• 한국지리정보학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.39-50
• /
• 2019

2012년부터 "지적재조사에 관한 특별법"이 시행됨에 따라 우리나라의 지적재조사사업이 본격적으로 추진되고 있으나 사업예산 확보의 어려움과 도심지역을 중심으로 필지면적 증감에 따른 토지경계 설정 및 조정금 산정, 사업 주체와 토지 소유자 또는 경계를 이웃한 토지소유자 등 이해당사자 간의 의견 대립의 문제가 발생하고 있다. 따라서 이 연구에서는 우리나라보다 앞서 지적재조사를 추진하고 있는 일본의 관민경계제도의 분석을 통해 지적재조사 사업에 있어 경계설정 등 합의사항 추진 시 복잡한 이해관계를 한번에 결정하려하지 말고 이해관계자 대상을 줄여 단계적으로 추진할 필요가 있다. 또한 관민경계 선행조사를 통한 지적재조사의 비용절감 방안도입이 필요함에 따라 MMS를 이용한 정밀도로지도 구축사업등과의 연계, 지적재조사를 위한 선행조사사업 등의 도입, 관민경계기본조사 정보의 중요도와 국토조사정보로의 활용적 가치를 고려하여 도시재생, 도시계획업무 등과 연계추진이라는 방향을 제시하였다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.459-488
• /
• 2004

General interest in the out-of-court dispute resolution system are mounting in Korea, and the spread of ADR(alternative dispute resolution) is the worldwide trend. In addition, it was confirmed that the resolution of disputes by ADR such as the decision based on arbitration made by the Prime Ministerial Administrative Decision Committee is no longer in exclusive possession of the civil case. The activation of ADR could lead to the smooth agreement between parties by getting away from the once-for-all mode of decision such as the dismissal of the application or the cancellation of disposal and the like in relation to administrative cases for the years. In consequence, it is anticipated that the administrative litigation that applicants have filed by not responding to the administrative decision would greatly reduce in the future. But, it would be urgent to provide for the legal ground of the ADR system through the revision of related laws to take root in our society because ADR has no legal binding power relating to the administrative case due to the absence of its legal grounds. The fundamental reason for having hesitated to introduce ADR in relation to the administrative case for the years is the protective interest of the third party as well as the public interest that would follow in case the agreement on the dispute resolution between parties brings the dispute to a termination in the domain of the public law. The disputes related to the contract based on the public law and the like that take on a judicial character as the administrative act have been settled within the province of ADR by applying the current laws such as the Civil Arbitration Law, Mediation Law, but their application to the administrative act of the administrative agency that takes on a character of the public law has been hesitated. But as discussed earlier, there are laws and regulations that has the obscure distinction between public and private laws. But there is no significant advantage in relation to the distinction between public and private laws. To supplement and cure these defects it is necessary to include the institutional arrangement for protection of the rights and benefits of the third party, for example the provision of the imposition of the binding power on the result of ADR between parties, in enacting its related law. It can be said that the right reorganization of the out-of-court dispute resolution system in relation to the administrative case corresponds with the ideology of public administration for cooperaton in the Administrative Law. It is high time to discuss within what realm the out-of-court dispute resolution system, alternative dispute resolution system, can be accepted and what binding power is imposed on its result, not whether it is entirely introduced into the administrative case. It is thought that the current Civil Mediation Law or Arbitration Law provides the possibility of applying arbitration or mediation only to the civil case, thereby opening the possibility of arbitration in the field of the intellectual property right law. For instance, the act of the state is not required in establishing the rights related to the secret of business or copyrights. Nevertheless, the disputes arising from or in connection with the intellectual property rights law is seen as the administrative case, and they are excluded from the object of arbitration or mediation, which is thought to be improper. This is not an argument for unconditionally importing ADR into the resolution of administrative cases. Most of the Korean people are aware that the administrative litigation system is of paramount importance as the legal relief for administrative cases. Seeing that there is an independent administrative decision system based on the Administrative Decision Law other than administrative litigation in relation to administrative cases, the first and foremost task is the necessity for the shift in thinking of people, followed by consideration of the plan for relief of the rights through the improvement of the administrative decision system. Then, it is necessary to formulate the plan for the formal introduction and activation of ADR. In this process, energetic efforts should be devoted to introducing diverse forms of ADR procedures such as settlement conference, case evaluation, mini-trial, summary jury trial, early neutral evaluation adopted in the US as the method of dispute resolution other than compromise, conciliation, arbitration and mediation

