• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.14 no.2 s.146
• /
• pp.37-49
• /
• 2004

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 1999.10a
• /
• pp.187-187
• /
• 1999

• 주류공업
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 1987

• KOREAN POULTRY JOURNAL
• /
• v.56 no.6
• /
• pp.142-145
• /
• 2024

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.341-342
• /
• 2016

제조 산업에서 키워드로 많이 다뤄지는 4M데이터(man, method, machine, martial)는 생산에 효율성을 높이기 위한 중요한 요소이다. 규모가 작은 기업일수록 4M관련 데이터 관리가 잘 안되고 있다. 관리를 잘하는 기업이라도 수집하고 저장만 하고 있는 현실이다. 본 논문에서는 수집하고 저장되어 있는 4M데이터를 활용해 생산한 상품에 대한 생산당시 상황을 추적할 수 있는 시스템을 제안한다. 제안한 시스템을 이용해 생산라인의 상황을 한 눈에 파악이 가능하고 주로 문제가 발생하는 공정과 관련 요인 파악을 통해 불량률을 줄이는 연구를 할 수 있다.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.31 no.1
• /
• pp.105-148
• /
• 2023

This paper provides a new method of measuring the degree of technological progress which contributes to real economic growth based on Schumpeter's Trilogy. Using Microdata of Statistics Korea, the results of measuring and comparing the actual growth contribution of technological progress during the period 2003-2018 by the total factor productivity growth rate(growth accounting method), the R&D investment contribution rate, and the Schumpeterian innovation growth rate, respectively are as follows. First, the measurement of the real growth contribution of technological progress by the growth rate of total factor productivity and the growth rate of Schumpeterian innovation shows contradictory results. Second, when the growth rate of production is in a decreasing trend, the difference between the growth rate of production and the growth rate of total factor productivity increases compared to when it is in an increasing trend. Conversely, when there is an increasing trend, the difference between the growth rate of production and the growth rate of total factor productivity becomes smaller compared to when it is in a decreasing trend.. Third, the technological opportunity that affects the innovation growth rate, i.e., the contribution of R&D incentives to innovative growth is only 3.3%. The reason why this result is different from the existing perception of the contribution of technological progress to growth is that different entities are being measured while measuring the same term of technological progress. Therefore, the growth rate of total factor productivity should be used to measure macroeconomic efficiency, R&D investment should be used to measure the effectiveness of new technology supply, and the Schumpeterian innovation rate should be used to measure the economic impact of technological progress. The policy implications of the research results of this thesis are as follows: ① Transition from a policy of one-sided technology supply to a policy of convergence of technology supply and new technology demand support, ② Mission-oriented R&D policy and R&D policy that links national R&D with private R&D, ③ Reclassification of capital goods reflecting the degree of new knowledge.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.277-298
• /
• 2012

Once a production focused on primary industry, Food, agriculture, forestry and fisheries industry is now trying to shed away and plans to totally transform the paradigm of agricultural R&D with a leaping goal towards being a new growth engine. Promoting the bioindustry through utilizing agricultural bioresources was selected as the primary task and also made all efforts to support by all government department and ministry. In this study, we are raised problems and planned the improvements by the empirical analysis of national R&D policy, investment strategy, the recent progress of R&D program, and the performance of R&D investment to achieve early commercialization in fields of agricultural bioresources utilizing. We also propose the R&D role sharing and cooperations of public/private sector to commercialize the agricultural bioresources from the comprehensive empirical analysis results. It will eventually strengthen the national R&D investment strategy and efficiency and then will contribute towards a successful early commercialization performance in bioindustry through utilizing agricultural bioresources.

• Journal of the Korean Professional Engineers Association
• /
• v.32 no.6
• /
• pp.40-43
• /
• 1999

The R&D productivity has the same meaning as that of general meaning. Its input includes budget, facility, schedule, idea and target, and its output includes patent, paper, technological innovation and revenue increase and technology accumulation influenced by these factors. The choice of R&D item which will have the large effectiveness after customization, resource input of proper level, application of efficient development schema, effective usage of development output, objective appraisal for the R&D output and extension for the future project are the main factors for which is suggested to enhance the R&D productivity. The management's expectation for R&D can be represented as the innovativeness of output and potential influence to outsiders. The speedy output, even if incremental investment more than planning happens, will eventually result in the productivity enhancement of the enterprise, and managers must not encounter the opportunity loss in return for the excessive investment control.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2015.05a
• /
• pp.395-396
• /
• 2015

최근 정보기술과 모바일 환경의 발전에 따라 서비스의 패러다임이 웹에서 앱 중심으로 다시 변화하고 있다. 또한 연구자의 R&D 생산성 제고를 위한 노력들이 중요하게 인식되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 연구자의 R&D활동을 지원하는 네트워크 기반 개인지식도구에 관한 서비스 모델을 제안한다. 네트워크 기반 개인지식도구는 국내외 과학기술정보 뿐만 아니라 연구자 개개인이 보유한 정보들도 융합하여 R&D활동 과정에서 쉽고 편리하게 활용할 수 있도록 도와줄 것이다. 또한 개인별 도구를 활용함으로써 보다 개인화된 정보서비스가 실현될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.10
• /
• pp.6066-6075
• /
• 2014

The aim of this study was to analyze the productivity changes in government-funded research institutes for Economics & Humanities and Social Sciences. From Malmquist total factor productivity index analysis, the average productivity decreased 6.5% between 2006 and 2010. Further analysis showed that technical efficiency increased 4.7% annually while the technology change rate decreased 10.8% on average. Under pressure for innovation from the outside, research institutes responded to managerial efficiency improvement, which lead to increases in technical efficiency. On the other hand, for productivity improvement of government funded research institutes, they must pursue technological advances by securing an outstanding research workforce, expanding the R&D budget, and changing the R&D method. Each institute must perceive the cause of an individual institute's productivity change, and establish strategies for increasing productivity.