• 제목/요약/키워드: Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy

검색결과 125건 처리시간 0.027초

Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma

  • Lim, Do Hoon
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • 제12권4호
    • /
    • pp.205-209
    • /
    • 2012
  • In gastric adenocarcinoma, high rates of loco-regional recurrences have been reported even after complete resection, and various studies have been tried to find the role of postoperative adjuvant therapy. Among them, Intergroup 0116 trial was a landmark trial, and demonstrated the definite survival benefit in adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, compared with surgery alone. However, the INT 0116 trial had major limitation for global acceptance of the INT 0116 regimen as an adjuvant treatment modality because of the limited lymph node dissection. Lately, several randomized studies that were performed to patients with D2-dissected gastric cancer were published. This review summarizes the data about patterns of failure after surgical resection and the earlier prospective studies, including INT 0116 study. Author will introduce the latest studies, including ARTIST trial and discuss whether external beam radiotherapy should be applied to patients receiving extended lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy.

직장암에서 수술단독 또는 수술후 방사선치료 -생존율, 골반종양제어율, 예후인자를 중심으로- (Surgery Alone or Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer - With Respect to Survival, Pelvic Control, Prognostic Factor -)

  • 남택근;안성자;나병식
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제19권4호
    • /
    • pp.327-334
    • /
    • 2001
  • 목적 : 직장암에 대한 수술 단독 또는 수술후 방사선치료를 받은 환자를 대상으로 골반종양제어율과 생존율, 합병증 발생률, 예후인자 등을 후향적으로 비교 분석하여 방사선치료의 역할을 평가한다. 대상 및 방법 : 1982년 2월부터 1996년 12월까지 총 212명의 환자가 modified Astler-Coiler 병기 $B2\~C3$ 직장암으로 진단되어 근치적목적의 수술단독 또는 수술후 방사선치료를 시행하였는데, 이중 39.6 Gy 미만의 방사선치료를 받은 18명을 제외한 194명을 대상으로 하였다. 104명은 수술후 방사선치료를 받았고 90명은 수술 단독을 시행하였다. 방사선치료는 일일 조사량 $1.8\~2.0\;Gy$로 주 5회씩 전골반강에 $39.6\~55.8\;Gy$ (평균:49.9 Gy)를 조사하였고 필요시 원발 종양 절제부위에 $5.4\~10\;Gy$를 추가 조사하였다. 생존율과 골반종양제어율의 산출은 Kaplan-Meier방법으로, 이들의 통계적 유의성검증은 Log-rank test로 하였다. 다요인 분석은 Cox proportional hazards model을 이용하였다. 결과 : 전체 환자의 5년 생존율 및 무병 생존율은 각각 $53\%,\;49\%$이었다. 수술단독군과 방사선치료 추가군의 5년 생존율은 각각 $63\%$$45\%$로 유의한 차이를 보였다(p=0.03). 그러나 이러한 차이는 방사선치료 추가군에서 진행된 병기의 환자가 더 많이 분포함에 기인한 것으로 생각되었다(p<0.05 by $\chi^2-test$). 수술단독군과 방사선치료 추가군의 5년생존율은 병기 B2+3, C1, C2+3 군에서 각각 $68\%$$55\%$ (p=0.09), $100\%$$100\%,\;40\%$$33\%$ (p=0.71)로 두 군간의 유의한 차이는 없었다. 위의 병기별 5년 무병생존율은 각각 $65\%$$49\%$ (p=0.14), $100\%$$100\%,\;33\%$$31\%$ (p=0.46)로 역시 유의한 차이는 없었다. 전체 환자의 5년 골반종양제어율은 $72.5\%$이었다. 수술단독군과 방사선치료 추가군의 골반종양제어율은 각각 $71\%,\;74\%$이었다(p=0.41). 병기 B2+3, C1, C2+3군에서 수술달독군과 방사선치료 추가군의 골반종양제어율은 각각 $79\%$$75\%$ (p=0.88), $100\%$$100\%,\;44\%$$68\%$ (p=0.01)이었다. 전체 환자를 대상으로 다요인 분석을 시행한 결과 생존율과 무병생존율에 병기만이 유의하였고 두 치료 군에서도 역시 병기가 유의한 인자로 나타났다. 전체환자에서 골반종양제어율에 유의한 예후인자로 다요인분석을 시행한 결과 병기와 수술방법이 유의하였다. 수술단독군에서는 병기만이 유의하였고 방사선치료 추가군에서는 수술방법만이 유의하여 복부회음절제술군의 골반종양재발률이 높았다. 결론 : 본 후향적 연구에서 수술 후 보조적 방사선치료를 시행하여 수술단독군에 비해 병기 C2+3군에서 골반종양제어율이 향상되었음을 알 수 있었다. 그러나 병기 B2이상의 모든 환자에서 골반종양제어율 뿐만 아니라 생존율의 향상을 가져오기 위해서는 최근 효용성이 널리 입증된 연속주사법의 5-FU를 포함한 동시적 항함화학방사선 병용요법이 시도되어야 할 것으로 생각된다.

