• 한국품질경영학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국품질경영학회 2010년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.386-389
• /
• 2010

In this research, we develop the model of selecting and setting technology modular alternatives. We compose the selecting process(CHP) after setting technology modular alternatives based on technical couple by Conjoint Analysis(CA). Through this process, we can have several advantages. (1) Increasing the accuracy of R&D project evaluation (2) Declining the load of pair-wise comparison.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.123-144
• /
• 2008

This paper describes a comprehensive approach to examine how technological innovation contributes to the renewal of a firm's competences through its dynamic and reciprocal relationship with R&D and product commercialization. Three theories of technology and innovation (the R&D and technological knowledge concept, product-process concept, technological interdependence concept) are used to relate technology and innovation to strategic management. Based on these theories, this paper attempts to identify the dynamic relationship between product innovation and process innovation using system dynamics by investigating that aspect of the dynamic changes in the closed feedback circulation structure in which R&D investments drive the accumulation of technological knowledge. Further, such knowledge accumulation actualizes product innovation and process innovation, subsequently resulting in an increase in productivity, customer satisfaction, profit generation, and.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.59-73
• /
• 2020

There is a growing interest in convergence. National R & D is also providing various policies and institutional support to promote convergence research. Convergence research, however, does not clearly specify its characteristics at the academic and government levels. This research proceeds with the process of collecting, refining, analyzing, modeling, verifying and visualizing national R & D data through the National Science and Technology Information Service (NTIS). The method is to derive the convergence research characteristics and to derive through text mining, focusing on the unstructured information of national R & D project data. The study confirmed that there was a difference in perception between the definition of converged research and the research site. In order to improve this, the research suggested that convergence among research subjects, collaboration among research topics reflecting various backgrounds and characteristics of researchers, and analysis of characteristics of convergence research using information were suggested in the process of establishing convergence policy.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.109-134
• /
• 2012

최근 시장의 글로벌화가 가속되고, 기업경쟁이 심화되는 환경에서 R&D는 기업의 지속적인 성장과 발전에 중요한 경영요소로 대두되고 있다. 이에 성공적인 R&D 활동을 위한 프로세스 및 세부활동들을 제안하고 검증하는 연구들이 활발하게 진행되고 있고 있으며 기업의 R&D 프로세스를 평가하고 개선하고자 하는 노력 또한 지속되고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 대부분의 기존 연구에서는 R&D 프로세스의 평가에 대한 구체적인 평가체계가 부재한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 프로세스의 성숙도 평가 모델로 개발된 CMMI 평가체계를 기반으로 R&D 프로세스에 적합한 평가체계를 개발하고자 한다. 특히 본 연구에서는 R&D 프로세스를 3가지 유형-신제품, 서비스, 원천기술 개발을 위한 R&D-로 구분하여 유형별 맞춤화된 프로세스 평가체계를 제안한다. 이를 위해 첫째, 유형 별 R&D 활동의 특징을 분석하고 이를 토대로 R&D 프로세스를 정의하고, 문헌 연구를 통해 각 유형에 적합한 R&D 프로세스별 세부활동을 도출한다. 그 후 CMMI 평가기법을 기반으로 한 R&D 프로세스 평가방법을 제안하며, 마지막으로 제안된 평가체계가 적용된 시스템을 구현하는 순서로 진행된다. 본 연구결과는 기업의 R&D 프로세스를 평가하고 개선하기 위한 구체적인 지침으로 유용하게 활용될 것으로 기대된다.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2003년도 제23회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.108-115
• /
• 2003

Government R&D Project Management in Korea has had considerable difficulties because of the lack of project monitoring systems and insufficient communication. The National Program for Tera-level Nanodevices (TND Program) is a ten-year R&D program for commercialization in the area of nano technology. Collaboration and communication among the various participants such as business companies, universities, and government R&D institutes are key success factors in this R&D program. TND Program office has developed a Web-based project management system. This system consists of mostly four sub-management functions: (1) Milestones management of all R&D projects; (2) DR (Design Review) management as the mechanism for checking the performance against milestones; (3) Project activity management using the WBS (Work Breakdown Structure); (4) Budget management. Additionally, it also has many R&D supporting functions such as technology information bulletin board, community management, and visual summary of project progress and performance. This system is effective for monitoring research project as well as measuring project performance of the overall research program. This Web-based system has become the useful tool of R&D moving target mechanism and effective communication and collaboration tool. System features and adoption process of the system are also suggested.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권8호
• /
• pp.411-419
• /
• 2012

