• Title/Summary/Keyword: Pongola호 사건

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

A Study on the Claim for Damages for Detention resulted from the Breach of Safe Port Warranty under Voyage Charter (항해용선계약상 안전항담보의무위반에 의한 초과정박손해배상금의 청구에 관한 연구)

  • Han, Nak-Hyun
    • Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
    • /
    • v.25 no.2
    • /
    • pp.149-176
    • /
    • 2009
  • In Count case, the owners claimed from the charterers the amount of their loss resulting from the delay to the Count caused by the blockage of the channel due to stranding of the Pongola on the ground that this loss resulted from breach by the charterers of the safe port provisions. The Claim was referred to arbitration and dealt with on written submission. In a reasoned award, the arbitrators upheld the owners' claim. The charterers seek an order reversing the award or remitting it to the arbitrators for further consideration : (1) That the tribunal was wrong to find that the port of Beira was unsafe and that in consequence the charterers were liable to the owners in damages for detention. (2) That the tribunal was wrong to find that the port was unsafe in the abstract by reference to the fact that two other vessels had grounded there. (3) Having held that the Count was delayed for a little over four days by the fact that, after the charterers had nominated the port, the Pongola had grounded in the access channel, the tribunal should have held that the port was not prospectively unsafe. On the that the grounding the Pongola was caused by the characteristics which made the port an unsafe port to nominate for the Count. The court was held that it was not an independent event which broke the chain of causation between the breach of contract and the owner's loss. For those reasons, the court was upheld the arbitrator's award.

  • PDF