• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.877-884
• /
• 2012

Phase I trials determine the maximum tolerated dose(MTD) and the recommended dose(RD) for subsequent Phase II trials. In this paper, a MTD estimation method applied to a biased coin design is proposed for Phase I Clinical Trials. The suggested MTD estimation method is compared to the SM3 method and the NM method (Lee and Kim, 2012) using a Monte Carlo simulation study.

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한예방의학회 2002년도 제54차 추계 학술대회 연제집
• /
• pp.192-193
• /
• 2002

• 한국발생생물학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국발생생물학회 2009년도 특별 Symposium
• /
• pp.43-45
• /
• 2009

• Journal of Acupuncture Research
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.183-198
• /
• 1998

This study was done in order to present clinical trial method for safety of herb-acupuncture. The results were summerized as follow: In case of western medicine, clinical trial divides into four phase 1. Phase I: Investigate safety and drug movement for health people. 2. The first phase II: Investigate safety, effectiveness for the limited patient. The late phase II: Investigate propriety of an applicable disease, the way to use and dose. 3. Phase III: Through the comparative, public trial, investigate a final, applicable disease and side effect. 4. Phase IV: After NDA, investigate safety and effectiveness for the wide patients. In case of herb-acupuncture, we have to investigate the following for safety and effectiveness 1. Drug dose: Decide with 1/2 or 1/3 of oral dosage or a basis of animal's of maximum dosage or a ratio of man and animal. 2. Toxicity: Examine blood, urine, liver function, EKG, after herb-acupuncture during acertain period of time. 3. Regional response: Estimate response of swelling, redness, pruritus. etc 4. Treatment effectiveness: After exactly diagnosis, estimate effectiveness with a objective guide post.

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한예방의학회 2001년도 제53차 추계 학술대회 연제집
• /
• pp.305-307
• /
• 2001

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.163-173
• /
• 2019

Simon's two-stage designs are frequently used in phase II single-arm trials for efficacy studies. A concern of safety studies is too many patients who experience an adverse event. We show that Simon's two-stage designs for efficacy studies can be similarly used to design a two-stage safety study by modifying some of the design parameters. Given the type I and II error rates and the proportion of adverse events experienced in the first stage cohort, we prescribe a procedure whether to terminate the trial or proceed with a stage 2 trial by recruiting additional patients. We study the relationship between a two-stage design with a safety endpoint and an efficacy endpoint as well as use simulation studies to ascertain their properties. We provide a real-life application and a free R package gen2stage to facilitate direct use of two-stage designs in a safety study.

• 응용통계연구
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2019

최근에 제안된 심리스(seamless) 제 2상/제 3상 임상시험 디자인은 기존의 임상시험 디자인들과 비교하여 피험자수를 줄일 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 임상 개발 시간을 단축시킬 수 있다는 장점을 가지고 있어 임상시험연구자들의 많은 관심을 끌고 있다. 또한 제 3상 시험을 단독으로 진행 하였을 때보다 더 높은 검정력을 가질 수 있으므로 임상시험에서 매우 효율적이라 말할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 제 2상에서 최고효과 용량군을 선정하기 위한 여러 가지 다중가설 검정방법들을 제시하고 제 2상에서 최고효과 용량군을 선정한 후에 제 2상과 제 3상을 결합하는 여러 가지 유의확률 결합검정방법들을 제시하였다. 또한 모의실험을 통해서 심리스 제 2상/제 3상 임상설계가 적용되었을 때 여러 가지 방법들을 비교함으로써, 제 2상/제 3상 표본의 크기 조합이나 분산의 크기가 다른 여러 가지 상황에서 가장 적절한 방법을 선택하는 가이드라인을 제시하고자 한다.

• Journal of Acupuncture Research
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.227-242
• /
• 2008

