• Title/Summary/Keyword: Plant specific emission factor

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Development of CO2 Emission Factor by Fuel and CO2 analysis at Sub-bituminous Fired Power Plant (연료와 CO2 농도분석을 이용한 아역청탄 화력발전소의 온실가스 배출계수 개발)

  • Jeon, Eui-Chan;Sa, Jae-Hwan
    • Journal of Environmental Health Sciences
    • /
    • v.36 no.2
    • /
    • pp.128-135
    • /
    • 2010
  • The main purpose of this study was to develop the greenhouse gas emission factor for power plant using sub-bituminous coal. In Korea, Fired power plant are a major source of greenhouse gases within the fossil fuel combustion sectors, thus the development of emission factors is necessary to understand the characteristics of the national specific greenhouse gas emission and to develop nation specific emission factors. These emission factors were derived from the $CO_2$ concentrations measurement from stack and fuel analysis of sub-bituminous coal. Caloric value of sub-bituminous coal used in the power plants were 5,264 (as received basis), 5,936 (air-dried basis) and 6,575 kcal/kg (dry basis). The C emission factors by fuel analysis and $CO_2$ concentration measurement was estimated to be 26.7(${\pm}0.9$), 26.3(${\pm}2.8$)tC/MJ, respectively. Our estimates of C emission factors were comparable with IPCC default value.

An Estimation of Plant Specific Emission Factors for CO2 in Iron and Steel Industry (철강 산업의 산업공정부문 CO2 실측 배출계수 산정에 관한 연구)

  • Eom, Y.S.;Hong, J.H.;Kim, J.S.;Kim, D.G.;Lee, S.B.;Song, H.D.;Lee, S.H.
    • Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment
    • /
    • v.23 no.1
    • /
    • pp.50-63
    • /
    • 2007
  • The development of domestic plant specific emission factors is very important to estimate reliable national emissions management. This study, for the reason, was carried out to obtain advances emission factor for Carbon Dioxide ($CO_2$) by source-specific emission tests from the iron and steel industry sector which is well known as one of the major sources of greenhouse gases ($CO_2$). Emission factors estimated in this study were compared with those of IPCC for evaluation and they were found to be of similar level in the case of $CO_2$. There was no good information available on $CO_2$ plant specific emission factors from the iron and steel industry in Korea so far. The major emission sources of $CO_2$ examined from the iron and steel manufacturing precesses were a hot blast stove, coke oven, sintering furnace, electric arc furnace, heating furnace, and so on. In this study, the concentration of $CO_2$ from the hot blast stove process was the highest among all processes. The $CO_2$ emission factors for a ton of Steel and Iron products (using B-C oil) were estimated to be 0.315 $CO_2$ tonne (by Tier 3 method) and 4.89 $CO_2$ tonne. In addition, emission factor of $CO_2$ for heating furnace process was the highest among all process. Emission factors estimated in this study were compared with those of IPCC for evaluation and they were found to be of similar level in the case of $CO_2$.

Comparison of N2O Emissions by Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimation Method (온실가스 배출량 산정 방법에 따른 N2O 배출량 비교)

  • Kang, Soyoung;Cho, Chang-Sang;Kim, Seungjin;Kang, Seongmin;Yoon, Hyeongi;Jeon, Eui-Chan
    • Journal of Climate Change Research
    • /
    • v.6 no.3
    • /
    • pp.175-184
    • /
    • 2015
  • In this study GC and PAS were used to calculate $N_2O$ concentration of exhaust gas from Wood Chip combustion system. Fuel supplied to the incinerator was collected and analyzed and then the analysis result was used to calculate $N_2O$ emissions. Tier 3 and Tier 4 Method were used to calculate the $N_2O$ emissions. Plant's Specific emission factor of $N_2O$ by Tier 3 Method was 0.35 kg/TJ, while default emission factor of Wood?Wood Waste proposed by 2006 IPCC G/L was 4 kg/TJ. So the $N_2O$ emission factor of this study was 3.65 kg/TJ lower compared to the IPCC G/L. The total emissions calculated by Plant's specific emission factor was 4.22 kg during the measuring period, but by Tier 4 Method it was 7.88 kg. This difference in emissions was caused by the difference of continuous measuring and intermittent sampling. It would be necessary to apply continuous measuring to calculate emissions of $Non-CO_2$ gas whose the density distribution is relatively high. However currently, according to the target management guideline of greenhouse gas and energy, the continuous measuring method to calculate greenhouse gas emission is applied only to $CO_2$. Therefore for reliable greenhouse gas emission calculation it would be necessary to apply continuous measuring to calculate $Non-CO_2$ gas emission.