• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제18권10호
• /
• pp.147-162
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 목적은 정책자금 지원에 대한 효율성 분석을 통하여 국책은행에서 정책자금 지원의 실무적인 개선안을 제시하고자 한다. 국책은행에서 '17년과 '18년에 연속해서 정책자금을 지원받은 중소기업을 대상으로 지원현황에 대한 특성 분석과 재무적 성과의 효율성 분석을 위해 대응표본 T-test를 수행하였다. 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 중소기업의 특성 분석결과 외부에서 조성된 재정자금이 대부분이고, 업종별로는 제조업에 집중되었다. 지역별로는 경기 서부지역에, 신용등급별로는 A등급 구간이 가장 많았다. 기술등급은 T5 등급에, 자금 용도는 시설자금에 대부분 지원되었다. 둘째, 효율성 분석결과 수익성은 총자산순이익률, 안정성은 이자보상비율, 활동성은 총자본회전율에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 그러나 성장성에는 긍정적인 영향을 미치지 못하였다. 결론적으로 중소기업의 수요에 적합한 자금 배분과 성장성에 영향을 미칠 수 있도록 정책자금을 지원하는 실무적인 개선안을 제공할 것으로 기대된다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.75-97
• /
• 2014

Entrepreneurial financing, such as publicly initiated venture capital or grant schemes, serves as an important policy instrument that aims to bridge the financing gap facing young, innovative businesses, a gap that is mainly due to higher risk and growing uncertainty, and to strategically promote the creation of new ventures through the revitalization of their venture capital industries. This study examines public venture capital initiatives in Australia, Canada, and Sweden, and discovered that all three countries actively foster their venture capital industry through the formation of funds or the provision of tax incentives. It is notable that the majority of financing initiatives heavily depend on supply-side measures rather than demand-driven policies that focus on stimulating private investment in technological innovations and discoveries. This paper discusses in-depth the policy impact of public financing initiatives and their subsequent side-effects raised in the process such as overlapping in funding structure across the country, lack of monitoring and evaluation for feedback, fragmentation across the government ministries and agencies, and competition with the private sector, which may cause inefficiency as a result of public intervention. Financial constraints may arise for many reasons, partly resulting from the lack of investment readiness of young entrepreneurs. This signals a policy shift towards the creation of market-driven demand away from the traditional supply-push approach, and is a grand challenge to policymakers in entrepreneurial financing. Attention is leaning towards the efficiency and effectiveness of these public-financing initiatives in terms of their policy roles. It is worth noting that policy should focus on generating synergy so available resources can be channeled into the early, risky stage of new ventures, working as facilitator to the achievement of an intended policy goal.

• 한국교육학연구
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.51-79
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 현재 문재인 정부가 추진하고 있는 고등교육 정책이 우리 고등교육 체제가 당면한 구조적 문제점들을 해소할 수 있는지 비판적으로 성찰하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 (1) 해방 이후 압축적 성장에 따른 후유증을 앓고 있는 우리 고등교육 체제가 현재 당면한 가장 큰 구조적 문제점은 무엇인가? (2) 문재인 정부의 고등교육 구조 개혁 정책은 이러한 문제점들을 제대로 인식하고 적절한 해결책을 내놓고 있는가? (3) 구체적으로 현재 제안되거나 시행되고 있는 정책의 타당성과 문제점들은 무엇이며 주요 쟁점과 향후 고려할 만한 정책적 대안은 무엇인가? 라는 3개의 주요 연구문제를 설정하였다. 이러한 연구문제를 바탕으로 본 연구는 한국 고등교육 체제의 구조적 문제점을 중소규모 사립대학 위주의, 일반대학 중심의 고비용 저효율 구조와 고등교육기관 간 역할 구분의 미흡, 공급자 중심 운영 관행으로 지적하였으며, 고비용 저효율 구조를 개선할 수 있는 대안으로 폴리텍대학 및 사이버대학과의 역할 분담 및 연계를 제안하고 있다. 그리고 문재인 정부가 추진하고 있는 대표적 고등교육 정책인 국립대학 집중 지원과 공영형 사립대 육성 정책의 소요예산 확보 및 정책 수단의 실현 가능성 등에 대한 심층적 분석과 사회적 공론화 과정이 필요함을 제시하였다. 또한 고등교육 재정지원 시스템의 효과성을 위해서는 대학의 재정지원대상 그룹별로 정부의 개입 정도를 달리 하는 유연한 접근법이 필요함을 제시하였다.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제49권4호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2018

