• 한국의류산업학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.44-54
• /
• 2011

This study aims to clarify the asset evaluation attributes of imported brands exclusively by department stores based on qualitative study. For the qualitative research, hands-on staff of the branch office who had at least 5 years experience in PB-related positions at one of the four domestic department stores(Lotte, Shinsegae, Hyundai, Galleria), and at least 20 years old adults who had purchased imported brand items exclusively by a certain department store(Shinsegae, Lotte) were included. The asset evaluation attributes of department store-exclusively imported brands were drawn up through the one-to-one in-depth interview method. As a result of qualitative study on the asset evaluation attributes of department store-exclusive importation brands, it turned out that there were 4 factors in view of business entity - stability, profitability, growth potential, and relationship, and that there were 6 factors in view of consumers - product quality, recognition, country of origin, image, preference, and reliability. In comparison with the existing preliminary study, it was notable that relationship in view of business entity, and country of origin in view of consumers were added to the asset elements.

• Journal of Smart Tourism
• /
• 제3권4호
• /
• pp.17-21
• /
• 2023

This research note aims to provide a critical understanding of "tourist stupidity" and "exclusiveness" within the smart tourism domain and to propose a corresponding qualitative research agenda. It argues that qualitative research methodologies are too infrequently applied, leading to a paradox evident in smart tourism studies. Accordingly, it suggests that embracing a qualitative perspective is essential to diversify the scholarly discourse and promote advanced inquiry in the field of smart tourism. It further seeks to contribute to ongoing debates by focusing on umbrella terms, such as "tourist stupidity" and "exclusiveness," for a more nuanced and holistic understanding of smart tourism and proposes a research agenda that advocates a re-evaluation of qualitative approaches.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.189-207
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 2022년 전국 도서관 운영평가 중 공공도서관에 집중하여, 최근 변화 양상을 분석하고 향후 방향성을 논의하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 공공도서관 평가의 정성·정량평가 비율 변화 및 변화 전·후 평가 결과의 특성을 분석하였다. 우선 각 정성평가 및 정량평가의 비율 변화에 따른 과거와 현재의 평가 결과 비교 분석을 수행한 후, 도서관의 규모에 따른 그룹화에 대해 실효성을 논하고자 하였다. 더 나아가서는 각 평가점수에 대한 계산 방식의 변화 및 총점과의 상관계수 분석을 통한 새로운 정량평가 변수의 발견을 시도하였다. 이러한 과정을 통해 표준화 및 개별화를 적용한 변수의 계산 방식, 다양한 영역에 대한 비중의 균형화, 도서관들의 자발적인 평가 참여를 고무할 방안을 제안하였다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.255-275
• /
• 2015

본 연구의 목적은 질적 연구방법 교과목의 교육내용에 관한 기초자료를 제시하여 문헌정보학 대학원 과정의 질적 연구방법 교과목 개발에 일조하고자 한다. 국내 대학원에서 개설하고 있는 76편의 질적 연구방법 교과목 강의계획서의 내용분석을 통하여 질적 연구방법의 교육 경향을 도출하였다. 이를 근거로 문헌정보학 교육을 위한 핵심내용으로 질적 연구패러다임, 연구설계, 다양한 질적 연구 유형, 자료수집과 분석의 다양성, 글쓰기, 질적 연구의 평가준거를 제시하고 교수전략을 논하였다. 좋은 질적 연구를 수행하고 개발하기 위해서는 순환적, 창조적, 성찰적인 연구 실제가 가능하도록 교육해야 할 것이다. 이를 위해서는 질적 연구의 토대로서 질적 연구의 다양한 패러다임과 철학적 이론적 전통을 이해하는 것이 선행되어야 한다. 질적 연구자는 자신의 질적 입장(qualitative stance)을 인식하고 질적 연구를 행하는 것이 매우 중요하다.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.25-32
• /
• 2005

In evaluation of public works, its components related with benefit and cost in feasibility analysis can be classified to quantative and qualitative elements, To evaluate qualitative components which can not be calculated by numerical value, several methods are used to assess relative importance. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is representative method which can evaluate importance, but it has difficulties in organization of expert group, execution of question, and subjective decision of questioner. Information measure technique can be used to evaluate these qualitative importance of environmental and social components in public works planning. In result of comparing importances of AHP and information measure technique, it has statistical significance in of road project.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.420-430
• /
• 2007

