• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제50권3호
• /
• pp.307-317
• /
• 2023

심미성에 대한 요구가 증가함에 따라 유구치 수복을 위한 지르코니아 전장관은 더 활발하게 사용되고 있으나, 지르코니아 전장관으로 수복한 치아를 장기간 추적 관찰하거나 다른 재료와 비교한 연구는 많지 않다. 따라서 이 연구의 목적은 인접면 우식증에 대한 지르코니아 전장관과 기성금속관의 36개월 동안의 생존율을 비교하여 평가하고, 각 기성관의 수복 실패 양상을 분석하는 것이다. 2017년부터 2019년까지 조선대학교 치과병원 소아치과와 두 개의 개인 치과의원에 내원하여 두 기성관으로 수복 치료를 받은 498명 환자에 대한 1,061개의 유구치에 대한 전자의무기록지와 방사선 사진을 수집하고 분석하였다. 생존분석 결과, 기성금속관으로 수복한 치아의 생존율이 지르코니아 전장관에 비해 유의하게 높았다. 치수 치료 시행 여부를 나눠 생존 분석을 시행한 결과, 치수 치료를 시행하지 않은 경우, 기성금속관의 생존율이 지르코니아 전장관에 비해 유의하게 높았던 반면, 치수 치료를 시행한 경우에는 두 기성관의 생존율에 유의한 차이가 없었다. 기성금속관의 주된 수복실패 원인은 비정상적 치근 흡수 또는 치근단 투과상 병소의 발생이었고, 지르코니아 전장관의 경우 수복물의 탈락이었다. 이 연구는 임상가들에게 구치부 기성관 재료 선택 시 참고 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이라 생각된다.

• 치과방사선
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.111-126
• /
• 1998

In this study, radiographic evaluation was made using panoramic radiography and cross-sectional tomography of SCANORA/sup (R)/ in male and female adults in their 20's on the relationship between the maxillary sinus floor and the apex of the maxillary molar, to test the accuracy and effectiveness of the cross-sectional tomography, and to use this information in the assessment of preop. and postop. root canal treatment, apical surgery, extraction and implantology. Forty-one adults with an average age of 24.4 years were studied using panoramic radiography and cross-sectional tomography. In panoramic view and cross-sectional view, the position of the apices of maxillary molars were classified as separated, contacted, or protruded type; the general shape of the maxillary sinus floor was evaluated horizontally and vertically from cross-sectional tomography. The accuracy of each radiography was tested using maxilla from 5 fresh cadavers from the Anatomy Lab at Yonsei University Dental College, and panoramic view and cross-sectional tomography were taken in the same condition as with the patients. The results were as follows: 1. Panoramic view and cross-sectional view were taken in the maxilla specimen, and the actual distance between the maxillary sinus floor and the tooth apices were measured in the specimen; the median values of the distance from the tooth apices to the maxillary sinus floor in the panoramic view, cross-sectional view and in the actual maxilla specimen were 2.83 mm, 4.51mm, and 4.l5mm, respectively. In the cross-sectional view, the measured distance was close to the actual distance but in the panoramic view, the measured distance was far from the actual distance. 2. When the results of the panoramic view and cross-sectional view were compared, 40.5％ of the results agreed with each other in the two radiographic methods and buccal roots of the 2nd molar were the closest to the maxillary sinus floor in the cross-sectional tomography. 3. In cross-sectional view, when the vertical relationship of the maxillary sinus floor and maxillary roots was assessed, in 1st molars, type II (the sinus floor that extends down to the buccolingual furcation area) was predominant, while in 2nd molars, type I (the sinus floor located above the level connecting the buccal and lingual apices) was predominant. In the horizontal relationship, in 1st molars, type II (the lowest floor of the maxillary sinus located in between the buccal and lingual roots) was predominant; in 2nd molars, type I (the lowest floor of the maxillary sinus located on the buccal side of the buccal roots) and type II appeared in similar frequency. In conclusion, the SCANORA/sup (R)/ cross-sectional tomography was more effective than the frequently used panoramic view, in that the relationship of the maxillary molars and maxillary sinus floor can be evaluated more accurately and the buccolingual cross-sectional view can also be observed. And maxillary sinus floor that was close to maxillary 2nd molar had tendency to be located on buccal side than that close to 1st molar. Therefore, cross-sectional tomography is an effective and accurate method to evaluate the position of the teeth in relation to the sinus floor preoperative and can be easily used to diagnose localized periapical lesions. Also, the image quality obtained was quite satisfactory.