  • PDF

Neck muscle atrophy and soft-tissue fibrosis after neck dissection and postoperative radiotherapy for oral cancer

  • Kim, Jinu;Shin, Eun Seow;Kim, Jeong Eon;Yoon, Sang Pil;Kim, Young Suk
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제33권4호
    • /
    • pp.344-349
    • /
    • 2015
  • Late complications of head and neck cancer survivors include neck muscle atrophy and soft-tissue fibrosis. We present an autopsy case of neck muscle atrophy and soft-tissue fibrosis (sternocleidomastoid, omohyoid, digastric, sternohyoid, sternothyroid, and platysma muscles) within the radiation field after modified radical neck dissection type I and postoperative radiotherapy for floor of mouth cancer. A 70-year-old man underwent primary tumor resection of the left floor of mouth, left marginal mandibulectomy, left modified radical neck dissection type I, and reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap. The patient received adjuvant radiotherapy. The dose to the primary tumor bed and involved neck nodes was 63 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks. Areas of subclinical disease (left lower neck) received 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not administered.

Treatment outcomes after adjuvant radiotherapy following surgery for patients with stage I endometrial cancer

  • Kim, Jiyoung;Lee, Kyung-Ja;Park, Kyung-Ran;Ha, Boram;Kim, Yi-Jun;Jung, Wonguen;Lee, Rena;Kim, Seung Cheol;Moon, Hye Sung;Ju, Woong;Kim, Yun Hwan;Lee, Jihae
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제34권4호
    • /
    • pp.265-272
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy using vaginal brachytherapy (VB) with a lower dose per fraction and/or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) following surgery for patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma. Materials and Methods: The subjects were 43 patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I endometrial cancer who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy following surgery between March 2000 and April 2014. Of these, 25 received postoperative VB alone, while 18 received postoperative EBRT to the whole pelvis; 3 of these were treated with EBRT plus VB. The median EBRT dose was 50.0 Gy (45.0-50.4 Gy) and the VB dose was 24 Gy in 6 fractions. Tumor dose was prescribed at a depth of 5 mm from the cylinder surface and delivered twice per week. Results: The median follow-up period for all patients was 57 months (range, 9 to 188 months). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 92.5% and 95.3%, respectively. Adjuvant radiotherapy was performed according to risk factors and stage IB, grade 3 and lymphovascular invasion were observed more frequently in the EBRT group. Five-year DFS for EBRT and VB alone were 88.1% and 96.0%, respectively (p = 0.42), and 5-year OS for EBRT and VB alone were 94.4% and 96%, respectively (p = 0.38). There was no locoregional recurrence in any patient. Two patients who received EBRT and 1 patient who received VB alone developed distant metastatic disease. Two patients who received EBRT had severe complications, one each of grade 3 gastrointestinal complication and pelvic bone insufficiency fracture. Conclusion: Adjuvant radiotherapy achieved high DFS and OS with acceptable toxicity in stage I endometrial cancer. VB (with a lower dose per fraction) may be a viable option for selected patients with early-stage endometrial cancer following surgery.

Update on Adjuvant Treatment in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Potential Biomarkers Predicting Postoperative Relapse

  • Jeong Uk Lim
    • Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
    • /
    • 제86권1호
    • /
    • pp.14-22
    • /
    • 2023
  • A significant proportion of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is diagnosed in the early and resectable stage. Despite the use of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, there was only a marginal increase in overall survival and a 15% decrease in relapse. With the advents of immunotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), the landscape of adjuvant treatment in completely resectable NSCLC is changing. Postoperative radiotherapy can be beneficial to patients who underwent surgical resection in certain clinical settings. In addition, new biomarkers that predict efficacy of EGFR TKI and immunotherapy as adjuvant treatment are also necessary. In this review, recent updates in adjuvant treatment in resectable NSCLC were briefly explained.

