• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.177-205
• /
• 2016

점차 치열해지고 있는 경쟁환경은 기업들에게 생존을 위해 끊임없이 혁신적인 제품과 서비스를 창출하도록 요구하고 있다. 이러한 경쟁환경에 대응하기 위하여 기업들은 R&D 투자를 통하여 지속적인 혁신을 달성하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 경쟁과 기업의 R&D 투자의 관계를 고찰하였다. 이를 위하여 경쟁을 실질적 경쟁과 잠재적 경쟁으로 이원화하여 각각이 기업의 R&D 투자에 미치는 영향을 관찰하였다. 또한 이 관계가 기업의 목표대비 성과 수준에 따라 어떻게 달라지는지 관찰하였다. 미국 Compustat 데이터로 실증분석을 수행한 결과, 실질적 경쟁은 기업의 R&D 투자를 감소시키는 경향이 있었던 반면 잠재적 경쟁은 R&D 투자를 증가시키는 경향이 있었다. 이에 대하여 목표대비 성과 수준의 조절효과는 기업의 성과가 목표보다 낮았을 때는 실질적 경쟁의 음(-)의 효과를 강화시키고, 잠재적 경쟁의 양(+)의 효과를 약화시켰고, 목표보다 높았을 때에도 실질적 경쟁의 음(-)의 효과를 강화 시키고, 잠재적 경쟁의 양(+)의 효과를 약화시켰으나 그 조절효과는 기업의 성과가 목표보다 낮았을 때보다 더욱 강하게 나타났다. 본 연구를 통하여 실질적 경쟁 및 잠재적 경쟁과 기업의 R&D 투자의사결정의 관계 그리고 목표대비 성과 수준의 역할을 이해하는데 도움이 될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.91-112
• /
• 2013

This article aims at revealing the dynamic relationships between the energy R&D investment and economic growth in Korea. To achieve this goal, we reviewed the effects of energy R&D investments and tried to make the holistic interconnections for describing the feedback loops between energy R&D and economic system. Energy R&D investments develop the renewable energy, energy efficiency and $CO_2$ emission reductions technologies for accomplishing the national strategic targets. The rapid obsolescence of technologies makes the inefficiency and negative effects in governmental energy R&D investments.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.946-951
• /
• 2007

산업 발전을 지원하는 연구개발 관련 기관들은 R&D 사업에 대한 경제적 근거를 요구받고 있다. 본 연구에서는 R&D 사업의 경제적 파급효과 측정을 위해 예측적 비용편익 분석 방법을 사용한다. 가상현실평가모형으로 비용과 편익을 추정하여 주요 계량적 측도를 계산하는데, 한국표준과학연구원 산업측정 신뢰도 제고사업의 세부과제 중 정량적 평가가 용이한 3개 과제에 대하여 예측적 비용-편익 분석 방법을 적용한다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.23-36
• /
• 2023

Purpose - This study investigates the impact of equity financing on the valuation of R&D investments using a sample of firms from 33 countries from 1997 to 2018. Design/methodology/approach - I use a modified version of the valuation regression widely used in the literature. Findings - I find evidence that R&D investments are more highly valued when financed through equity. In contrast, debt financing does not affect the valuation of R&D investments. I also document that the impact of equity financing on R&D investment valuation weakens during the financial crisis. Research implications or Originality - In light of the distinctive characteristics of innovative investment, previous research investigates its relationship with financing. What remains unexamined, however, is how financing choices impact the way investors value innovative investments. This study seeks to bridge this gap in the existing body of research using a sample of firms from 33 countries from 1997 to 2018, for 22 years.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.285-294
• /
• 2011

R&D 투자로 인한 기술의 축적, 경제적 성과 및 파급효과에 대한 분석이 거시적인 측면과 타 부문에서는 다양하게 이루어지고 있으나 철도산업에 대한 분석은 미흡한 실정이다. 본 연구에서 성과목표 설정에 대해서는 선행연구에 대한 조사분석을 통하여 과학기술적 성과에 대한 공통지표로 지식재산권, 특허, 논문을 설정하고 성공적으로 종료된 철도 R&D 11개 사업의 과학기술적 성과에 대한 적정성을 검증하였다. 선행연구에서 투입요소로 투자금액에 의한 성과목표를 설정하였으나 정확도를 향상시키기 위해 투입요소로, 투자금액(RI), 자본적 투자금액(RCI), 인당 내부인건비(LCPM)를 적용하였으며 철도 R&D 11개 사업에 대한 횡단면 분석과 잔차 분석을 통하여 성과목표 모형을 설정하고 타 과제 분석을 통하여 실증분석과 타당성을 검증하였다.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2001년도 제19회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.145-156
• /
• 2001

