• Title/Summary/Keyword: Psychoacoustical parameter

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Objectively Quantified Consonance of Complex Sounds (객관적으로 정량화된 복합 신호음의 조화도)

  • Chon, Sang-Bae;Choi, In-Yong;Lee, Min-Gu;Sung, Koeng-Mo
    • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.26 no.7
    • /
    • pp.323-327
    • /
    • 2007
  • In this paper, objectively quantified consonance of complex sound is proposed as a new psychoacoustical parameter. Proposing algorithm quantifies consonance of complex sound after applying psycho acoustical models which are parts of human perception such as masking effect, equal loudness contour, and critical band. To verify proposing algorithm, experiments with 10 car horn signals which have different complex sound were performed. The experiments show cross correlation of 0.95 between objectively quantified consonance by proposing algorithm and subjectively assessed consonance by listening tests. Considering the fact that there are few psychoacoustical parameter except Zwicker parameter, proposing algorithm will help to quantify psychoacoustical effect of complex sounds objectively.

Experimental Study on Subjective Evaluation of Car Interior Sound Quality (승용차 내부소음의 음질평가 실험연구)

  • 최병호;아우구스트쉬크
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
    • /
    • 2003.11a
    • /
    • pp.177-182
    • /
    • 2003
  • This study is directed toward determining the number and characteristics of psychologically meaningful perceptual dimensions required for assessing the sound Ouaiity with respect to vehicle interior and/or exterior noises. and toward identifying the acoustical or psychoacoustical bases underlying the perception. By nonmetric MDS and clustring analysis of sound quality data sets on our own, of critical importance are two perceptual dimensions for which subjective verdicts can be interpreted as loudness and sharpness. The perceptual dimensions based upon similarity judgments could be accounted for 48% and 24% of the variance. each of which might be a match for the acoustic parameter "A-weighted maximum pressure level"(r= .85) and for the psychoacoustic parameter "sharpness" (r= .65), respectively. On the other hand, the perceptual dimensions based upon preference ratings could explain 66% and 10% of the variance. where the acoustic parameter "A-weighted maximum pressure leve"(r= .92) might be taken to be a best predictor, but sharpness appeared to be less suitable for the description of Preference behavior. Linked to the results, the problems of quantitative modelling of subjective sound quality evaluation and also of implementing corresponding cognitive combination rule for technical and industrial applications, say having "winner-sound qualify" according to preference criteria will be shortly in discussion.

  • PDF

Just noticeable difference of autocorrelation function (ACF) parameters of refrigerator noise (냉장고 소음 ACF 요소의 최소인지한계량 조사)

  • You, Jin;Jeong, Choong-Il;Jeon, Jin-Yong;Cho, Moon-Jae
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
    • /
    • 2007.11a
    • /
    • pp.1442-1445
    • /
    • 2007
  • Just noticeable differences (jnds) of autocorrelation function (ACF) parameters - Phi (0), Tau 1 and Phi 1 - of household refrigerator noise were investigated by psychoacoustical analyses. Phi (0) of five refrigerators' noise was changed with equal (${\pm}$) interval level of 0.5-1.0 dB up to five intervals by manipulating sound pressure level of the noise. Tau 1 and Phi 1 were varied with equal (${\pm}$) interval of around 0.10 ms and 0.02, respectively. Pitch shifting and strengthen methods were applied for the Tau 1 and Phi 1 variations. As results of subjective evaluations, about 2.0 dB was shown as jnd of Phi (0). The values of 0.30 ms and 0.06 were found as jnds of Tau 1 and Phi 1, respectively. The jnd results of each ACF parameter can be applied to explain substantial amount of sound quality (SQ) enhancement in the SQ prediction indices which were proposed in the authors' previous study [Sato et al. (2007) J. Acoust. Soc. Am.].

  • PDF