comparable. Percent differences in means against reference preparation were +88.3% for AUC, +222.6% for $C_{max}$, and -61.1% for $T_{max}$./.>././.>./.

  • PDF

오메프라졸을 함유한 울프로정과 로섹캅셀의 생물학적 동등성 평가 (Bioequivalence Evaluation of Omeprazole Preparations)

  • 지상철;이윤석;박은석
    • 한국임상약학회지
    • /
    • 제10권2호
    • /
    • pp.68-73
    • /
    • 2000
  • The bioequivalence of two omeprazole preparations was evaluated following their oral administration to 16 normal volunteers. The test product was 'Ulpro tablet' made by Boryung Pharmaceutical Co. and the reference was 'Losec capsule' made by Yuhan Corp. After one capsule or tablet containing 20 mg omeprazole was administered, blood was taken at predetermined time intervals and the concentration of the drug in plasma was determined with an HPLC method. AUC and $C_{max}$ were determined and analyzed statistically for the evaluation of bioequivalence of the two products. The differences in AUC and $C_max$ between two products were $0.45\%\;and\;2.83\%$, respectively. The powers for AUC and $C_{max}\;were\;89.2\%\;and\;>90\%$, respectively. Confidence intervals were within $20\%$ for AVC and $C_{max}$All of these parameters met the criteria of KFDA for bioequivalence, indicating that 'Ulpro tablet' is bioequivalent to 'Losee capsule.'

  • PDF

플루르비프로펜 서방캅셀의 약물속도론적 평가 (Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Flurbiprofen Sustained Release Capsule)

  • 박경호;이민화;양민열;이종원
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.179-186
    • /
    • 1993
  • In vitro dissolution test and pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of 150 mg furbiprofen sustained-release capsule (FPSR-150). As a reference product, 50 mg flurbiprofen conventional-release capsule (FPCR-50) was used. Dissolution tests of two products were run using the paddle method in 450 : 540 (v/v %) mixture of simulated gastric and intestinal fluids (K.P. VI) by adjusting medium pH according to time. FPCR-50 was dissolved very rapidly, and it took about 1.5 hr for FPCR-50 to be dissolved over 90%, whereas 15 hr for FPSR-150. Also, in pharmacokinetic study, ten healthy male volunteers were administered one capsule of FPSR-150 or two capsules of FPCR-50 (FPCR-l00) with randomized two period cross-over study. Significant differences between FPCR-l00 and FPSR-150 were found in mean times to reach peak concentration, mean resident times and mean terminal phase halflives, while not in AUC/Dose (Student's t-test). In ANOVA for AUC/Dose to compare the bioavailabilities of two FP products, there was no significant difference. From the comparison of the simulated steady-state plasma concentration-time curves following multiple medications of FPCR-50 (3 capsules a day, dosing interval=8 hrs) and FPSR-150 (1 capsule a day) based on the above results obtained from single doses of two FP products, it was noted that the medication of FPSR-150 is more useful in clinical application rather than FPCR-50.

  • PDF

케타스 캡슐 10밀리그램(이부딜라스트 10 밀리그램)에 대한 피나토스 캡슐 10밀리그램의 생물학적동등성 (Bioequivalence of Pinatos Capsule 10 mg to Ketas Capsule 10 mg (Ibudilast 10 mg))

  • 강현아;김세미;강민선;유동진;이상노;권인호;류희두;이용복
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • 제40권2호
    • /
    • pp.117-123
    • /
    • 2010
  • Ibudilast, 3-isobutyryl-2-isopropyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridine, is a nonselective inhibitor of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE). It preferentially inhibits PDE 3A, PDE4, PDE10 and PDE11 as well as a number of the other PDE families, albeit to a lesser extent. Ibudilast is used clinically to treat bronchial asthma and cerebrovascular disorders. Thes e clinical uses are based on the ability of ibudilast to inhibit platelet aggregation, improve cerebral blood flow and attenuate allergic reactions. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two ibudilast capsules, Ketas capsule (Handok Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.) and Pinatos capsule (Sam Chun Dang Pharm. Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). The in vitro release of ibudilast from the two ibudilast formulations was tested using KP Apparatus method with various dissolution media. Twenty six healthy male subjects, 23.31${\pm}$1.09 years in age and 70.45${\pm}$8.51 kg in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized $2{\times}2$ cross-over study was employed. After a single capsule containing 10 mg as ibudilast was orally administered, blood samples were taken at predetermined time intervals and the concentrations of ibudilast in serum were determined using HPLC/UV detector. The dissolution profiles of two formulations were similar in all tested dissolution media. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were calculated, and computer programs (Equiv Test and K-BE Test 2002) were utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and untransformed $T_{max}$. The results showed that the differences between two formulations based on the reference drug, Ketas, were 6.99%, -2.48% and 9.93% for $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$, respectively. There were no sequence effects between two formulations in these parameters. The 90% confidence intervals using logarithmically transformed data were within the acceptance range of log 0.8 to log 1.25 (e.g., log 0.8791~log 1.1861 and log 0.8347~log 1.1199 for $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$, respectively). Thus, the criteria of the KFDA bioequivalence guideline were satisfied, indicating Pinatos capsule was bioequivalent to Ketas capsule.