This paper investigates the effect of imported technology on the economic growth of Korea. To this end, the relationship between input technology and economic growth are suggested in the numerical form and analysed empirically. The rates of return of technology investments, which are divided into the domestic R&D investment and the investment on imported technology, are estimated. Based on the result of this analysis, the rate of return of the input technology, which includes the domestic R&D investment and the investment on imported technology, are estimated as 31.4%, and this input technology is calculated as to contribute 8.9% on the economic growth rate of Korea. And the domestic R&D investment is fumed out to have bigger rate of return than the investment on imported technology during the surveyed period. However, the rates of return of detailed R&D investments, which can be divided into the investments on commercial R&D and basic science, were not calculated in this paper, because of the lack of data on this in this paper. As well, the time-lag effect, which is naturally believed to exist between the R&D investment and the economic growth, could not be analysed wit:1 the same reason. Thus when analysing the relationship between them, this paper tried to minimize the time-lag effect by using the long-term data of twenty-three years.

• 환경정책연구
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.33-57
• /
• 2013

환경원가를 환경투자와 비용으로 구분하여 이 두 요소를 유발하는 요인과 효과를 실증 분석하였다. 결과를 보면 수익성(ROS 등)은 환경관련투자 및 환경보전비용에 유의적인 영향을 미치지 않았으며 레버리지 비율은 환경투자활동에 음의 영향을 미쳤으며 R&D 비율도 악영향을 나타내었다. 한편 지배주주의 비중이 높을수록 단기적인 환경보전비용의 지출은 물론 환경시설투자 등에도 능동적으로 대처하였다. 그리고 환경관련투자와 환경비용을 통한 노력이 재무성과(ROS)에는 부정적으로, $CO_2$ 배출량의 감소와 같은 환경성과에는 긍정적으로 나타났으며 결과적으로 환경경제효율에는 긍정적 방향을 나타냈으나 유의적이지는 않았다. 이것은 환경관련지출이 $CO_2$ 배출량 감소와 같은 긍정적 효과를 초래하지만 재무성과가가 악화된 것만큼 $CO_2$ 배출량 감소효과가 따라가지 못한다는 사실을 의미한다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.31-40
• /
• 2017

In this paper, we compared the efficiencies of national R&D investments between NT (Nanotechnology) areas in terms of papers, patents, and commercializations, and found ways to improve the efficiencies of national R&D investments for each NT area. This is in response to huge R&D investments government has made recently in NT areas. Here, we collected data on investments, papers, patents, and commercializations for the R&D projects in NT areas through National Science & Technology Information Service. Based on the data, we analyzed the investment and performances (papers, patents, and commercializations) for each NT area, calculated the efficiency for each NT area, and compared the efficiencies between NT areas. Next, using cluster analysis, we identified several NT areas with similar characteristics in terms of paper efficiency, patent efficiency and commercialization efficiency. Finally, we derived implications for the efficiency enhancement for each grouping. The cluster analysis showed that there could be two groups, one being low in terms of technological outcome (papers and patents) efficiencies and high in terms of commercialization efficiencies, while the other being high in terms of technological outcome (papers and patents) efficiencies and low in terms of commercialization efficiencies. Therefore, the strategy for one group calls for support for technology transfer or technology introduction from other R&D performers and grant of guidance for improving R&D performers' commercialization ability to other R&D performers while the strategy for the other group calls for R&D support for transfer of technology to other R&D performers, activation of technology transfer and support for commercialization of R&D performers.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.279-297
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the determinants of company R＆D investment with zero observations by using the data of R＆D Scoreboard published by Ministry of Science and Technology(2002). Conventional parametric approach to dealing with zero investments is not robust to heteroscedastic and/or non-normal error structure. Thus, this study applies symmetrically trimmed least squares(STLS) estimation as a semi-parametric approach to dealing with zero R&D investments. The result of specification test indicates the semi-parametric approach outperforms the parametric approach significantly. Moreover, the results of the study provide various implications as summarized below. The R&D investment of IT company is larger than that of non-IT company. The R&D investment has a positive relation to foreigners' investment ratio. The higher degree of financial self-reliance is, the larger the R&D investment is. Firm size variables such as sales amount and the number of workers are positively related to R&D investment. The sales elasticity of R&D investment is larger than one. However, the workers elasticity of R&D investment is smaller than one.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.625-645
• /
• 2018

This paper's objective is to draw a decision guideline to continue research and development (R&D) investments in biotech start-ups facing the "Valley of Death" syndrome - a long negative profit period during a financial crisis. The data include financial indices as Net income, Revenues, Total stockholders' equity, Cash & equivalents, and R&D expenses of 18 major biotech companies (nine in negative profit and nine positive, in FY2008) and 15 major pharmaceutical corporations as benchmarks both in FY2008 and in FY2016 derived from the US SEC Database, EDGAR. A first methodology dealing with real options analysis assumes Total stockholders' equity as a growth option. And a second methodology, Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis, is applied to test the probability relationship between the Total stockholders' equity and the R&D expenses in these three groups. This study confirms that Total stockholders' equity can play the role of a call option to support continuing R&D investments even in negative profits.