Instrumentation Failure after Partial Corpectomy with Instrumentation of a Metastatic Spine

  • Park, Sung Bae;Kim, Ki Jeong;Han, Sanghyun;Oh, Sohee;Kim, Chi Heon;Chung, Chun Kee
    • Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
    • /
    • 제61권3호
    • /
    • pp.415-423
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objective : To identify the perioperative factors associated with instrument failure in patients undergoing a partial corpectomy with instrumentation (PCI) for spinal metastasis. Methods : We assessed the one hundred twenty-four patients with who underwent PCI for a metastatic spine from 1987 to 2011. Outcome measure was the risk factor related to implantation failure. The preoperative factors analyzed were age, sex, ambulation, American Spinal Injury Association grade, bone mineral density, use of steroid, primary tumor site, number of vertebrae with metastasis, extra-bone metastasis, preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and preoperative spinal radiotherapy. The intraoperative factors were the number of fixed vertebrae, fixation in osteolytic vertebrae, bone grafting, and type of surgical approach. The postoperative factors included postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and spinal radiotherapy. This study was supported by the National Research Foundation grant funded by government. There were no study-specific biases related to conflicts of interest. Results : There were 15 instrumentation failures (15/124, 12.1%). Preoperative ambulatory status and primary tumor site were not significantly related to the development of implant failure. There were no significant associations between insertion of a bone graft into the partial corpectomy site and instrumentation failure. The preoperative and operative factors analyzed were not significantly related to instrumentation failure. In univariable and multivariable analyses, postoperative spinal radiotherapy was the only significant variable related to instrumentation failure (p=0.049 and 0.050, respectively). Conclusion : When performing PCI in patients with spinal metastasis followed by postoperative spinal radiotherapy, the surgeon may consider the possibility of instrumentation failure and find other strategies for augmentation than the use of a bone graft for fusion.

대장선암의 치료에 있어 수술후 방사선 치료의 역할 (The Role of Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in the Management of Adenocarcinoma of the Colon -A Review of 21 Patients-)

  • 박경호;노준규;서창옥;김동원
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제6권1호
    • /
    • pp.49-54
    • /
    • 1988
  • 대장선암의 근본적인 치료는 외과적 절제술로 알려져 있으나 이 경우 직장선암과 마찬가지로 수술 후 국소재발이 문제시되어 왔다. 직장선암의 경우 수술 후 국소재발의 위험성이 볼은 판자에 수술후 방사선치료를 병용함으로써 국소제어율 및 나아가서 생존율까지도 상당히 개선된다고 알려져 있다. 그러나 대장선암의 경우 국소제어율 및 생존율의 개선이 보고되고 있기는 하나 아직 널리 알려져 있지는 못하다. 이에 저자는 1970년 3월부터 1984년 12월까지 대장선암으로 진단받고 일차적으로 근치적 수술을 시행한 후 연세대학교 의과대학 치료방사선과에 내원한 21명의 환자를 후향성 분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 21명의 환자 중 수술후 방사선 치료를 병용하여 계획대로 무사히 마친 환자는 11명이었다. 2. 수술후 방사선 치료를 병용한 환자들의 전체적 인 국소실패율은 $9\%(1/11)$이었고 병기별로는 B2+B3가(0/4), Cl+C2+C3가 $14\%(1/7)$였고 C1이 0(0/2) B2+C2가 $17\%(1/6)$, B3+C3가 0(0/3)였다. 3. 수술후 방사선 치료를 병용한 환자들의 5년 생존율은 $55\%$였다.

  • PDF

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Three Different Neoadjuvant Approaches (Chemotherapy Combined Vaginal Intracavitary Irradiation, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Alone or Radiotherapy) Combined with Surgery for Patients with Stage Ib2 and IIa2 Cervical Cancer

  • Fu, Jian-Hong;Gao, Zhan;Ren, Chen-Chen;Shi, Yong-Gang
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제14권4호
    • /
    • pp.2377-2381
    • /
    • 2013
  • A total of 285 patients with stage Ib2 and IIa2 cervical cancer were categorized into three groups, and received preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with vaginal intracavitary irradiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or radiotherapy, respectively. The effective rate of 70.6 % in group 1 was much higher than 41.4% in group 2 (P=0.000) and 46.9 % in group 3 (P=0.000); The percentage of patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy was 44.1% in group 1, much lower than 67.8% in group 2 (P=0.001) and 64.6% in group 3 (P=0.004); The percentage of patients with no postoperative risk factor in group 1 was 52.0%, much higher than 32.2% in group 2 (P=0.006) and 35.4% in group 3 (P=0.019); The occurrence rate of surgery-related complications in groups 1, 2 and 3 were 29.4%, 28.7%, and 33.3%, respectively, with no statistical differences among the groups (P=0.981). Regarding preoperative neoadjuvant complications, none were obvious in group 3, while occurrence rates of myelosuppression in groups 1 and 2 were 89.1% and 86.6%, of nausea and vomitting were 78.4% and 78.2%, but without significant differences (all P>0.05). Among 166 patients who received postoperative adjuvant therapy in the three groups, the occurrence rates were: 65.4%, 64.3% and 61.1% respectively for myelosuppression; 42.3%, 38.1%, and 38.9% for nausea and vomiting; 9.6%, 9.5% and 9.7% for urocystitis; and 63.5%, 69.0% and 65.3% enteritis and rectitis. There were no statistically significant differences among them (all P>0.05). The five-year disease-free survival rates (DFS) in groups 1, 2, 3 were 78.3%, 75.1%, 80.9%, respectively; the five-year overall survival rates (OS) were 81.4%, 78.2%, and 81.1%, respectively. The five-year OS of 166 patients receiving postoperative in the three groups were 72.4%, 69.5%, and 71.8%, respectively, with no significant variation (all P>0.05). Although there were no differences among three groups in DFS and OS, preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with intracavitary radiotherapy may increase the effective rate and the percentage of patients with no postoperative risk factors and decrease the percentage of patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy, thereby decreasing complications indirectly and increasing quality of life.

