• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제17권31호
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 1994

Sequentiality in decision making is an inherent characteristic of the R&D Process, Conceptual changes are noted during the Course of the Project which represent a continuous improvement in the quality of the data available during the various project stages. In this paper, Eight characteristic types of project evaluation models have been developed economic index models, portfolio models, decision theory models, risk analysis models, frontier models, scoring models, profile models and checklists. Each of these will be critically reviewed and appraised.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제13권8호
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 2015

최근에 소프트웨어(SW) 융복합 시대를 맞아 SW품질관리의 중요성에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 품질관리전담기관의 SW품질활동관리 적정성을 객관적으로 평가 할 수 있는 방안에 대하여 기존의 품질 활동관리 적정성 사례를 기반으로 새로운 적정성 평가 방안을 제안하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 다음과 같이 연구 목적을 세 가지로 설정한다. 첫째, 기존의 국가 SW R&D 프로젝트의 SW품질활동관리 적정성 평가의 문제점을 도출하고 분석한다. 둘째, 기존의 SW품질활동관리 적정성 평가에 대한 문제점을 극복할 수 있는 새로운 적정성 평가 방법을 제안한다. 셋째, 새로운 적정성 평가 방법을 WBS(World Best Software) 프로젝트를 대상으로 적용해서 그 가능성과 효과성에 대하여 살펴본다. 본 연구에서 새롭게 제시한 국가 SW R&D 품질활동관리 적정성 평가 프레임워크를 대형 SW R&D 프로젝트인 WBS 프로젝트의 2개 과제에 실질적으로 적용해봄으로써 새로운 품질활동관리 적정성 평가 프레임워크의 효과성과 실무 적용 가능성을 입증하였다.

• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.158-175
• /
• 2000

Up to date, the economic feasibility analysis on land consolidation and on-farm development projects were mainly depended upon the direct benefits from market value of project outputs. Therefore the projects were neglected in allocation of the government's financial funds and loans on account of undervaluation of the project benefits including socio-economic and environmental values of the projects. Accordingly the Extended Benefit Cost Analysis Method should be adapted to cover not only the benefits such as non-market values of environmental functions of the projects and but also the economic market values of the project outputs. The main objectives of this study is (1) to provision of the guideline for economic feasibility analysis based on the IBRD and ADB guidelines, (2) to estimate the benefits such as Productivity increase effect, labor saving effect, off-farm income increase effect during off-farm season, saving of O&M cost of farm mechanization, enhance of farmer's public health, increase of environmental public function of paddy fields, effect of food security and establishment of peaceful and uncontroversial rural society by implementing the land consolidation and on-farm development, (3) to introduce the newly adapted analytical method as the extended benefit cost analysis which could make possible the analysis of non-market goods such as the food security value and the environmental public value of paddy fields. To carry out the study, the publication on the guideline for economic analysis of agricultural projects were reviewed and consulted and for the post evaluation of the land consolidation and on-farm development project, field survey in Jeongja area were made for the feasibility study of the project by new method. According to the initial project plan, Jeongja land consolidation and on-farm development project has 96ha of benefit area and the project was started in 1989 and completed in the spring, 1990. The total project costs were amounted to 1,052 million won and the annual project benefits were estimated at 135.4 million in 1989 constant market prices. On the other hand, the newly estimated project benefits as a part of post evaluation of the project were amounted to 602.1 million won including all the benefits from the market and non-market commodities of the project as mentioned above column. The original IRP(Internal rate of return) of the project was estimated at 15.81%. On the other hand, the IRR of the post evaluation of the project was amounted to 16.83%. In case of including the benefit from the environment public function of paddy field, the SRR(Social Rate of Return) was reached to 38.81% and when we added the benefit from food security of the project, the SRR showed very high rate as 46.41%. In conclusion, the project were verified socio-economically feasible and environmentally sustainable considering the above decision making criteria.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 2003년도 춘계공동학술대회
• /
• pp.972-975
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to integrate Decision Theory Approach(DTA) and OR Theory Approach(OTA) systemically. and to develop Combination Theory Approach to build an optimal R&D project portfolio by strategies. To Integrate two approaches. Utility theory is introduced. Evaluation Results aye converted into utility values by the utility functions and the values are optimized by 0-1 programming. Scoring method and Integer programming is used to evaluation a correspondence with a goal and to allocation the limiting resources. And utility function is used to reflect the preference of decision makers on the project evaluation.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제20권11호
• /
• pp.163-168
• /
• 2015

Various methods have been used to solve the problem of the evaluation of the complex decision-making. In the case of public projects, used the AHP method to evaluate the pre-feasibility of the projects. In this paper, The pre-feasibility was referring to the 'General guidelines for the pre-feasibility' of the KDI and was used the AHP to evaluate for public projects of the H-city. In order to achieve this object, the structured hierarchical model and questionnaire developed based on the evaluation guidelines of the KDI. Also, the weight of evaluation factor was calculated based on the AHP method and was obtained the evaluation results for the project implementation alternative.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2008년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.1697-1702
• /
• 2008