The Korean fisheries industry is a traditional business, the majority of which are small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It has played an important role in the South Korean economies in the past several decades, but it currently faces the limitations of growth potential and profitability due to declining workforce, aging populations, deteriorating fishery environments, climate changes, and rapid changes in the global industrial ecosystem. Many studies have suggested solutions for the fisheries industry in macro perspective, but there are rarely any studies taking the strategic approaches for the problem. If it is possible for governments to support the companies that are likely to increase their value-added selectively, it will break through the current situation more effectively. This paper introduces a study on the selection method utilizing data envelopment analysis (DEA) to find SMEs with potentials to increase profits and growth. We suggest selecting SMEs with high management efficiency and ability to utilize intangible assets as the target companies. We also suggest policy objectives for SMEs in the domestic fisheries industry based on the results of DEA analysis and propose a data-based method for the policy decisions.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 International Conference on Digital Policy & Management
• /
• pp.145-168
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion overfive years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400-million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국디지털정책학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.95-118
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Research is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments' industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime Minister?in January 2001, commits an additional $3 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims to?build world competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity.?It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around $400?million a year. This cost is expected to rise to over half a billion by 2005-06 (Commonwealth of Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.420-453
• /
• 2018

국가연구개발사업의 예산 규모가 증가하고 연구비 오남용 사례들이 끊임없이 보고되는 가운데, 연구비 지출에 대한 통제와 관리의 필요성이 제기된다. 그러나 연구비 사용에 대한 과도한 규제는 연구비 지원정책 본연의 목적에 어긋나며, 연구수행기관의 연구개발성과에도 악영향을 줄 가능성이 높다. 특히, 연구자금 확보가 절실한 중소기업에게 연구비 규제는 더욱 민감하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국가연구개발사업의 연구비 지원을 받은 중소기업을 대상으로 고정효과 패널모형을 사용하여, 중소기업의 연구비 재원과 연구개발성과에 대한 분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 정부연구비 규모가 커질수록 연구개발성과가 높아지는 것으로 나타나 정부연구비의 효과성이 실증적으로 검증되었다. 그러나 민간연구비의 효과성은 분석모형에 따라 달라지는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한, 연구비가 재량적으로 집행될수록(간접비 비율이 높아질수록) 정부연구비와 민간연구비의 효율성이 모두 증가하였으며, 특히 민간연구비의 효율성이 상대적으로 높게 증가함을 알 수 있었다. 한편 민간연구비의 경우, 간접비 비율에 따라 효과성이 조절될 수 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 분석결과를 바탕으로 다양한 행정가치들(효과성, 효율성, 책임성)간의 상호작용을 통해 연구비 재원과 연구개발성과를 살펴봄으로써, 중소기업의 연구개발성과를 높일 수 있는 정책적 시사점을 도출하였다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.49-57
• /
• 2012