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.147-153
• /
• 2017

The main subject of year 2016 Davos forum was "The 4th Industrial Revolution." Recently, interests and investment in drone market, so called industrial revolution in the sky is growing in many countries around the world. Before, drone was used for military purpose such as reconnaissance or attacking but today, it is used in various private sectors such as unmanned delivery service, agriculture, leisure activities, etc. Presently, many major countries in the world are already involved in the 'war without gunfire' to be dominant in this drone industry. Korean government also has announced an extreme relaxation of regulations for growing drone industry by opening a conference with Ministers related to economics. During the conference, business scope of drone which was limited to agriculture, photographing, and observation was expanded to all the fields except for cases hindering national safety and security. In terms of shooting purpose drone its process of receiving approval for flight and shooting is simplified to online registration. What is more, drone delivery service will be allowed in island areas such as Goheung, Yeongwol, etc from first term of year 2017. Finding the way to apply drone in criminal investigation is also speeding up. Recently, Public Safety Policy Research Center in Korean National Police University has inquired for research service and its result will be out around November. Likewise, although more and stronger foundation for supporting drone industry is made but there are still, some opinions saying that we should take a careful approach in consideration to the side effect such as abuse in crime. One may also try terror by placing a dangerous substance. If drone falls, it may hurt any civilians. Moreover, if shopping purpose drone is hacked, it may result in violation of privacy. Compared to America, Europe, and China, we are at the very beginning stage of drone industry and it is necessary to reorganize legal issues to grow this industry. This can be thought from two perspectives; first, the growth of drone industry is blocked by difficult regulations on Aviation Law and Radio Regulation Law. The second issue is the safety and privacy that are required for operating drone. For the advanced technologies to make human life more profitable, more active and proactive actions are required by criminal law side. In preparation to the second mechanical era where man and machines should go together, I hope that responsible preparation is required in all fields including the criminal law.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.77-94
• /
• 2015

정보를 공유하는데 중요한 매체로 인터넷이 활용되면서, 사용자들은 온라인 공간에서 자신의 정보를 포함한 수많은 정보를 생산하고 공유하고 있다. 온라인 상에서 개인정보를 공유하면서 사회적인 관계의 강도를 강화시키는 등 여러 이점이 있다. 하지만 이면에는 이렇게 공유된 정보가 오용되는 경우 개인정보 침해라는 부정적인 결과를 낳기도 한다. 비록 많은 기업과 정부가 개인정보보호를 위한 노력을 하고 있지만, 기술의 발전으로 인해 개인정보를 이용해 사이버 범죄나 해킹이 되는 경우를 완벽히 방어하기 어려운 것이 현실이다. 개인정보보호는 기업과 정부의 역할의 관점에서 연구가 진행되고 있지만, 사용자의 개인 관점에서 개인정보보호 행동에 대한 연구는 미약하며 이에 대한 연구의 필요성을 가진다. 본 연구는 인터넷 사용자의 개인정보보호 행동과 온라인의 환경적 요인간의 영향 관계를 밝히는 것이 목적이다. 특히, 본 연구에서는 사용자 개인이 자신의 정보를 보호를 위한 정보보호 기술을 수용 행동에 초점을 맞춘다. 본 연구 결과에 따르면, 온라인 상의 사용자가 개인정보보호를 위한 행동은 정부의 개인정보보호 법률과 정 방향의 영향 관계를 가진다. 또한 만약 사용자가 온라인 서비스를 이용할 때 익명을 사용하는 경우 사용자는 개인정보보호를 위한 행동에 정 방향의 영향 관계를 가진다. 더 자세한 결과와 공헌도는 본 논문에 기술하였다.