세프라딘 캅셀(세프라딘 250 mg)의 생물학적 동등성 (Bioequivalence of Cephradine Capsules (Cephradine 250 mg))

  • 최준식;이진환;박영진;범진필
    • 약학회지
    • /
    • 제46권4호
    • /
    • pp.290-294
    • /
    • 2002
  • Cephradine is an orally absorbed cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and is highly resistant to beta-lactamase degradation. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two cephradine capules, Cephradine capsule (Donggu Pharmaceutical Co., reference drug) and Cephradine capsule (Shinpoong Pharmaceutical Co., test drug), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration. Twenty-six normal volunteers, 24.6 $\pm$ 3.70 years in age and 62.4 $\pm$ 8.99 kg in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized 2 $\times$ 2 cross-over study was employed. After one capsule containing 250 mg of cephrdine was orally administered, blood was taken at predetermined time intervals and the concentrations of cephrdine in serum were determined using HPLC with UV detector. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as AU $C_{t}$ to $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were calculated and ANOVA test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters. The results showed that the differences in AUCt, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ between two products were 2.89%, 1.05% and 1.06%, respectively, when calculated against the reference drug. The 90% confidence intervals were within log0.8 $\leq$ $\delta$ $\leq$ log1.25 (e.g., log0.9803 $\leq$ $\delta$ $\leq$ log1.0734 and log0.9674 $\leq$ $\delta$ $\leq$ log1.220 for AU $C_{t}$, and $C_{max}$, respectively). Two parameters met the criteria of KFDA for bioequivalence, indicating that Cephradine capsules (Shinpoong Pharmaceutical Co.) is bioequivalent to Cephradine capsules (Donggu Pharmaceutical Co.).o.).o.).).o.).

지원자의 Cefixime캅셀제 생체이용율에 대한 생물학적동등성 연구 (Bioequivalency on the Comparative Bioavailability of Two Capsule Formulations of Cefixime in Human Volunteers)

  • 강원구;우종수;권광일
    • 한국임상약학회지
    • /
    • 제8권1호
    • /
    • pp.19-22
    • /
    • 1998
  • Cefixime is an orally absorbed 3rd generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and is highly resistant to $\beta-lactamase$ degradation. This study was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new test drug of cefixime (100 mg/capsule) relative to the reference drug. The bioavailability was conducted on 20 healthy volunteers who received a single dose (400 mg) of the test and the reference drugs in the fasting state, in a randomized balanced 2-way crossover design. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 12 hours. Plasma was analyzed for cefixime by a sensitive and validated HPLC assay. The major pharmacokinetic parameters $(AUC_{0-12hr},\;C_{max},\;T_{max})$ were calculated from the plasma concentration-time data of each volunteer. The $AUC_{0-12hr},\;C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ of the test drug were $36.91\pm11.85\;{\mu}g{\cdot}hr/ml,\;5.47\pm1.61\;{\mu}g/ml,\;and\;4.00\pm0.65\;hr,$ respectively, and those of the reference drug were $34.08\pm8.81\;{\mu}g{\cdot}hr/ml,\;5.25\pm1.40\;{\mu}g/ml,\;and\;4.20\pm0.62\;hr$, respectively. Mean differences of those parameters were 8.32, 4.29, and $4.76\%$, respectively, and the least significant differences at $\alpha$=0.05 for $AUC_{0-12hr},\;C_{max},\;T_{max}$ were 16.02, 13.78, and $11.76\%$, respectively. In conclusion, the test drug was bioequivalent with the reference drug.

