• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제52권
• /
• pp.223-251
• /
• 2018

이 글은 한국과 일본의 문학사 기술에서 '전후'라는 개념을 어떻게 다루고 있는지 비교 고찰한 것이다. 일본문학사에서 '전후'는 제2차 세계대전(아시아태평양전쟁)종결 이후를 의미하는 반면, 한국문학사에서는 주로 '한국전쟁 이후'를 가리킨다. 서로 다른 전쟁 이후를 가리키면서도 양국에서는 동일하게 '전후'라는 용어를 사용한 탓에 '전후'에 관한 이해에서 혼선이 빚어졌고, 특히 한국전쟁을 기점으로 하여 양국에서는 완전히 상반된 전후를 상상하고 있었다. 다시 말해 한국전쟁은 한국문학에서는 전후의 출발을 의미했지만 일본문학에서는 전후의 종언을 알리는 분기점이 되어 매우 대비적인 효과를 초래했던 것이다. 그러나 양국이 전경화시킨 '전후'란 각국의 서사 전략 혹은 담론의 정치와 밀접하게 결부되어 있는 것으로, 양국이 '전후' 담론을 통해 달성하려 했던 과제가 무엇이었는지 점검해 보면 서로 다른 두 '전후'의 이데올로기의 허구성은 당장에 노정된다. '전후'에 내재된 이데올로기의 해체는 일국사, 일국 문학사에서 '전후'를 해방시킬 수 있을 때 비로소 가능해질 수 있을 것이며 한일문학사에서의 '전후' 인식 비교와 교호 가능성 탐색도 그러한 작업의 일단이라 볼 수 있을 것이다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.125-138
• /
• 2018

During the 1950s, the North Koreans rebuilt their capital-Pyongyang-as a modern city under the principle of Soviet urban design. One North Korean architect, Kim Jung-hee, has been widely credited since the late 1980s as the master architect of the General Plan of the city's reconstruction. While Kim Jung-hee played a crucial role in its reconstruction, his heroic image as the founding architect of Pyongyang is considerably attributed to North Korea's mythical narratives rather than his historical activities. This paper argues that Pyongyang's postwar urban design was not a work made by a single actor, Kim Jung-hee; rather, it was a long-term collaborative project in which a team of North Korean architects and Soviet technical advisors took their respective roles. Beginning in the late 1980s, North Korea, which had been struggling with economic decline and an increasing sense of lagging behind in its rivalry with its Southern counterpart, used heroic narratives during the 1950s' postwar reconstruction period as an important propaganda tool for their regime. In this mythical narrative of Pyongyang's reconstruction, massive economic and technical aid from other communist countries has often disappeared, and the memory of the architects who contributed greatly to the reconstruction but later purged in North Korea have also completely vanished. Kim Jung-hee, meanwhile, remained in this epic as the founding architect who rebuilt the city in faithful accordance with the leadership of Kim Il Sung.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.115-126
• /
• 2019

Construction of the Pyongyang Railroad Station began in 1907 as an important foothold for the Japanese colonization of the Korean Peninsula and the further invasion of Manchuria. As Pyongyang gradually grew in size and political significance, the Pyongyang Station came to have two responsibilities: Fulfill its functional role and serve as a monument to the growing dignity of the city. This study argues that the Pyongyang Station, newly rebuilt in 1958, was the first building to solve the demands for both functional expansion and the pursuit of monumentality. Stylistically, the original single-story wooden building became a three-story classical masonry building. The stylistic change symbolizes the political shift by which the building was reconstructed. The simple wooden building built by the Japanese, representing Pyongyang's status as a colonial provincial town, was transformed into an imposing gateway for the capital city of a newly born socialist state. Socialist Realism, correctly described by its slogan "socialist in content and national in form," harmoniously blended classical architecture, socialist symbols, and Korean local motifs. This study is significant in that it illustrates the historical changes and continuity of the Pyongyang Station from 1907, when it was first built, through the "liberated space" to the postwar reconstruction period of the 1950s.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.137-144
• /
• 2008

Public housing problem became a major issue in each European country during the period of the reconstruction. This study focuses on the one of the major institutional policies in the public housing sectors in Europe during the second postwar period, specifically the INA (Istituto Nazionale delle Assicurazioni)-Casa in Italy from 1949 to 1963. Thanks to the financial Aid provided by 'Marshall Plan' of United States government, Italy initiated INA-Casa housing program elaborated and realized by minister of Labour, Amintore Fanfani. He was strongly influenced by catholic socialism and Weberian corporatism, and also had previously written theoretical studies on the subject during the Interwar years. The outcome of this policy had been devaluated for its Keynesian aspect as well as vernacular predominance in the architectural forms. On the contrary, this study focuses on themes such as continuity of politics before and after the Liberation, status of the architects and their will to social engagement, notion of quarter as 'self-sufficient community' and 'residential unit'. These factors will allow to comprehend the complex nature of the reality where different categories were involved to resolve the common housing problem.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제42호
• /
• pp.423-447
• /
• 2015

이 논문의 연구목적은 북한에서 사회적 일탈행위에 대한 처벌과 재사회화의 양식이 형성된 기원을 분석하는 것이다. 이 논문은 북한에서 일탈에 대한 처벌과 재사회화의 양식이 한국전쟁을 전후한 세 시기, 즉 해방 이후의 국가건설기(1945-50), 한국전쟁기(1950-53), 그리고 국가재건기(1950-61)를 통해 형성되었음을 분석하였다. 첫째, 해방 이후 북한은 '민주개혁'을 통해 일본제국주의 잔재와 봉건제도를 청산하게 된다. 북한에서 새롭게 건설된 국가는 '인민민주주의'의 규범에 기반하여 사회적 일탈자들을 처벌하고 이들에 대한 재사회화를 정당화하였다. 둘째, 한국전쟁은 북한사회를 전시체제로 급속히 전환시켰다. 전시체제하에서 사회적 일탈행위는 이적행위로 규정되어 처벌과 낙인찍기의 대상이 되었다. 셋째, 전후 북한은 전시행위에 준하여 반동적요소(적대계층)를 색출하고 이들을 처벌 고립시켜 나갔다. 전후 북한의 인민들은 수직적으로 통제되고 수평적으로 단절된 구조하에서 감시와 처벌, 교육을 통해 사회주의적 인간으로 재사회화 되었다.