연구개발을 통해 얻어진 결과물 자체가 잘 보존되고 관리되면, 기술이전 등 상업화에 유용하다. 그렇지만, 연구 현장에서 연구개발을 통해 얻어진 데이터셋이나 소프트웨어 등 성과물들은 개인별로 관리되고 있거나 제대로 관리되지 않아서, 재활용이 어려운 실정이다. 따라서 국가차원에서는 전체 연구성과물의 메타정보 수집을 통한 연구성과물 현황 관리와 이를 분석한 분석정보의 제공에 중점적으로 노력하고, 실제 연구개발을 수행하는 개별 연구원이나 기관들은 연구성과물의 재활용에 초점을 맞춘 성과물 관리가 필요하다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 연구성과물의 체계적인 관리를 위해서 연구성과물 등록, 저장, 조회/사용, 관리 등 연구성과물 관리를 위한 프로세스를 제시한다. 프로세스를 기반으로, 연구개발의 결과물을 관리하기 위한 시스템 아키텍처를 설계한다. 무엇보다 이질적인 형태의 스키마를 가지는 연구성과물을 통합 관리하기 위한 통합 데이터베이스를 어떤 모습으로 설계해야 하는가도 주요한 고려사항이다. 구현된 시스템은 사용자들에게 연구성과물에 대한 상세 정보를 보여주고, 사용자들이 연구성과물 자체도 편리하게 얻을 수 있는 환경을 제공한다. 연구성과물관리를 위한 효율적인 프로세스 및 데이터베이스의 설계는 연구성과물의 재활용을 위한 비용을 절감할 수 있으며, 연구의 연속성을 확보하여 질높은 연구성과를 창출할 수 있는 환경을 마련할 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회 2000년도 추계학술대회 및 정기총회
• /
• pp.52-55
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study is to develope a stage management model for R&D projects using expert system in order to evaluate the successful accomplishment and diagnose the success level of projects at each development stage. Constructing this model, we classified the development projects for electronic parts, and designed the basic system structure through causation analysis between the factors of success influence and R＆D process. We gathered the input data of expert system by enquete survey, and used ID3 algorithm in order to extract the reasoning rule.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.61-61
• /
• 1991

We propose a strategic R&D resource allocation and project selection model based on national R&D policy and objectives. First, contributions to R&D policy and objectives for each R&D area are evaluated by using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Second, fuzzy Delphi are proposed to estimate R&D budget for each R&D area. Then, a project selection grid is also introduced to implement two-phased evaluation for R&D project selection. We also discuss how to improve the consistency in AHP and how to reduce the pairwise comparison in AHP. The proposed model enables the decision makers to allocate R&D budget, and to evaluate and select the R&D proposals based on both the contribution to national R&D policy and objectives, and the size of each R&D area concurrently

• 경영과학
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.61-77
• /
• 1999

We propose a strategic R&D resource allocation and project selection model based on national R&D policy and objectives. First, contributions to R&D policy and objectives for each R&D area are evaluated by using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Second, fuzzy Delphi are proposed to estimate R&D budget for each R&D area. Then, a project selection grid is also introduced to implement two-phased evaluation for R&D project selection. We also discuss how to improve the consistency in AHP and how to reduce the pairwise comparison in AHP. The proposed model enables the decision makers to allocate R&D budget, and to evaluate and select the R&D proposals based on both the contribution to national R&D policy and objectives, and the size of each R&D area concurrently.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.581-599
• /
• 2013

Purpose: This study aims to analyze general types of R&D Quality Assurance(R&D QA) and to identify key quality elements for R&D QA. R&D QA is defined as all the planned and systematic actions to verify whether R&D processes are conducted in a proper manner and the results of R&D fully satisfy customers' requirements. Methods: The existing R&D QA guidelines and the some cases were reviewed. From the review, three general types are analyzed and thirteen key quality elements are identified. Then, the survey on the eighteen domestic experts has been conducted for prioritization of the identified elements. Results: As the result of this study, three types for R&D QA based on quality elements, standard process, and final evaluation are analyzed. Related to the first type, thirteen quality elements, e.g., administrative plan, project plan, process management and so on, are identified and prioritized. Conclusion: This study contributes to develop the baseline for R&D QA including the types and the key quality elements. It may be helpful for the institute that has an interest adopting R&D QA.