인터넷전화(VoIP), 인터넷TV(IPTV), 클라우드컴퓨팅(Cloud Computing), 스마트폰(Smart Phone) 등 스마트 IT 시대가 진전되면서 데이터(data) 전송이 폭증하고 있고, 서비스의 품질보장(QoS, Quality of Service)이 더욱 중요시되고 있다. 따라서 인터넷 트래픽(internet traffic)의 체증문제를 효율적으로 해소하고 망의 지속적인 업그레이드(upgrade)를 촉진하는 유인체계(incentive system)를 마련하는 것이 절실히 요청되고 있다. 그러나 한편에서는 인터넷망에서 어떠한 차별도 없는 '철저한 망중립성(Network Neutrality)'이 오늘날의 인터넷시대를 가능하게 한 일등공신임을 주장하면서 엄격한 망중립성을 법제화할 것을 요구하고 기존 제도를 고수할(Status Quo) 것을 주장하기도 한다. 따라서 본 연구는 인터넷환경의 변화를 살펴보고 망중립성 이슈를 분석한 후 선순환 인터넷생태계의 조성과 공정경쟁의 보장 및 이용자편익의 최대화를 위해서는 시장메커니즘의 핵인 가격기구 즉 요금시스템이 제대로 작동되어야 함을 제기한다. 그리고 바람직한 인터넷 사용요금의 부과방안으로 이용량과 QoS 보장여부 등 인터넷 이용형태에 따라 가격을 차별화하고 중장기적으로 네트워크 확충에 필요한 재원을 마련하기 위해 이부가격제(two-part tariff)를 실시하는 방안을 제시한다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.135-159
• /
• 2004

In industrialised countries, innovation is a key source of economic growth. Rrsearch is a key driver of technological innovation and involves the process of systematic investigation and/or experimentation to discover new knowledge. The Governments'industry innovation policy supports a business focus on Research and Development (R&D) through a range of programs in order to achieve these aims. The Innovation Statement (DISR 2000, 20010, launched by the Australian Prime MinisterJanuary 2001, commits an additional ${\$}$3 billion over five years to encourage and support innovation. The Australian Government aims toworld competitive firms and strong research capability in industry to strengthen Australia's international competitiveness and increase national prosperity. It develops policies and programs to enhance investment in innovation. The Australian Government has established a number of R&D funding support programs aimed at increasing the level of R&D in Australia. The backbone of these programs is the tax concession program, which is made up of the 125 per cent R&D tax concession, the 175 per cent premium tax concession and the tax offset. Over 4000 businesses take advantage of the tax concession scheme, which costs the government around ${\$}$400mi11ion a year. This cost is expected to rise to over hall a billion by 2005-06 (commonwealth or Australia, 2003). Ensuring these resources are invested where they provide significant national economic benefits is a major policy issue. In this sense, this paper looks at the appropriateness, effectiveness and efficiency of the R&D tax concession with costs and benefits analysis.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제1권4호
• /
• pp.41-61
• /
• 2010

The Korean government's support towards the establishment of leading research hubs at universities began with the initiation of the Science/ Engineering Research Center in 1990. Such efforts to provide support to research organizations have continued for some twenty years in various forms, which implies that building research hubs was critical in acquiring global leadership in research. However, the effect of such research hub nurturing policies has never been properly evaluated, apart from an assessment of their validity. Therefore, this paper analyzes how major programs to form research groups by providing assistance to joint research by researchers at universities are operated, and the characteristics of such programs through comparative analysis with other programs. There are two major focal points in the analysis: the first is the evaluation of the level of differentiation between Research Organization Support Programs (ROP) and other R&D Programs from an efficiency perspective, and the second is an examination of the extent of systematization of research organizations that exist at universities and impact of Research Organization Support Programs on the activities of participating professors from an effectiveness perspective. The result showed that the ROP were no longer only relevant for the formation and maintenance of research groups. Other R&D Programs are growing increasingly larger in scale and conducted over longer periods of time. Thus, the ROP can no longer be differentiated from other programs in research period and size of funding. An analysis on the effect of ROP demonstrated that all activities by participating professors in organizations that were the beneficiaries of group research assistance were more active compared to their counterparts in organizations that received other research support, but there was little difference in the elements of systematization. This implies that the joint research conducted at universities is not systematized and that it is still research based on individual themes but conducted jointly. In addition, it also means that the ROP is failing to effectively lead the systematization of research. In other words, today, university research organizations are not operated as independent, long-term bodies, but are more relevant as a combination of research units of individual professors.