• 제목/요약/키워드: Psychological-emotional indicators

검색결과 12건 처리시간 0.016초

대학생의 MBTI 성격유형에 따른 원예선호도에 관한 연구 (Study on the Preferences of Horticulture According to MBTI Personality Type in College Students)

  • 정선희;허무룡
    • 농업생명과학연구
    • /
    • 제45권6호
    • /
    • pp.65-72
    • /
    • 2011
  • ENFP의 66.7%가 꽃을 INFP의 50%가 잎을 가장 먼저 관심을 보인다고 하였다. ISTP는 55.6%가 식물의 향기에 가장 먼저 흥미를 느끼며, ENTJ의 60%, INFJ의 7%, INTJ의 83.3%가 식물전체의 형태에 가장 먼저 관심을 가진다고 하였다. MBTI성격유형에 따라 식물의 관심부분에 대한 선택이 다르다고 할 수 있다(p=0.004). 좋아하는 식물 종류는 꽃 53.7%, 과일 32.7%, 채소 5.4%를 선택하였고, 심리기능에 따라 좋아하는 식물종류가 다르며(p=0.022), 화훼류의 특성에 따른 4가지 식물 중 꽃이 있는 식물은 NF 40.7%, NT 58.8%가 선호하였으며, SF는 향이 있는 식물을 41.8%가 선호하였다. ST는 37.5%가 꽃이 있는 식물, 29.2%가 사계절 푸른 잎이 있는 관엽식물을 선호하였다. 심리적 기능에 따라 가장 마음에 드는 식물군에 대한 선택도 다르다고 할 수 있다(p=0.038). MBTI 성격유형의 네 가지 지표에 따른 잎과 꽃의 형태 선호에 대한 분석결과 판단기능인 사고형과 감정형에 따라 잎 형태의 선택이 다른 것을 의미하고(p=0.036), 판단형과 인식형에 따라 꽃 형태 선택이 다르다고 할 수 있다(p=0.025).

뇌교육 기반 운동 및 KPEM도수치료 통합 프로그램이 암환자의 수면과 삶의 질에 미치는 영향 (The effect of brain education-based exercise and KPEM manual therapy integrated program on sleep and quality of life in cancer patients)

  • 김병관;성민규;양현정
    • 대한물리치료과학회지
    • /
    • 제30권1호
    • /
    • pp.10-22
    • /
    • 2023
  • Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of brain education-based exercise and KPEM manual therapy integrated program on the sleep and quality of life of cancer patients. Design: Seventy subjects who were diagnosed with cancer and were undergoing treatment volunteered to participate in this study. All subjects used a nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design for either the experimental group or the control group. In the final analysis, there were 25 subjects in the experimental group and 18 subjects in the control group. Methods: For 12 weeks, the experimental group performed brain education-based exercise (20 minutes) and KPEM manual therapy (50 minutes), and the control group performed basic physical therapy and autonomous exercise. For evaluation, the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-K) and the quality of life index were measured after intervention using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC-3.0Ver). Effect between groups, time effect over time, and group*time interaction were analyzed through a pre-test before and after the 12-week intervention period, and repeated measure ANOVA after 12 weeks of the integrated program intervention. All statistical significance levels were set at α=.05. Results: The PSQI in the time effect (p=.001) and the group*time interaction (p<.001) were statistically significant. In terms of EORTC, QL2 and PF2 were significant in time effect (p=.024; p=.021) and group*time interaction (p=.007; p=.021), whereas in RF2, significance was only found in group*time interaction (p=.028). In symptom indicators, time effect was the only significant factor in FA, SL, AP, and CO, respectively (p=.002; p=.028; p=.041; p =.005) and in DY, there were significant differences in the time effect (p=.016) and group*time interaction (p=.002). Conclusion: The brain education-based exercise and KPEM manual therapy integrated program effectively improves the sleep and quality of life of cancer patients. It is considered that this exercise and therapy can be actively used as a psychological, emotional, and physically complementary physical therapy intervention to improve the quality of life of cancer patients.