Objectives : To compare the efficacy of local acupoint with distal acupuncture at relieving pain and improving function in knee osteoarthritis. Designs : A randomized, single-blinded, crossover clinical trial. Settings : One outpatient clinic(department of acupuncture & moxibustion) located in academic teaching hospital, South Korea. Patients : 17 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee(mean age 62.76[$SD{\pm}4.37$] years). Interventions : The trial had 4 stages : baseline(2weeks), phase I and II(each 2weeks), washout period(2weeks). Patients were randomly assigned to either group A or group B. Group A received acupuncture at local acupoints during phase I, then acupuncture at distal acupoints in phase II. Group B received the treatments in reverse order. In each phase, the patients were treated with acupuncture for 6 times. Measurements : The primary outcome was subjective pain as measured by a 100mm visual analogue scale(VAS) ranging from 0(no pain) to 10(worst pain ever). Secondary outcomes were changes in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC) total and pain scores. Measurements were obtained at baseline, 1st day of phase I and II, and 2 days after last treatment of phase I and II. Results : The 17 participants in 2 groups were well matched for age, sex, target knees, baseline VAS score, WOMAC pain score and WOMAC score. Participants in local acupoint group experienced greater improvement than distal acupoint group at 2 days after last treatment in WOMAC total score(mean difference, -10.65[95% CI, -20.56 to -0.74] ; P=0.036) but not in VAS(mean difference, -12.41[95% CI, -29.56 to 4.73] P=0.15) and WOMAC pain score(mean difference, -1.82[95% CI, -3.98 to 0.33] ; P=0.094). Conclusions : Local acupoints are more effective than distal acupoints at relieving pain and improving function in knee osteoarthritis.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.281-289
• /
• 2013

최근 국내 임상시험의 양적 증가와 더불어, 임상시험 자료를 효율적으로 관리할 수 있는 Electronic Data Capture(EDC) 시스템의 도입 요구가 증가하고 있다. 이에 따라 식품의약품안전청에서는 '임상시험 전자 자료 처리 및 관리를 위한 가이드라인'을 발표하였다. 이는 향후 국내 임상시험 전자 자료 관리에 관한 법률 제정을 위한 기초가 될 것으로 기대한다. 이 연구에서는 국내 임상시험 관련 기관인 병원과 임상시험 수탁기관(CRO), 그리고 제약회사에서의 EDC 시스템 이용 현황과 관계자들이 인식하는 가이드라인 및 전자 자료 표준의 중요성 및 적용 용이성과 이해도를 조사하였다. 국내 임상시험 관련 기관에서의 EDC 시스템 이용률은 77.6% 이었지만 EDC 시스템을 이용한 임상시험 건수는 5건 미만이 가장 많았다. EDC 시스템은 주로 약물동력학 시험을 하는 phase I과 임상효과와 안전성을 평가하는 phase II 임상시험에서 주로 이용되었고, 기관별로는 CRO의 이용률이 가장 높았다. 모든 집단에서 가이드라인의 중요성은 높게 인식하였으나, 적용 용이성 측면에서는 CRO에서 가장 높았다. 또한, 임상시험 전자 자료 표준의 중요성을 높게 인식하였고, 전자 자료 수집에 있어 표준의 필요성을 높게 인식하였다. 그러나 임상시험 전자 자료 국제표준인 Clinical Data Interchange Standard Consortium(CDISC)에 대한 이해도는 아직 낮은 수준이었다. 이 연구 결과는 국내 임상시험 전자화를 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있으며 임상시험 자료 표준에 관한 정책수립에도 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.329-337
• /
• 2024

Purpose: This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the PIKA-adjuvanted recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein subunit vaccine as a booster dose for healthy adults who had previously received two or more doses of an inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Materials and Methods: The study was a phase II multicenter, double-blinded, comparatorcontrolled, randomized trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the PIKA COVID-19 vaccine booster dose or an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (Sinovac, China). Safety was assessed based on adverse events, while immunogenicity was measured by neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels. Data on safety and immunogenicity were collected in the short-term (within 14 days after the booster dose) and long-term (from 90 to 365 days after the booster dose). Results: The PIKA-adjuvanted vaccine demonstrated a significant increase in neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron variant (geometric mean ratio [GMR]=2.0 on day 7, p-value <0.001; GMR=2.7 on day 14, p-value <0.001) and the wild type SARS-CoV-2 virus (GMR=2.3 on day 7, p-value <0.001; GMR=2.8 on day 14, p-value<0.001) in the early post-vaccination period when compared to the inactivated vaccine. Additionally, the PIKA COVID-19 vaccine showed higher seroconversion rates for neutralizing antibodies against both variants during the first 14 days post-vaccination. However, there were no significant differences in neutralizing antibody levels between the two vaccines from day 90 to day 360 post-vaccination. Serum IgG antibody levels for the PIKA COVID-19 vaccine were also higher throughout the study period. The incidence of adverse events was slightly higher in the PIKA COVID-19 group, with the most common events being pain at the injection site and headache. All adverse events were mild or moderate, with no reports of severe or life-threatening adverse events in either group. Conclusion: The PIKA COVID-19 vaccine, when administered as a booster dose, showed promising short- and long-term immunogenicity with no emergent safety issues identified. The booster dose of the PIKA COVID-19 vaccine elicited a robust immune response against various SARS-CoV-2 variants and provided some seroprotection for up to 360 days (ClinicalTrials. gov registration number: NCT05463419).