대장선암의 치료에 있어 수술후 방사선 치료의 역할 (The Role of Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in the Management of Adenocarcinoma of the Colon -A review of 21 Patients-)

  • 박경호;김동원;노준규;서창옥
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제7권1호
    • /
    • pp.51-57
    • /
    • 1989
  • 대장선암의 근본적인 치료는 외과적 절제술로 알려져 있으나 이 경우 직장선암과 마찬가지고 수술 후 국소재발이 문제시되어 왔다. 직장선암의 경우 수술후 국소재발의 위험성이 높은 환자에 수술후 방사선 치료를 병용함으로써 국소제어율 및 나아가서 생존율까지도 상당히 개선된다고 알려져 있다. 그러나 대장선암의 경우 국소제어율 및 생존율의 개선이 보고되고 있기는 하나 아직 알려져 있지는 못하다. 이에 저자는 1970년 3월부터 1984년 12월까지 대장선암으로 진단받고 일차적으로 근치적 수술을 시행한 후 연세대학교 의과대학 치료방사선과에 내원한 21명의 환자를 후향성 분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 21명의 환자 중 수술후 방사선 치료를 병용하여 계획대로 무사히 마친 환자는 11명이었다. 2. 수술후 방사선 치료를 병용한 환자들의 전체적인 국소실패율은 $9\%(1/11)$이었고 병기별로는 B2+B3가 (0/4), Cl+C2+C3가 $14\%$ (1/7)였고 Cl이 0 (0/2) B2+C2가 $17\%$ (1/6), B3+C3가 0(O/3)였다. 3. 수술후 방사선 치료를 병용한 환자들의 5년 생존율은 $55\%$였다.

  • PDF

Patterns of failure and prognostic factors in resected extrahepatic bile duct cancer: implication for adjuvant radiotherapy

  • Koo, Tae Ryool;Eom, Keun-Yong;Kim, In Ah;Cho, Jai Young;Yoon, Yoo-Seok;Hwang, Dae Wook;Han, Ho-Seong;Kim, Jae-Sung
    • Radiation Oncology Journal
    • /
    • 제32권2호
    • /
    • pp.63-69
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose: To find the applicability of adjuvant radiotherapy for extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC), we analyzed the pattern of failure and evaluate prognostic factors of locoregional failure after curative resection without adjuvant treatment. Materials and Methods: In 97 patients with resected EBDC, the location of tumor was classified as proximal (n = 26) and distal (n = 71), using the junction of the cystic duct and common hepatic duct as the dividing point. Locoregional failure sites were categorized as follows: the hepatoduodenal ligament and tumor bed, the celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery, and other sites. Results: The median follow-up time was 29 months for surviving patients. Three-year locoregional progression-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 50%, 42%, and 52%, respectively. Regarding initial failures, 79% and 81% were locoregional failures in proximal and distal EBDC patients, respectively. The most common site was the hepatoduodenal ligament and tumor bed. In the multivariate analysis, perineural invasion was associated with poor locoregional progression-free survival (p = 0.023) and progression-free survival (p = 0.012); and elevated postoperative CA19-9 (${\geq}37U/mL$) did with poor locoregional progression-free survival (p = 0.002), progression-free survival (p < 0.001) and overall survival (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both proximal and distal EBDC showed remarkable proportion of locoregional failure. Perineural invasion and elevated postoperative CA19-9 were risk factors of locoregional failure. In these patients with high risk of locoregional failure, adjuvant radiotherapy could be considered to improve locoregional control.