It is reported that many users of the subways in Seoul are not currently satisfied with the subway services. The cause of the dissatisfaction is that the qualitative items and indexes are not considered properly, and also does not diversify the evaluation items to follow the change of subway environment. Therefore in this study the evaluation items and indexes that can reflect of the subway users' characteristics are examined and synthesized. Then the characteristics of service are analyzed for the senior subway system users and junior subway system users that are classified with the cluster analysis. The result of the study is that the majority of users on subway are not satisfied the qualitative items which are safety, kindness, comfortableness, convenience excepting for punctuality and accessibility. So, if the service of subway users improve, the qualitative items is needed to consider with quantitative items.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제22권52호
• /
• pp.311-322
• /
• 1999

Major problems involved in an electrical utility expansion planning within a time horizon are how to efficiently deal with objectives considering multiple factors and uncertainty. But justification factors in study these days have considered only quantitative factors except qualitative factors. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to develop a new model for economic evaluation of nuclear power plants through the scoring model with the quantitative and qualitative factors under uncertainty. The quantitative factors use a levelized generation cost method considering time value of money. Especially, the environmental, risk, and safety factors in this paper have been also explained for the rational economic justification of the qualitative factors under uncertainty. This paper not only proposes a new approach method using the scoring model in evaluating economy of the nuclear power plant in the long term, but also provides the more efficient decision making criterion for nuclear power plants under uncertainty.

• Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.369-381
• /
• 2017

The objective of this study was to compare the wood anatomical characteristics of local tree species in Moluccas, Indonesia i.e., Moluccan ironwood (Intsia bijuga), linggua (Pterocarpus indicus), red meranti (Shorea parvifolia), and gofasa (Vitex cofassus). Qualitative evaluation was conducted by observing the anatomical structure in cross, radial, and tangential sections of each sample. For the quantitative evaluation, the dimensions of vessels, rays, and fibers were measured. Qualitative evaluation showed that crystals were observed in Moluccan ironwood, linggua, and gofasa, while resin canals were only observed in red meranti. Tyloses were frequently observed in gofasa but infrequently observed in linggua and red meranti. Quantitative evaluation showed that Moluccan ironwood with the higher density had thicker fiber wall, higher quantity of ray number, and wider rays than the other species. Red meranti had higher values of ray height and fiber length than the other three species. The results also revealed that linggua showed the highest values of relative crystallinity and crystallite width. Red meranti and gofasa showed similar values of relative crystallinity and crystallite width, while Moluccan ironwood showed the lowest values. The basic qualitative and quantitative anatomical characteristics discussed could provide useful information for further utilizations of such wood species.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.136-144
• /
• 2011

콘크리트 구조물의 골조공사에서의 주요 공정 중 하나인 거푸집 공사는 전체 건축공사의 공사기간 및 공사비 측면에서 상당 부분을 차지하고 있다. 하지만 공사현장의 조건을 고려한 거푸집의 적정시스템 선정은 현재까지 현장실무자의 경험에만 의존하고 있는 실정이다. 본 논문에서는 거푸집 공법 선정 요인에 대한 정량화된 분석을 바탕으로 슬래브 거푸집 중 신공법과 기존 공법을 선정하여 각 공법의 성능을 정량화된 분석데이터를 바탕으로 평가했다. 이를 통하여 각 공법들의 정성적 항목에 대한 정량화된 평가점수를 산출하여 슬래브 거푸집의 현장 적용성에 대한 평가 방안을 제시하였다. 따라서 본 논문에서 사용된 델파이 기법의 방법론은 다른 공법들의 선정, 평가에도 사용될 것이라 사료된다.

• 기본간호학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.442-451
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze reports of qualitative research published in Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing (JKAFN). Methods: Twenty four qualitative research studies using in-depth interviews and focus group interviews published in JKAFN from 1994 to 2014 were selected for analysis. Chosen reports were analyzed by consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ), which is a reporting guideline for qualitative research. COREQ consists of 32 items and 3 domains. Results: In the 1st domain, the relationship of researchers and research participants, bias and understanding of the researchers on the study phenomenon were analyzed less than other items. In the 2nd domain, methodological research was carried out across various qualitative studies, but the description of the research environment and research questions for the interview guidelines was insufficient. In the 3rd domain, research results and data were consistent, but data showing opposing content and explanations of negative practices were not done at all. Conclusion: These results indicate a need for the development of evaluation tools for qualitative research and items should be added to improve the reliability and validity, research should be related to the ethics in the framework of the COREQ.