The objective of the review is to introduce the evaluation method of welding joint designs by using forces extracted from FE models. This evaluation method is currently being used for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) project in the United States by request of the customer Engineer. The evaluation method was applied to critical joints connected by Fillet or Partial Joint Penetration (PJP) welds in car body structure for SEPTA project. The additional manual analysis is required based on the fact that Technical Specification in the United States requires the Contractor to apply Complete Joint Penetration (CJP) welds to all structural connections in Car body. However, in the car body design for Septa project there are some areas where CJP welds are not applied due to structural and manufacturing problems.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.3-11
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to verity the effect of project method on the task performance ability in development of a solar-tracking-control-system of specialized high school. In order to carry out this study, 2 classes of technical high school in Jeonbuk are chosen as experimental and control groups. The experimental group was taught by project method and the control group was taught by traditional instruction. Project method was designed by 4 stages-selection of goal, planning, implementation and evaluation. According to these stages, experimental group's students carried out the project that developing solar tracking control system in solar generation. The results of this study are as follows; the project method was more effective than the traditional instruction in planning ability for task performance and implementation ability, subordinates of task performance ability. However, information gathering ability and evaluation ability on task performance, others in subordinates, it is not clear that the project method is more effective.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.21-31
• /
• 2011

국토해양부는 공공 건설사업의 효율화를 유도 하기위한 목적으로 건설공사 사후평가 시행지침을 2001년 05월 10일 건관 58824-318호로 제정 공포하고 이후 지금까지 5차례에 걸쳐 개정 하였다. 이 지침의 관련근거는 건설기술 관리법 시행령 제38조 18항이며, 주요내용은 사업의 당초 입안 기획에서부터 실제 공사수행 완료에 이르기 까지 전 과정에 대하여 수행성과, 효율, 파급효과 등에 관한 평가를 준공 후 실시하고 그 결과를 데이터베이스화 하는 것이다. 지침의 적용범위는 SOC사업 및 상당한 규모의 토목공사를 대상으로 하였으나, 최근 개정된 지침인 국토해양부 고시 제2010-14호(2010년 01월 15일)에서 건축분야를 추가 하였다. 그러나 개정된 내용도 평가항목의 성격이 포괄적이거나 정량적 평가기준으로는 미흡함이 많아 실제 평가결과를 차후 활용할 수 있는 방향제시의 분명함이 부족하고, 또한 평가과정에서 절대평가를 수행하기에도 어려움이 따른다. 따라서 본 연구는 공공 건축공사 사후평가 과정에 필요한 평가항목의 개선에 집중 하였다. 개선의 방향은 평가항목을 관련 전문가들에게 설문조사를 통하여 변별력 증대에 기여할 수 있도록 조정하며, 또한 현실적으로 점수화 할 수 있는 항목임에도 기준이 모호한 것은 향상된 평가지표를 제시 하고자 한다. 이를 통해 사후평가 지침의 목적인 추후 유사한 프로젝트에 활용하는 기능을 더욱 향상 시킬 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.117-124
• /
• 1998

Corporations are pursuing maximum returns from their R&D investment. They are also interested in sound measures to quantify returns. In fact, they use various measures and criteria for measuring returns from the R&D investment. But the fundamental problem is that there is no generic and widely acceptable measures and criteria. To make things more complicated, measures are very powerful and influential to the people in the corporations. Herbert Simon already indicated that people do many things but people usually do their best for the only tasks which are measured. Many researchers, like Chester(1995), are interested in R&D productivity measures and risks because what the company measures really influence R&D people and output. This article present design concepts of the R&D project selection and evaluation system in POSCO(Pohang Iron & Steel Company). This is an output extract from the 6-month joint activities with POSRI(POSCO Research Institute) researchers and POSCO R&D personnel. Process changes, new organizations and new selection and evaluation criteria are developed to improve R&D performance and to enhance technology management of the POSCO. This article covers new selection and evaluation criteria only. We would like to share our experience about how we redesign the selection and evaluation of R&D projects. We also bring insights how we seamlessly integrate 4 different project selection and evaluation steps as a whole. We hope that this case will give you a clue to improve your R&D management.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권12호
• /
• pp.3645-3652
• /
• 2009

프로젝트식 교과과정인 협동프로젝트가 성공적으로 운영되기 위한 가장 중요한 요소는 체제적이고 합리적인 평가라 할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 단순한 결과 지향적인 평가를 벗어나 학습자에게 스스로 문제점에 대해 진단하고 개선할 수 있는 다차원 수행평가지원 시스템을 설계 및 구현한다. 이 시스템은 협동프로젝트를 이수하는 모든 과정을 평가함으로써 평가자와 피평가자 모두 평가 결과에 대해 만족할 수 있도록 구성하였다.