  • PDF

뉴론틴 캡슐 300밀리그람(가바펜틴 300 mg)에 대한 건일가바펜틴 캡슐 300밀리그람의 생물학적동등성 (Bioequivalence of Kuhnil GabapentinTM Capsule 300 mg to NeurontinTM Capsule 300 mg (Gabapentin 300 mg))

  • 조혜영;강현아;박은자;오세원;문재동;이용복
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • 제35권3호
    • /
    • pp.193-199
    • /
    • 2005
  • Gabapentin is an antiepileptic drug that is structurally similar to ${\gamma}-aminobutyric$ acid (GABA), but does not interact with the GABA receptor. It does not bind significantly to plasma proteins, and is excreted to unchanged form in the urine. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two gabapentin capsules, $Neurontin^{TM}$ capsule 300 mg (Pfizer Pharm. Co., Ltd.) and Kuhnil $Gabapentin^{TM}$ capsule 300 mg (Kuhnil Pharm. Co., Ltd), according to the guidelines of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). The release of gabapentin from the two gabapentin formulations in vitro was tested using KP VIII Apparatus II method with various dissolution media (pH 1.2, 4.0, 6.8 buffer solution and water). Twenty six healthy male subjects, $22.46{\pm}1.86$ years in age and $67.64{\pm}7.24$ kg in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized $2{\times}2$ cross-over study was employed. After a single capsule containing 300 mg as gabapentin was orally administered, blood samples were taken at predetermined time intervals and the concentrations of gabapentin in serum were determined using HPLC with fluorescence detector. The dissolution profiles of two formulations were similar at all dissolution media. In addition, the pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were calculated and ANOVA test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and untransformed $T_{max}$. The results showed that the differences between two formulations based on the reference drug, $Neurontin^{TM}$ capsule 300 mg, were -2.03, -0.43 and 4.29% for $AUC_t$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$, respectively. There were no sequence effects between two formulations in these parameters. The 90% confidence intervals using logarithmically transformed data were within the acceptance range of log 0.8 to log 1.25 $(e.g.,\;log\;0.89{\sim}log\;1.09\;and\;log\;0.91{\sim}log\;1.09$ for $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$, respectively). Thus, the criteria of the KFDA bioequivalence guideline were satisfied, indicating Kuhnil $Gabapentin^{TM}$ capsule 300 mg was bioequivalent to $Neurontin^{TM}$ capsule 300 mg.

모빅캡슐(멜록시캄 7.5mg)에 대한 멜록시펜캡슐의 생물학적 동등성 (Bioequivalence of MeloxifenTM Capsule to MobicTM Capsule(Meloxicam 7.5 mg))

  • 이진성;탁성권;서지형;강종민;류주희;임성빈;홍승재;이경태
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • 제39권6호
    • /
    • pp.457-463
    • /
    • 2009
  • The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of meloxicam capsule, $Mobic^{TM}$ capsule( Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd., Korea) as a reference drug and $Meloxifen^{TM}$ capsule (Kukje Pharma Ind. Co., Ltd., Korea) as a test drug, according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration(KFDA). Thirty two healthy male Korean volunteers received capsule containing meloxicam 7.5 mg in a $2{\times}2$ crossover study. There was a one-week above washout period between the doses. Plasma concentrations of meloxicam were monitored for over a period of 72 hr after administration by using a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer(LC-MS/MS). $AUC_t$(the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 72 hr), $C_{max}$(maximum plasma drug concentration) and $T_{max}$(time to reach $C_{max}$) were complied from the plasma concentration-time data. Analysis of variance(ANOVA) test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$. The 90% confidence intervals of the $AUC_t$ ratio and the $C_{max}$ ratio for $Meloxifen^{TM}/Mobic^{TM}$ were log 0.8605-log 0.9847 and log 0.9765-log 1.1503, respectively. These values were within the acceptable bioequivalence intervals of log 0.80-log 1.25, recommended by KFDA. In all of these results, we concluded that $Meloxifen^{TM}$ capsule was bioequivalent to $Mobic^{TM}$ capsule, based on the rate and extent of absorption.