• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control Conference
• /
• 2003.04a
• /
• pp.203-206
• /
• 2003

우리나라 시설원예 면적은 '95년 43,093ha에서 '01년 말 현재 52,125ha로 연평균 3.2%의 증가율을 보인 반면 난방면적은 연평균 10.8%씩 증가하여 12,710ha로 전체 시설재배 면적의 24.4%를 차지하고 있다. 또한 난방연료의 95% 이상이 경유이며, 최근 국제정세 불안 등으로 유가가 급등하여 시설재배농가의 연료비 부담은 더욱 가중되고 있다. (중략)

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control Conference
• /
• 2003.04a
• /
• pp.199-202
• /
• 2003

우리나라 전체 시설원예 면적 52,135ha(2001년) 중 난방을 하고 있는 시설원예 면적은 12,710ha로서 약 24%정도를 차지하고 있다. 시설재배면적의 지역분포를 비교해 보면, 시설채소의 경우 중부 이북지역에 44%, 남부에 56%의 비율로 분포해 있으며, 시설화훼의 경우 중부 이북 58%, 남부 42%로서 난방비가 많이 소요되는 지역이라도 수도권을 중심으로 유통이나 지리적 면에서 유리한 지역에 시설재배면적이 많이 분포해 있다. (중략)

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control Conference
• /
• 2007.05a
• /
• pp.127-130
• /
• 2007

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.10-14
• /
• 2004

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.86-89
• /
• 2004

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.62-66
• /
• 2004

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control Conference
• /
• 2003.10a
• /
• pp.187-191
• /
• 2003

• Journal of Bio-Environment Control
• /
• v.32 no.1
• /
• pp.87-87
• /
• 2023

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.29 no.3
• /
• pp.270-280
• /
• 2023

The creation of marine protected areas is an important aspect of marine ecosystem sustainability. However, South Korea has not achieved its Aichi Biodiversity Target to designate 10% of its sea as marine protected by 2020. Local residents have strong opposition to the designation of protected areas in South Korea; there has been little trust in the government since the 1970s, when residents felt that their property rights were being ignored in favor of creating national parks. Here, we present a case where creation of a marine protected area was led by residents of TongYeong City. The success of a participation income project to remove marine debris in the city seems to be an important factor that led to the designation of the marine protected area. The case of TongYeong City is compared with that of nearby Geoje City, where an ecologically important stream has not been designated as a wetland protection area, although a similar participation income project enrolled the city's residents. The comparison provides a tentative assessment of the conditions needed to increase trust among residents. The results suggest that, if the projects are well-designed and well-managed, participation income projects to remove marine debris can be effective in building trust among stakeholders in potential marine protected areas.

• Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
• /
• v.34 no.5
• /
• pp.436-445
• /
• 2020

The number of protected areas has been steadily increased in Korea to achieve Aichi Target 11, and there are studies on potential protected areas that required additional designation. However, there has been an insufficient assessment of the complementarity of protected areas to conserve biodiversity effectively. This study identified the potential habitat areas using the species distribution model for plant species from the 3rd National Ecosystem Survey and compared the plant species abundance in the existing protected area and the potential protected areas using the similarity indices, such as the Jaccard index, Sorenson index, and Bray-Curtis index. As a result, we found that the complementarity of the existing protected areas and most potential protected areas were low, leading to the preservation of similar plant species. Only the buffer zone for Korea National Arboretum had high complementarity and thus is important to conserve some species with the other protected areas. This study confirmed that it was necessary to select additional protected areas outside the existing or potential protected areas to protect plant species with a low inclusion ratio of potential habitats within the protected area. This study is significant because it identified the ecological representativeness of each protected area to examine if the individual protected area can conserve unique and various species and proposed a method of finding candidate areas for additional conservation spatially. The findings of this study can be a valuable reference for the qualitative improvement of protected areas through the complementarity assessments, including animals and the effectiveness assessment study of protected areas using the National Ecosystem Survey data in the future.