• 정신신체의학
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.26-35
• /
• 2015

연구목적 본 연구는 Lees-Haley가 1992년 개발한 Postconcussional Syndrome Questionnaire(PCSQ)의 한글판(K-PCSQ)을 개발하고 신뢰도와 타당도를 평가하여 임상적 유용성을 밝히고자 시행되었다. 방 법 2009년 4월 1일부터 2011년 12월 31일까지 고려대학교 안산병원 외래에 내원한 외상성 뇌 손상 환자들 중 International Classification of Disease-10(ICD-10)의 뇌진탕후증후군, 기질성 정신질환(기질성 기분장애, 기질성 불안장애, 기질성 인격장애, 기질성 감정이변성장애)의 진단기준을 만족하는 환자들을 대상으로 포함하였다. 환자들을 대상으로 자가 보고형 평가 척도인 K-PCSQ, State and Trait Anxiety inventory(STAI-I. II), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale(CESD)를 시행하였다. 수집된 자료로 PCSQ의 신뢰도와 타당도를 평가하였으며 요인분석을 시행하였다. 결 과 K-PCSQ의 Cronbach's alpha 값은 0.956, 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 0.836이었으며 STAI-I. II, CESD와 유의한 상관관계를 보였다. 요인 분석 결과 K-PCSQ는 4개의 요인구조를 보였으며, 제 1 요인은 '기분 및 인지 증상' 요인, 제 2 요인은 '신체 증상' 요인, 제 3 요인은 '드물게 나타나는 증상' 요인, 제 4 요인은 '과장 또는 부주의한 응답' 요인으로 나타났다. 뇌진탕후 증후군 환자와 기질성 정신질환 환자 두 군에서 K-PCSQ의 총점과 4가지 하위 요인의 점수를 비교하였을 때 두 군 간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. '과장 또는 부주의한 응답' 항목에 답변한 대상자들은 그렇지 않은 대상자에 비해 K-PCSQ의 총점과 4가지 하위 요인의 점수가 유의하게 높았다. 결 론 본 연구는 K-PCSQ가 두부외상으로 인한 정신의학적 증상을 평가하는데 있어서 유용한 도구임을 확인하였으며, 추후 보다 많은 환자를 대상으로 하는 연구를 통해 임상적인 유용성의 평가 이루어져야 할 것으로 생각된다.

• 생물정신의학
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.310-315
• /
• 2008

Objectives : The evaluation of disability after trauma in psychiatry is relatively subjective compared with other departments. A consensus among evaluators could improve reliability of evaluations. We compared disability rate of common psychiatric disorders without definite brain injury depending on their diagnosis from experienced evaluators in Korea. Methods : A written questionnaire was mailed to each evaluator and the reply was analyzed. The questions included disability rate ranges of postconcussional syndrome, PTSD and depression. Other questions related with admission for evaluation, expected duration of treatment, life expectancy and need of supporting person were also asked. Results : Range of disability rate were from $8.6{\pm}4.5%$ to $26.6{\pm}12.8%$ in postconcussional syndrome, from $10.4{\pm}6.8%$ to $36.4{\pm}13.8%$ in PTSD and from $10.0{\pm}4.6%$ to $30.6{\pm}10.3%$ in depressive disorder. There were lots of diversity in expected duration of treatment with psychiatric disability. Decline of life expectancy and need of supporting person were considered at least 50% of disability. Conclusion : There is much diversity in evaluation of psychiatric disabilities with disability rate and expected duration of treatments even among experienced evaluators. A common consensus among experts may increase reliability of psychiatric evaluations after trauma.

• 한방재활의학과학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.73-79
• /
• 2019

Objectives The purpose of this study is to provide Korean version of mild traumatic brain injury assessment tool. Methods The original version of acute concussion evaluation (ACE) was translated into Korean, and it was then back-translated into English without any prior knowledge of ACE. Finally, the pre-final version of Korean version of acute concussion evaluation (K-ACE) was derived. 49 Korean patients who had been diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury participated in the study and completed K-ACE. Overall, 44 data were used to analyze findings. Validity of the study was assessed based on Concurrent validity. Reliability was also evaluated using Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results The Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ value for each item presented a proper level of internal consistency with results of 0.711 to 0.893 in two evaluations, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the retest reliability was marked as 0.892 (95% CI 0.840~0.933). Concurrent validity demonstrated positive correlations between K-ACE and Korean version of postconcussional syndrome questionnaire. Conclusions The K-ACE is concluded as a valid and reliable tool for measuring mild traumatic brain injury and post-concussion symptoms. Upon completion of the follow-up study, the K-ACE will be well-utilized by both clinicians and researchers.