• Title/Summary/Keyword: Putting Trajectory

Search Result 14, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Kinematic Analysis of Elite Athletes in Men's Shot-Put at World Championships, Daegu 2011 (2011 대구세계육상선수권대회 남자 포환던지기 결선경기의 운동학적 분석)

  • Oh, Cheong-Hwan;Shin, Eui-Su;Choi, Su-Nam;Jeong, Ik-Su;Bae, Jae-Hee;Lee, Jeong-Tea;Park, Seung-Bum
    • Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics
    • /
    • v.21 no.5
    • /
    • pp.631-638
    • /
    • 2011
  • This study had two purposes. The first was to analyze the period of the final record set by the male shot-putters in the IAAF World Championships, Daegu 2011 from the point of view of kinematics. The other was to identify an efficient movement for shot putting based on the analysis. The research used the eight finalists of in the championship as subjects. We analyzed the seven most important kinematic factors in shot putting based on the type of technique: the execution time of the delivery phase, release velocity, release angle, release, center of mass (COM) velocity, and shot trajectories. The analytical results showed the following average figures for the record 12 meters: execution time of the delivery phase: (0.19 s), release height: (2.06 m), release angle: ($34.68^{\circ}$), release velocity: (13.25 m/s), angular velocity of shoulder: ($922.38^{\circ}/s$), and angular velocity of pelvis: ($479.50^{\circ}/s$). Further, the results showed that the highest COM velocity was 2.25 m/s and the shot trajectories were close to a straight line in the release phase.

Dynamic Walking Planning for a Legged Moving Machine (보행형 이동 로봇의 동적 걸음 계획)

  • Yu S.H.;Kim J.H.;Kim Y.B.
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering Conference
    • /
    • 2005.06a
    • /
    • pp.1780-1783
    • /
    • 2005
  • In this paper ZMP was considered in order to get a walking stability, so the gait in the stable domain was realized through putting the stability margin in the sole domain of a foot. It is assumed that the robot's legs have 12 joints to operate a open-loop drive and there was no external disturbance under walking phases, additionally, the robot is walking on the flat plane. It was observed that the robot's walking trajectory, locus of COM and ZMP after imposing the motion to each joint. For realizing the simulation considering ZMP and movement of mass center, it was checked if it is stable for the constraint robot model to walk in stability and the feasibility was estimated about its dynamic gait. Eventually it was shown that a constraint gait algorithm is able to realize. To verify the proper walking process, ZMP(Zero Moment Point) theory is applied and the simulation has been done by ADAMS.

  • PDF

A Study on the Optimal Design of Rifling Rate (강선율 최적설계에 관한 연구)

  • Cha, Ki-Up;Cha, Young-Hyun;Lee, Sung-Bae;Cho, Chang-Ki
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology
    • /
    • v.13 no.6
    • /
    • pp.998-1005
    • /
    • 2010
  • Rifling force has a torsion impulse effect on the gun tube and thus generates undesirable vibration of the gun tube about its bore axis, putting additional stress on the projectile. High rifling force at the muzzle of the gun tube may adversely influence the trajectory of the projectile. And, the service life of rifled gun barrels is known to depend on the rifling force. Rifling force along the path of the projectile in the longitudinal direction of the gun tube can be described with projectile mass, projectile velocity, gas pressure curve and rifling angle. Under the same conditions, the character of the rifling of the gun barrel decisively influences the rifling force curve. To reduce the above mentioned harmful effect, locally distinct maximum of rifling force has to be avoided and maximum rifling force needs to be minimized. The best way to minimize the maximum rifling force is to design a rifling angle function so that the rifling force curve has a near trapezoidal shape. In this paper a new approach to make the optimal rifling force curve is described. The rifling angle determining the rifling force is developed by combined Fourier series and polynomial function to satisfy both the convergence and boundary condition matching problems.

Kinematical Differences of the Male Professional Golfers' 30 Yard Chip Shot and Pitch Shot Motion (남자프로골퍼의 30 야드 칩샷과 피치샷 동작의 운동학적 차이)

  • Pyun, Eun-Kyung;Park, Young-Hoon;Youm, Chang-Hong;Sun, Sheng;Seo, Kuk-Woong;Seo, Kook-Eun
    • Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics
    • /
    • v.17 no.2
    • /
    • pp.177-185
    • /
    • 2007
  • Even though there were no clear definitions of the short game and short game distance, short game capability is crucial for a good golf score. Generally, chip shot and pitch shot are regarded as two principal components of the short game. Chip shot is a short, low trajectory shot played to the green or from trouble back into play. Pitch shot is a high trajectory shot of short length. Biomechanical studies were conducted usually to analyze full swing and putting motions. The purpose of the study was to reveal the kinematical differences between professional golfers' 30 yard $53^{\circ}wedge$ chip shot and $56^{\circ}wedge$ pitch shot motions. Fifteen male professional golfers were recruited for the study. Kinematical data were collected by the 60 Hz three-dimensional motion analysis system. Statistical comparisons were made by paired t-test, ANOVA, and Duncan of the SPSS 12.0K with the $\alpha$ value of .05. Results show that both the left hand and the ball were placed left of the center of the left and right foot at address. The left hand position of the chip shot was significantly left side of that of the pitch shot. But the ball position of the pitch shot was significantly right side of that of the chip shot. All body segments aligned to the left of the target line, open, at address. Except shoulder, there were no significant pelvis, knee, and feet alignment differences between chip shot and pitch shot. These differences at address seem for the ball height control. Pitch shot swing motions(the shoulder and pelvis rotation and the club head travel distance) were significantly bigger than those of the chip shot. Club head velocity of the pitch shot was significantly faster than that of the chip shot at the moment of impact. This was for the same shot length control with different lofted clubs. Swing motion differences seem mainly caused by the same shot length control with different ball height control.