• 제목/요약/키워드: ROPS(Roll Over Protection System)

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.018초

OECD 인증을 위한 농업용 트랙터 캐빈의 구조 해석 (Structural Analysis of an Agricultural Tractor Cabin for OECD Certification)

  • 김현진;권영두;하창욱;정한경;구남서
    • 대한기계학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 대한기계학회 2001년도 추계학술대회논문집A
    • /
    • pp.431-436
    • /
    • 2001
  • A finite analysis of tractor cabin for ROPS design was performed. Finite element model was made to take account of the tractor cabin structures. Four tests were defined in OECD standard; (1) longitudinal loading (2) rear crushing test (3) side loading (4) front crushing test. The results of four independent analyses and sequential analysis are compared with test results.

  • PDF

OECD규정(제4항)에 기초한 농업용 트랙터 캐빈의 유한요소 해석 (Finite Element Analysis of an Agricultural Tractor Cabin based on the OECD Standard(code 4))

  • 하창욱;김현진;구남서;권영두
    • Journal of Biosystems Engineering
    • /
    • 제28권4호
    • /
    • pp.305-314
    • /
    • 2003
  • The ROPS of an agricultural tractor is designed to protect its driver when the tractor overturns. Although the current OECD tests to determine whether the ROPS meets the requirements of the OECD regulation are desirable, they need long time to test. We experimental time and effort by using CAE. We conducted a finite element analysis for the ROPS design of a Dae-Dong tractor cabin in an attempt to reduce the design and manufacturing time. This study shows the interpretative skill using MARC(v.2000) for designing ROPS and difference between the results of testing and FEA. Design process is generally divided into two phases: a concept and a detail design. The concept design uses simple analysis to predict structural behavior, whereas the detail design involves a finite element analysis performed by the results of the concept design. This study focused on the detail design and used Patran(v.2000r2) and MARC(v.2000) of the MSC software corporation. The model consisted of 4812 elements and 4582 nodes. Four tests. specified in the OECD standards, were performed: (1) longitudinal loading test (2) rear crushing test (3) side loading test (4), and front crushing test. Independent analyses were also performed for each test, along with a sequential analysis. When compared, the results of the independent and sequential analyses were found to be similar to the test results.