• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제12권12호
• /
• pp.5974-5983
• /
• 2011

본 논문은 6.25전쟁이후 한국현대건축 형성에 미국과 일본건축이 미친 영향에 관한 연구다. 2차세계대전 종전과 함께 광복을 맞이한 후 미군정과 6.25전쟁을 거친 한국 건축계는 미국의 원조를 통해 미국식 건축교육시스템과 건축생산시스템의 영향권에 빠르게 편입되지만, 동시에 일제강점하에 형성된 인적 제도적 관성에 기초한 일본건축의 지속적인 영향 속에서 재편되었다. 본 연구의 목적은 미국과 일본에서 수학한 두 건축가(김정수와 김수근)의 작품을 분석하여 미국과 일본의 건축이 전후 한국의 현대건축 형성기에 어떠한 영향을 미쳤는지 밝히는데 있다. 전재 복구가 마무리된 후 경제개발 과정에서 낙후된 한국의 건축생산시스템의 한계를 극복해야 하는 당면과제를 김정수는 개인적 차원에서 새로운 재료와 구법 그리고 국제주의건축의 구현을 통해 실현시켰다면, 김수근은 한국종합기술개발공사를 통한 국가적 지원을 통해 극복하고자 했다. 두 건축가가 취한 해법의 차이는 국비와 개인부담이라는 유학자금, 미국 연수와 일본유학이라는 교육배경과 유학동기의 차이에 기인하고 있음을 밝혔다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.89-105
• /
• 2004

This paper investigates morphological theory as an intellectual framework for research and design. The first part of the paper will review morphological studies in the fields of urban geography, urban planning and architecture, particularly in England from the 1940s to the 1980s. While urban geographers and planners were concerned primarily with town plans, building forms and land use, architectural theoreticians were more interested in the topological relationship between urban and architectural space. The underlying premises and principles of these two approaches will be reviewed. The second part of the paper will focus on typology in Europe and North America. The reinterpretation of typology by Italian architects helped to bridge the gap between individual elements of architecture and the overall form of the city. However, typological theory became less accessible in post-war England and the United States. After 1980, the debate on typology became muted by the onset of vague notions such as functionalism, bio-technical determinism, and contextualism. This paper will propose a redefinition of morphology as a heuristic device, in contrast with the dichotomic view of urban morphology and architectural typology. Morphology will be shown to combine the geometrical and topological; the intentional and accidental; the real and abstract; and a priori and a posteriori. The last part of the paper discusses the lack of comparative theories and methods surrounding the physical form of architecture and the city by Korea commentators. Empirically rooted facility planning, non-comparative historical studies, and iconographic criticism emerged as a central preoccupation of architectural culture between the 1960s and 1980s, a time when international debate on architecture and urbanism was most intense. This paper will give consideration to the built environment as a dynamic physical entity and space as an epiphenomenon of daily urban life, such that collaboration between urban designers, architects, and landscape architects is seen as both beneficial and necessary.